Pub Date : 2026-03-19DOI: 10.1007/s12630-026-03079-6
Reda Hessi, Noha Elsherbini, Mary Hague-Yearl, Steven B Backman
Curare's implementation into anesthesia care by Dr. Harold Griffith was facilitated by the availability of medical-grade curare, the demonstration that it could provide safe muscle relaxation in psychiatric patients undergoing "shock therapy," and the foresight of a Squibb scientist who realized its potential in the operating room. Griffith's demonstration that curare safely provided muscle relaxation in surgical patients eliminated the need for dangerously high doses of anesthetic gases. This helped pave the way to "balanced anesthesia," whereby small doses of selectively acting drugs are given to achieve specific ends.Curare's initial reception by anesthesiologists, particularly in the UK, was frosty owing to its lingering reputation as a lethal poison associated with witchcraft. We recently unearthed a scathing review of Griffith's work housed in the Wellcome Collection (London, UK). That review, requested by Sir Robert Macintosh, Oxford University's inaugural Nuffield Professor of Anesthesia, was authored by his colleague, Dr. Stuart L. Cowan. In hindsight, this disparaging assessment is especially fascinating: Why was this review so negative when curare would have such a remarkable positive impact on medicine? In the present Special Article, we present the above British response to curare's introduction to anesthesia and trace curare's remarkable journey through the contributions of explorers, scientists, and clinicians preceding the review to help put it in perspective.
哈罗德·格里菲斯(Harold Griffith)博士将Curare应用于麻醉护理,这得益于医疗级Curare的可用性,证明它可以为接受“休克疗法”的精神病患者提供安全的肌肉放松,以及一位施奎布(Squibb)科学家的远见卓识,他意识到它在手术室中的潜力。格里菲斯的论证表明,curare可以安全地为外科病人提供肌肉放松,从而消除了对危险的高剂量麻醉气体的需要。这为“平衡麻醉”铺平了道路,通过小剂量的选择性作用药物来达到特定的目的。麻醉师,尤其是英国麻醉师最初对Curare的反应冷淡,因为它一直被认为是一种与巫术有关的致命毒药。我们最近在英国伦敦的惠康收藏馆(Wellcome Collection)发现了一篇对格里菲斯作品的尖锐评论。牛津大学首任纳菲尔德麻醉学教授罗伯特·麦金托什爵士(Sir Robert Macintosh)要求进行这项审查,由他的同事斯图尔特·l·考恩(Stuart L. Cowan)博士撰写。事后看来,这种贬低性的评价特别吸引人:为什么当curare对医学产生如此显著的积极影响时,这篇评论却如此消极?在这篇特别文章中,我们将介绍上述英国人对curare引入麻醉的回应,并通过回顾之前探索者、科学家和临床医生的贡献来追溯curare的非凡历程,以帮助人们正确看待它。
{"title":"Dr. Harold Griffith and Sir Robert Macintosh: a British response to curare's introduction to anesthesia.","authors":"Reda Hessi, Noha Elsherbini, Mary Hague-Yearl, Steven B Backman","doi":"10.1007/s12630-026-03079-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-026-03079-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Curare's implementation into anesthesia care by Dr. Harold Griffith was facilitated by the availability of medical-grade curare, the demonstration that it could provide safe muscle relaxation in psychiatric patients undergoing \"shock therapy,\" and the foresight of a Squibb scientist who realized its potential in the operating room. Griffith's demonstration that curare safely provided muscle relaxation in surgical patients eliminated the need for dangerously high doses of anesthetic gases. This helped pave the way to \"balanced anesthesia,\" whereby small doses of selectively acting drugs are given to achieve specific ends.Curare's initial reception by anesthesiologists, particularly in the UK, was frosty owing to its lingering reputation as a lethal poison associated with witchcraft. We recently unearthed a scathing review of Griffith's work housed in the Wellcome Collection (London, UK). That review, requested by Sir Robert Macintosh, Oxford University's inaugural Nuffield Professor of Anesthesia, was authored by his colleague, Dr. Stuart L. Cowan. In hindsight, this disparaging assessment is especially fascinating: Why was this review so negative when curare would have such a remarkable positive impact on medicine? In the present Special Article, we present the above British response to curare's introduction to anesthesia and trace curare's remarkable journey through the contributions of explorers, scientists, and clinicians preceding the review to help put it in perspective.</p>","PeriodicalId":56145,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147488692","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-17DOI: 10.1007/s12630-026-03082-x
Olivier Choquet, Fabien Swisser, Romain Delannoy, Philippe Biboulet, Corentin Simon, Sophie Bringuier, Xavier Capdevila
{"title":"Ultrasound examination of gastric contents in patients undergoingambulatory surgery.","authors":"Olivier Choquet, Fabien Swisser, Romain Delannoy, Philippe Biboulet, Corentin Simon, Sophie Bringuier, Xavier Capdevila","doi":"10.1007/s12630-026-03082-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-026-03082-x","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":56145,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147476190","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-17DOI: 10.1007/s12630-026-03083-w
Nancy Wang, Nicholas C West, McKenna Postles, Lynnie R Correll
