Comparison of postoperative oxygenation in children receiving sugammadex versus neostigmine for reversal of neuromuscular blockade: a retrospective cohort study.
Stephania Paredes, Sascha Ott, Julian Rössler, Busra T Cekmecelioglu, Carlos Trombetta, Yufei Li, Alparslan Turan, Kurt Ruetzler, Surendrasingh Chhabada
{"title":"Comparison of postoperative oxygenation in children receiving sugammadex versus neostigmine for reversal of neuromuscular blockade: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Stephania Paredes, Sascha Ott, Julian Rössler, Busra T Cekmecelioglu, Carlos Trombetta, Yufei Li, Alparslan Turan, Kurt Ruetzler, Surendrasingh Chhabada","doi":"10.1007/s12630-024-02904-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Residual neuromuscular blockade can impair postoperative respiratory mechanics, promoting hypoxemia and pulmonary complications. Sugammadex, with its unique mechanism of action, may offer a more effective reversal of neuromuscular blockade and respiratory function than neostigmine. We sought to test the primary hypothesis that children undergoing noncardiac surgery exhibit better initial recovery oxygenation when administered sugammadex than those administered neostigmine. Furthermore, we aimed to investigate if children administered sugammadex experience fewer in-hospital pulmonary complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a retrospective cohort study, we analyzed data from children aged 2-17 yr who underwent noncardiac surgery with general anesthesia and received neostigmine or sugammadex between January 2017 and April 2023 at the Cleveland Clinic Main Campus. Our primary outcome was postoperative oxygenation defined by the mean SpO<sub>2</sub>/F<sub>I</sub>O<sub>2</sub> ratio during the initial hour in the postanesthesia care unit. The secondary outcome was a composite of postoperative pulmonary complications during the hospital stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 3,523 cases, 430 (12.5%) involved sugammadex and 3,081 (87.5%) involved neostigmine. The median [interquartile range] of the mean SpO<sub>2</sub>/F<sub>I</sub>O<sub>2</sub> ratio during the first postoperative hour was 403 [356-464] in the sugammadex group and 408 [357-462] in the neostigmine group, resulting in an estimated difference in means of -6.2 (95% confidence interval, -12.8 to 0.41; P = 0.07) after inverse probability of treatment weighting. Overall, 22/1,916 (1.1%) inpatients experienced postoperative pulmonary complications; 2.0% of patients given sugammadex and 1.0% of patients administered neostigmine developed postoperative pulmonary complications (P = 0.19).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, postoperative oxygenation was similar in children after reversal of neuromuscular blockade with sugammadex versus neostigmine.</p>","PeriodicalId":56145,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-024-02904-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Residual neuromuscular blockade can impair postoperative respiratory mechanics, promoting hypoxemia and pulmonary complications. Sugammadex, with its unique mechanism of action, may offer a more effective reversal of neuromuscular blockade and respiratory function than neostigmine. We sought to test the primary hypothesis that children undergoing noncardiac surgery exhibit better initial recovery oxygenation when administered sugammadex than those administered neostigmine. Furthermore, we aimed to investigate if children administered sugammadex experience fewer in-hospital pulmonary complications.
Methods: In a retrospective cohort study, we analyzed data from children aged 2-17 yr who underwent noncardiac surgery with general anesthesia and received neostigmine or sugammadex between January 2017 and April 2023 at the Cleveland Clinic Main Campus. Our primary outcome was postoperative oxygenation defined by the mean SpO2/FIO2 ratio during the initial hour in the postanesthesia care unit. The secondary outcome was a composite of postoperative pulmonary complications during the hospital stay.
Results: Among 3,523 cases, 430 (12.5%) involved sugammadex and 3,081 (87.5%) involved neostigmine. The median [interquartile range] of the mean SpO2/FIO2 ratio during the first postoperative hour was 403 [356-464] in the sugammadex group and 408 [357-462] in the neostigmine group, resulting in an estimated difference in means of -6.2 (95% confidence interval, -12.8 to 0.41; P = 0.07) after inverse probability of treatment weighting. Overall, 22/1,916 (1.1%) inpatients experienced postoperative pulmonary complications; 2.0% of patients given sugammadex and 1.0% of patients administered neostigmine developed postoperative pulmonary complications (P = 0.19).
Conclusion: In this retrospective cohort study, postoperative oxygenation was similar in children after reversal of neuromuscular blockade with sugammadex versus neostigmine.
期刊介绍:
The Canadian Journal of Anesthesia (the Journal) is owned by the Canadian Anesthesiologists’
Society and is published by Springer Science + Business Media, LLM (New York). From the
first year of publication in 1954, the international exposure of the Journal has broadened
considerably, with articles now received from over 50 countries. The Journal is published
monthly, and has an impact Factor (mean journal citation frequency) of 2.127 (in 2012). Article
types consist of invited editorials, reports of original investigations (clinical and basic sciences
articles), case reports/case series, review articles, systematic reviews, accredited continuing
professional development (CPD) modules, and Letters to the Editor. The editorial content,
according to the mission statement, spans the fields of anesthesia, acute and chronic pain,
perioperative medicine and critical care. In addition, the Journal publishes practice guidelines
and standards articles relevant to clinicians. Articles are published either in English or in French,
according to the language of submission.