Double-blind randomised trial of saline solution for gargling and nasal rinsing in SARS-CoV-2 infection.

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Global Health Pub Date : 2024-12-30 DOI:10.7189/jogh.14.05044
Sebastian R Espinoza, Lexton Trauffler, Amir Shamshirsaz, Alireza Shamshirsaz, Andres Espinoza, Jimmy Espinoza, Alice O'Brien
{"title":"Double-blind randomised trial of saline solution for gargling and nasal rinsing in SARS-CoV-2 infection.","authors":"Sebastian R Espinoza, Lexton Trauffler, Amir Shamshirsaz, Alireza Shamshirsaz, Andres Espinoza, Jimmy Espinoza, Alice O'Brien","doi":"10.7189/jogh.14.05044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous studies have shown that hypertonic saline nasal irrigation and gargling reduced the duration of symptoms in upper respiratory infections caused by coronavirus. This study aims to investigate the effects of two saline regimens on symptoms associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between 2020 and 2022, individuals aged 18-65 years who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection via polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were randomly assigned to either low- or high-saline regimens for 14 days. The low-saline solutions contained 2.13 g of salt dissolved in eight ounces of warm water, while the high-saline solution contained six grams of salt dissolved in eight ounces of warm water. Participants gargled and rinsed their nasal passages four times a day for 14 days. Primary outcomes assessed included frequency and duration of SARS-CoV-2 symptoms, while secondary outcomes included hospital or intensive care unit (ICU) admission, need for mechanical ventilatory support, or mortality rates. Exclusion criteria included chronic hypertension or participation in other interventional studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-eight individuals were allocated to the low (n = 27) or high (n = 28) saline regimens; with three lost to follow-up. There were no significant differences in primary or secondary outcomes between these groups. Comparatively, during the study period, 9398 individuals with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection by positive PCR test were observed as a reference group. Hospitalisation rates in the low-saline (18.5%) and high-saline (21.4%) regimens were significantly lower than in the reference group (58.8%; P < 0.001), while no significant differences were observed in other outcomes among these groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Low and high saline regimens for gargling and nasal rinsing show similar effectiveness in reducing the frequency and duration of symptoms related to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Both saline regimens are associated with lower hospitalisation rates compared to individuals not using gargling or nasal rinsing in those infected by SARS-CoV-2.</p>","PeriodicalId":48734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Health","volume":"14 ","pages":"05044"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11683512/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.14.05044","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Previous studies have shown that hypertonic saline nasal irrigation and gargling reduced the duration of symptoms in upper respiratory infections caused by coronavirus. This study aims to investigate the effects of two saline regimens on symptoms associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2).

Methods: Between 2020 and 2022, individuals aged 18-65 years who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection via polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were randomly assigned to either low- or high-saline regimens for 14 days. The low-saline solutions contained 2.13 g of salt dissolved in eight ounces of warm water, while the high-saline solution contained six grams of salt dissolved in eight ounces of warm water. Participants gargled and rinsed their nasal passages four times a day for 14 days. Primary outcomes assessed included frequency and duration of SARS-CoV-2 symptoms, while secondary outcomes included hospital or intensive care unit (ICU) admission, need for mechanical ventilatory support, or mortality rates. Exclusion criteria included chronic hypertension or participation in other interventional studies.

Results: Fifty-eight individuals were allocated to the low (n = 27) or high (n = 28) saline regimens; with three lost to follow-up. There were no significant differences in primary or secondary outcomes between these groups. Comparatively, during the study period, 9398 individuals with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection by positive PCR test were observed as a reference group. Hospitalisation rates in the low-saline (18.5%) and high-saline (21.4%) regimens were significantly lower than in the reference group (58.8%; P < 0.001), while no significant differences were observed in other outcomes among these groups.

Conclusions: Low and high saline regimens for gargling and nasal rinsing show similar effectiveness in reducing the frequency and duration of symptoms related to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Both saline regimens are associated with lower hospitalisation rates compared to individuals not using gargling or nasal rinsing in those infected by SARS-CoV-2.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Global Health
Journal of Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.80%
发文量
240
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Global Health is a peer-reviewed journal published by the Edinburgh University Global Health Society, a not-for-profit organization registered in the UK. We publish editorials, news, viewpoints, original research and review articles in two issues per year.
期刊最新文献
Paediatric healthcare in Manhiça district through a gender lens: a retrospective analysis of 17 years of morbidity and demographic surveillance data. Spatial patterns and temporal trends in stillbirth, neonatal, and infant mortality: an exploration of country-level data from 2000 to 2021. The treatment responses among different inhalation therapies for GOLD group E patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The efficiency and productivity-changing trend of PHCIs since the 2009 health reform in China based on a three-stage DEA and Malmquist Productivity Index. Using calculations from the Lives Saved Tool in other global health modelling tools.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1