{"title":"The prevalence and characteristics of imposter syndrome among anesthesiology staff and trainees in British Columbia, Canada: an online survey study.","authors":"Nancy Wang, Nicholas C West, McKenna Postles, Lynnie R Correll","doi":"10.1007/s12630-026-03083-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-026-03083-w","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":56145,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147476214","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-17DOI: 10.1007/s12630-026-03076-9
Jonathan G Bailey, Garrett Barry, Thomas Volk
{"title":"Correction: Local anesthetic dosing for fascial plane blocks to avoid systemic toxicity: a narrative review.","authors":"Jonathan G Bailey, Garrett Barry, Thomas Volk","doi":"10.1007/s12630-026-03076-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-026-03076-9","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":56145,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147476187","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-12DOI: 10.1007/s12630-026-03080-z
Gregory R Dobson, Anthony Chau
{"title":"Special announcement: Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia-Revised Edition 2026.","authors":"Gregory R Dobson, Anthony Chau","doi":"10.1007/s12630-026-03080-z","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-026-03080-z","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":56145,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147445657","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-12DOI: 10.1007/s12630-026-03075-w
Gregory R Dobson, Alex Beomju Bak, Anthony Chau, Justine Denomme, Giuseppe Fuda, Conor Mc Donnell, Robert Milkovich, Andrew D Milne, John Murdoch, Kathryn Sparrow, Yamini Subramani, Christopher Young
Overview: The Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia-Revised Edition 2026 (the Guidelines) were prepared by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society (CAS), which reserves the right to determine the publication and distribution of the Guidelines. The Guidelines are subject to revision and updated versions are published annually. The Guidelines supersede all previously published versions of this document. Although the CAS encourages Canadian anesthesiologists to adhere to its practice guidelines to ensure high-quality patient care, the CAS cannot guarantee any specific patient outcome. Anesthesiologists should exercise their own professional judgement in determining the proper course of action for any patient's circumstances. The CAS assumes no responsibility or liability for any error or omission arising from the use of any information contained in its Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia.
{"title":"Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia-Revised Edition 2026.","authors":"Gregory R Dobson, Alex Beomju Bak, Anthony Chau, Justine Denomme, Giuseppe Fuda, Conor Mc Donnell, Robert Milkovich, Andrew D Milne, John Murdoch, Kathryn Sparrow, Yamini Subramani, Christopher Young","doi":"10.1007/s12630-026-03075-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-026-03075-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Overview: </strong>The Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia-Revised Edition 2026 (the Guidelines) were prepared by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society (CAS), which reserves the right to determine the publication and distribution of the Guidelines. The Guidelines are subject to revision and updated versions are published annually. The Guidelines supersede all previously published versions of this document. Although the CAS encourages Canadian anesthesiologists to adhere to its practice guidelines to ensure high-quality patient care, the CAS cannot guarantee any specific patient outcome. Anesthesiologists should exercise their own professional judgement in determining the proper course of action for any patient's circumstances. The CAS assumes no responsibility or liability for any error or omission arising from the use of any information contained in its Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":56145,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147445749","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-09DOI: 10.1007/s12630-026-03078-7
Valerie Zaphiratos, Ronald B George
{"title":"Neuraxial anesthesia in patients with placenta accreta spectrum disorder: balancing clinical strategy with shared decision-making.","authors":"Valerie Zaphiratos, Ronald B George","doi":"10.1007/s12630-026-03078-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-026-03078-7","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":56145,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147391477","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-04DOI: 10.1007/s12630-026-03069-8
Hiroko Aoyama, Kanji Uchida, Kazuyoshi Aoyama, Alan Yang, Petros Pechlivanoglou, Marina Englesakis, Yoshitsugu Yamada, Eddy Fan
Purpose: Long-term effects of ventilatory strategies/adjunctive therapies received in the intensive care unit on mortality of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is uncertain. To explore 180-day mortality in adult patients with ARDS, we conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) comparing the effects of various prespecified interventions added to lung-protective ventilation (LPV).
