Measures to Prevent and Control COVID-19 in Skilled Nursing Facilities: A Scoping Review.

IF 11.3 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES JAMA Health Forum Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.5175
Benjamin E Canter, Agne Ulyte, Brian E McGarry, Michael L Barnett
{"title":"Measures to Prevent and Control COVID-19 in Skilled Nursing Facilities: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Benjamin E Canter, Agne Ulyte, Brian E McGarry, Michael L Barnett","doi":"10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.5175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) experienced high mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic, leading them to adopt preventive measures to counteract viral spread. A critical appraisal of these measures is essential to support SNFs in managing future infectious disease outbreaks.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To perform a scoping review of data and evidence on the use and effectiveness of preventive measures implemented from 2020 to 2024 to prevent COVID-19 infection in SNFs in the US.</p><p><strong>Evidence review: </strong>Two analyses were performed. First, an analysis of the federal COVID-19 SNF Database was conducted to describe time trends in COVID-19 incidence, deaths, testing, vaccination, and treatment among SNF residents and staff, as well as shortages in staff and personal protective equipment (PPE). Then, a comprehensive literature search was conducted from May 2023 to April 2024 to identify high-quality evidence on the use and effectiveness of modifiable preventive measures used among SNF residents. Both nonpharmacologic (facility characteristics, PPE, cohorting, and isolation, visitation, staffing, testing) and pharmacologic (vaccination, treatment) measures were reviewed.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Nationwide data indicated early shortages of PPE, infrequent testing, and persistent staff shortages in SNFs. Other nonpharmacologic measures, such as visitor restrictions or ventilation modifications, were widely adopted but there were no available national data to quantify their effectiveness. These nonpharmacologic measures lacked high-quality studies to verify effectiveness. In contrast, the effectiveness of vaccination and antiviral treatment was shown in multiple studies. Evidence also showed associations between COVID-19 outcomes in residents and crowding, staff size, hours per residents and networks, and surveillance testing of residents and staff. Despite high initial uptake, up-to-date vaccination status was suboptimal in residents and staff from 2022 to 2024. Only a minority of infected residents received antiviral treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This scoping review found that although many preventive measures were implemented in SNFs in the US throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, few were based on clear evidence of their effectiveness. Pharmacologic measures, such as vaccination and antiviral treatment, had more robust evidence supporting their efficacy than nonpharmacologic interventions. Using the scarce resources and staff of SNFs on measures of questionable effectiveness could distract from known effective ones such as vaccination and antiviral treatment. When possible, implementation efforts should be commensurate with the demonstrated effectiveness of available preventive measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":53180,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Health Forum","volume":"6 1","pages":"e245175"},"PeriodicalIF":11.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11786235/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Health Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.5175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) experienced high mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic, leading them to adopt preventive measures to counteract viral spread. A critical appraisal of these measures is essential to support SNFs in managing future infectious disease outbreaks.

Objective: To perform a scoping review of data and evidence on the use and effectiveness of preventive measures implemented from 2020 to 2024 to prevent COVID-19 infection in SNFs in the US.

Evidence review: Two analyses were performed. First, an analysis of the federal COVID-19 SNF Database was conducted to describe time trends in COVID-19 incidence, deaths, testing, vaccination, and treatment among SNF residents and staff, as well as shortages in staff and personal protective equipment (PPE). Then, a comprehensive literature search was conducted from May 2023 to April 2024 to identify high-quality evidence on the use and effectiveness of modifiable preventive measures used among SNF residents. Both nonpharmacologic (facility characteristics, PPE, cohorting, and isolation, visitation, staffing, testing) and pharmacologic (vaccination, treatment) measures were reviewed.

Findings: Nationwide data indicated early shortages of PPE, infrequent testing, and persistent staff shortages in SNFs. Other nonpharmacologic measures, such as visitor restrictions or ventilation modifications, were widely adopted but there were no available national data to quantify their effectiveness. These nonpharmacologic measures lacked high-quality studies to verify effectiveness. In contrast, the effectiveness of vaccination and antiviral treatment was shown in multiple studies. Evidence also showed associations between COVID-19 outcomes in residents and crowding, staff size, hours per residents and networks, and surveillance testing of residents and staff. Despite high initial uptake, up-to-date vaccination status was suboptimal in residents and staff from 2022 to 2024. Only a minority of infected residents received antiviral treatment.

