{"title":"Legalization of surrogacy? Opinions from more than 7700 residents in Taiwan.","authors":"Wei Cheng, Shu-Hsiang Liu, Chih-Yu Chen, Kuo-Yu Chao","doi":"10.1057/s41271-025-00551-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study explores Taiwanese' perspectives on the potential legalization of surrogacy, an issue with diverse legal stances globally. Conducted between 17 December 2023 and 1 January 2024, this mixed-methods cross-sectional study employed Knowledge and Attitudes of Legalizing Surrogacy (KALS) questionnaire. This instrument assessed opinions and ethical considerations on various aspects including ethics and children's rights, surrogate health, offspring welfare, and social justice. Responses were quantitatively measured on a 5-point scale (with higher scores indicating more accurate knowledge or stronger perceived impact of surrogacy on society) supplemented by qualitative content analysis of open-ended responses. Out of 7780 predominantly female participants (82.8%), all scores were higher for those did not support the legalization of surrogacy (82.1% of respondents). Noteworthy concerns were raised about potential repercussions of legalizing surrogacy, underscoring the need for broader public education before any legal reforms are implemented. There is significant apprehension about surrogacy legalization in Taiwan, especially regarding its impact on women's health and children's welfare.</p>","PeriodicalId":50070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health Policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41271-025-00551-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study explores Taiwanese' perspectives on the potential legalization of surrogacy, an issue with diverse legal stances globally. Conducted between 17 December 2023 and 1 January 2024, this mixed-methods cross-sectional study employed Knowledge and Attitudes of Legalizing Surrogacy (KALS) questionnaire. This instrument assessed opinions and ethical considerations on various aspects including ethics and children's rights, surrogate health, offspring welfare, and social justice. Responses were quantitatively measured on a 5-point scale (with higher scores indicating more accurate knowledge or stronger perceived impact of surrogacy on society) supplemented by qualitative content analysis of open-ended responses. Out of 7780 predominantly female participants (82.8%), all scores were higher for those did not support the legalization of surrogacy (82.1% of respondents). Noteworthy concerns were raised about potential repercussions of legalizing surrogacy, underscoring the need for broader public education before any legal reforms are implemented. There is significant apprehension about surrogacy legalization in Taiwan, especially regarding its impact on women's health and children's welfare.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Public Health Policy (JPHP) will continue its 35 year tradition: an accessible source of scholarly articles on the epidemiologic and social foundations of public health policy, rigorously edited, and progressive.
JPHP aims to create a more inclusive public health policy dialogue, within nations and among them. It broadens public health policy debates beyond the ''health system'' to examine all forces and environments that impinge on the health of populations. It provides an exciting platform for airing controversy and framing policy debates - honing policies to solve new problems and unresolved old ones.
JPHP welcomes unsolicited original scientific and policy contributions on all public health topics. New authors are particularly encouraged to enter debates about how to improve the health of populations and reduce health disparities.