Source: We systematically searched six databases on 8 November 2024. Two reviewers independently identified eligible randomized clinical trials with published Kaplan-Meier curves, exploring prespecified interventions combined with LPV and LPV alone. Data were synthesized with NMA of survival curves using Bayesian random effects fractional polynomial models.
Principal findings: Twenty-two trials with 8,653 participants assessed six different interventions added to LPV (open lung strategy, neuromuscular blockade [NMBA], corticosteroids, high-frequency oscillatory ventilation [HFOV], prone positioning, and venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation [VV ECMO]), compared with LPV alone. We did not include inhaled pulmonary vasodilator trials. The primary NMA computed survival probability of each intervention on the basis of survival probability of LPV alone at 180 days (0.52; 95% credible interval, 0.49 to 0.55). Compared with LPV alone, 1) the evidence suggests prone positioning results in a reduction in 180-day mortality; 2) an open lung strategy does not reduce 180-day mortality; 3) VV ECMO, NMBA, and corticosteroids may reduce 180-day mortality (very uncertain); and 4) HFOV may increase 180-day mortality (very uncertain). We extrapolated reported mortalities to 180-day mortality in 16 trials, where there might be discrepancy between raw and extrapolated numbers in event rate.
Conclusions: Prone positioning may improve long-term mortality in patients with ARDS.
Study registration: PROSPERO ( CRD42019131849 ); first submitted 26 April 2019.
{"title":"Effect of therapeutic interventions combined with lung-protective ventilation on long-term mortality of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a network meta-analysis.","authors":"Hiroko Aoyama, Kanji Uchida, Kazuyoshi Aoyama, Alan Yang, Petros Pechlivanoglou, Marina Englesakis, Yoshitsugu Yamada, Eddy Fan","doi":"10.1007/s12630-026-03069-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-026-03069-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Long-term effects of ventilatory strategies/adjunctive therapies received in the intensive care unit on mortality of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is uncertain. To explore 180-day mortality in adult patients with ARDS, we conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) comparing the effects of various prespecified interventions added to lung-protective ventilation (LPV).</p><p><strong>Source: </strong>We systematically searched six databases on 8 November 2024. Two reviewers independently identified eligible randomized clinical trials with published Kaplan-Meier curves, exploring prespecified interventions combined with LPV and LPV alone. Data were synthesized with NMA of survival curves using Bayesian random effects fractional polynomial models.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>Twenty-two trials with 8,653 participants assessed six different interventions added to LPV (open lung strategy, neuromuscular blockade [NMBA], corticosteroids, high-frequency oscillatory ventilation [HFOV], prone positioning, and venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation [VV ECMO]), compared with LPV alone. We did not include inhaled pulmonary vasodilator trials. The primary NMA computed survival probability of each intervention on the basis of survival probability of LPV alone at 180 days (0.52; 95% credible interval, 0.49 to 0.55). Compared with LPV alone, 1) the evidence suggests prone positioning results in a reduction in 180-day mortality; 2) an open lung strategy does not reduce 180-day mortality; 3) VV ECMO, NMBA, and corticosteroids may reduce 180-day mortality (very uncertain); and 4) HFOV may increase 180-day mortality (very uncertain). We extrapolated reported mortalities to 180-day mortality in 16 trials, where there might be discrepancy between raw and extrapolated numbers in event rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Prone positioning may improve long-term mortality in patients with ARDS.</p><p><strong>Study registration: </strong>PROSPERO ( CRD42019131849 ); first submitted 26 April 2019.</p>","PeriodicalId":56145,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147357760","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-25DOI: 10.1007/s12630-026-03074-x
Michael A Smith
{"title":"More than meets the \"I\": the complex decision to withhold or continue renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors before surgery.","authors":"Michael A Smith","doi":"10.1007/s12630-026-03074-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-026-03074-x","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":56145,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147285901","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-18DOI: 10.1007/s12630-026-03068-9
Alexandra Bickett, Matthew Fuller, Jennifer B Gilner, Luke A Gatta, Vijay Krishnamorthy, Tetsu Ohnuma, Karthik Raghunathan, Ashraf S Habib
Purpose: We sought to evaluate the incidence of severe maternal morbidity (SMM) and intensive care unit (ICU) admissions following Cesarean hysterectomy for placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) and to assess factors associated with those outcomes.