Conclusions and relevance: This scoping review found that although many preventive measures were implemented in SNFs in the US throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, few were based on clear evidence of their effectiveness. Pharmacologic measures, such as vaccination and antiviral treatment, had more robust evidence supporting their efficacy than nonpharmacologic interventions. Using the scarce resources and staff of SNFs on measures of questionable effectiveness could distract from known effective ones such as vaccination and antiviral treatment. When possible, implementation efforts should be commensurate with the demonstrated effectiveness of available preventive measures.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在熟练护理机构预防和控制COVID-19的措施:范围审查。
重要性:在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,熟练护理机构(snf)的死亡率很高,导致它们采取预防措施来遏制病毒传播。对这些措施进行批判性评价对于支持国家卫生基金会管理未来传染病暴发至关重要。目的:对美国2020年至2024年实施的预防措施的使用和有效性的数据和证据进行范围审查,以预防snf中COVID-19感染。证据回顾:进行了两项分析。首先,对联邦COVID-19 SNF数据库进行了分析,以描述SNF居民和工作人员中COVID-19发病率、死亡、检测、接种疫苗和治疗的时间趋势,以及工作人员和个人防护装备(PPE)的短缺。然后,在2023年5月至2024年4月期间进行了全面的文献检索,以确定SNF居民中可修改预防措施的使用和有效性的高质量证据。综述了非药理学(设施特征、个人防护装备、分组和隔离、探视、人员配备、检测)和药理学(疫苗接种、治疗)措施。调查结果:全国范围内的数据表明,snf早期存在个人防护装备短缺、检测不频繁以及人员持续短缺。其他非药物措施,如访客限制或通风改造,被广泛采用,但没有可用的国家数据来量化其有效性。这些非药物措施缺乏高质量的研究来验证有效性。相反,疫苗接种和抗病毒治疗的有效性已在多项研究中得到证实。证据还显示,居民的COVID-19结果与拥挤程度、工作人员规模、每个居民和网络的工作时间以及对居民和工作人员的监测测试之间存在关联。尽管最初的接种率很高,但从2022年到2024年,居民和工作人员的最新疫苗接种状况并不理想。只有少数受感染的居民接受了抗病毒治疗。结论和相关性:本范围审查发现,尽管在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,美国的snf实施了许多预防措施,但很少有基于其有效性的明确证据。药物措施,如疫苗接种和抗病毒治疗,比非药物干预有更有力的证据支持其有效性。将国家卫生基金会的稀缺资源和工作人员用于有效性存疑的措施,可能会分散人们对疫苗接种和抗病毒治疗等已知有效措施的注意力。在可能的情况下,执行工作应与现有预防措施所显示的效力相称。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.80%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: JAMA Health Forum is an international, peer-reviewed, online, open access journal that addresses health policy and strategies affecting medicine, health, and health care. The journal publishes original research, evidence-based reports, and opinion about national and global health policy. It covers innovative approaches to health care delivery and health care economics, access, quality, safety, equity, and reform. In addition to publishing articles, JAMA Health Forum also features commentary from health policy leaders on the JAMA Forum. It covers news briefs on major reports released by government agencies, foundations, health policy think tanks, and other policy-focused organizations. JAMA Health Forum is a member of the JAMA Network, which is a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications. The journal presents curated health policy content from across the JAMA Network, including journals such as JAMA and JAMA Internal Medicine.
期刊最新文献
Trump-Era Health Coverage Changes-What Will We Know and When? Racial Disparities in Food Insecurity for High- and Low-Income Households. State Prior Authorization Prohibitions and Buprenorphine Retention Among Privately Insured Patients. A Novel Approach to Overseeing the Clinical Application of Generative AI. JAMA Health Forum.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1