Methods: We conducted a historical cohort study to identify patients with PAS who had Cesarean hysterectomy in the USA using delivery hospitalizations in the Premier Inc. database (Charlotte, NC, USA) from 1 October 2015 to 30 June 2021. We collected information about the 21 SMM events as defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Since hysterectomy is one of those SMM events, and all patients in our cohort underwent hysterectomy, we assessed SMM events, excluding hysterectomy, using International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision (ICD-10) diagnosis codes. We performed mixed-effects logistic regression models with random intercepts for hospitals to assess for factors associated with SMM.
Results: Among 1,972 patients, SMM (excluding hysterectomy) and ICU admission occurred in 54% and 44% of the patients, respectively. The following factors were associated with SMM: placenta percreta compared with accreta (odds ratio [OR], 1.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09 to 1.95), blood loss anemia (OR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.26 to 2.33), deficiency anemia (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.96), neuraxial compared with general anesthesia (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.91), admission year (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.80), and hospitals in the Midwest (OR, 0.56, 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.96) and West (OR, 0.47, 95% CI, 0.26 to 0.84) regions of the USA compared with those in the South.
Conclusions: Patients with PAS who underwent Cesarean hysterectomy had a high incidence of SMM and ICU admissions. This finding highlights the need for all centres performing Cesarean deliveries to have plans in place to manage patients with PAS.
{"title":"Severe maternal morbidity following Cesarean hysterectomy for placenta accreta spectrum: a historical cohort study.","authors":"Alexandra Bickett, Matthew Fuller, Jennifer B Gilner, Luke A Gatta, Vijay Krishnamorthy, Tetsu Ohnuma, Karthik Raghunathan, Ashraf S Habib","doi":"10.1007/s12630-026-03068-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-026-03068-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We sought to evaluate the incidence of severe maternal morbidity (SMM) and intensive care unit (ICU) admissions following Cesarean hysterectomy for placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) and to assess factors associated with those outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a historical cohort study to identify patients with PAS who had Cesarean hysterectomy in the USA using delivery hospitalizations in the Premier Inc. database (Charlotte, NC, USA) from 1 October 2015 to 30 June 2021. We collected information about the 21 SMM events as defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Since hysterectomy is one of those SMM events, and all patients in our cohort underwent hysterectomy, we assessed SMM events, excluding hysterectomy, using International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision (ICD-10) diagnosis codes. We performed mixed-effects logistic regression models with random intercepts for hospitals to assess for factors associated with SMM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1,972 patients, SMM (excluding hysterectomy) and ICU admission occurred in 54% and 44% of the patients, respectively. The following factors were associated with SMM: placenta percreta compared with accreta (odds ratio [OR], 1.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09 to 1.95), blood loss anemia (OR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.26 to 2.33), deficiency anemia (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.96), neuraxial compared with general anesthesia (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.91), admission year (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.80), and hospitals in the Midwest (OR, 0.56, 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.96) and West (OR, 0.47, 95% CI, 0.26 to 0.84) regions of the USA compared with those in the South.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with PAS who underwent Cesarean hysterectomy had a high incidence of SMM and ICU admissions. This finding highlights the need for all centres performing Cesarean deliveries to have plans in place to manage patients with PAS.</p>","PeriodicalId":56145,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146222262","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}