Replacing native grazers with livestock influences arthropods to have implications for ecosystem functions and disease

IF 4.3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Ecological Applications Pub Date : 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1002/eap.3091
Pronoy Baidya, Shamik Roy, Jalmesh Karapurkar, Sumanta Bagchi
{"title":"Replacing native grazers with livestock influences arthropods to have implications for ecosystem functions and disease","authors":"Pronoy Baidya,&nbsp;Shamik Roy,&nbsp;Jalmesh Karapurkar,&nbsp;Sumanta Bagchi","doi":"10.1002/eap.3091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Grazing by large mammalian herbivores influences ecosystem structure and functions through its impacts on vegetation and soil, as well as by the influence on other animals such as arthropods. As livestock progressively replace native grazers around the world, it is pertinent to ask whether they have comparable influence over arthropods, or not. We use a replicated landscape-level, long-term grazer-exclusion experiment (14 years) to address how ground-dwelling arthropods respond to such a change in grazing regime where livestock replace native grazers in the cold deserts of the Trans-Himalayan ecosystem of northern India. We analyze spatial and temporal variation in the abundance of 25,604 arthropods sampled using pitfall traps across 2765 trap-days through the duration of the growing season spanning spring, summer, and autumn. These were from 88 operational taxonomic units covering six orders from 33 families (ants, wasps, bees, ticks and mites, spiders, grasshoppers, and beetles). We find that grazer assemblage—whether livestock or native herbivores—had a strong influence on both vegetation and arthropods. Partial redundancy analysis (RDA) showed that 53.6% of the spatial and temporal variation in arthropod communities could be explained by grazing and by grazer assemblage identity, alongside covariation with vegetation composition and soil variables. Structural equation models revealed that grazing and grazer assemblage identity have direct effects on arthropods, as well as indirect effects that are mediated through vegetation. Importantly, spiders (predators) were less abundant under livestock, whereas grasshoppers (leaf eaters) and ticks and mites (parasitic disease vectors) were more abundant, compared with native grazers. Reduction in spiders can fundamentally alter material and energy flow through the cascading effects of losing predators, and an abundance of grasshoppers may even contribute to vegetation degradation that is often associated with livestock. Parallelly, increases in ticks and mites lead to concerns over vector-borne disease that require planned interventions to align animal husbandry with One Health. Thus, losing native grazers to livestock expansion can have wide-ranging repercussions via arthropods. This may not only affect ecosystem structure and functions, but also offer challenges and opportunities to mitigate risks from vector-borne disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":55168,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Applications","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Applications","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eap.3091","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Grazing by large mammalian herbivores influences ecosystem structure and functions through its impacts on vegetation and soil, as well as by the influence on other animals such as arthropods. As livestock progressively replace native grazers around the world, it is pertinent to ask whether they have comparable influence over arthropods, or not. We use a replicated landscape-level, long-term grazer-exclusion experiment (14 years) to address how ground-dwelling arthropods respond to such a change in grazing regime where livestock replace native grazers in the cold deserts of the Trans-Himalayan ecosystem of northern India. We analyze spatial and temporal variation in the abundance of 25,604 arthropods sampled using pitfall traps across 2765 trap-days through the duration of the growing season spanning spring, summer, and autumn. These were from 88 operational taxonomic units covering six orders from 33 families (ants, wasps, bees, ticks and mites, spiders, grasshoppers, and beetles). We find that grazer assemblage—whether livestock or native herbivores—had a strong influence on both vegetation and arthropods. Partial redundancy analysis (RDA) showed that 53.6% of the spatial and temporal variation in arthropod communities could be explained by grazing and by grazer assemblage identity, alongside covariation with vegetation composition and soil variables. Structural equation models revealed that grazing and grazer assemblage identity have direct effects on arthropods, as well as indirect effects that are mediated through vegetation. Importantly, spiders (predators) were less abundant under livestock, whereas grasshoppers (leaf eaters) and ticks and mites (parasitic disease vectors) were more abundant, compared with native grazers. Reduction in spiders can fundamentally alter material and energy flow through the cascading effects of losing predators, and an abundance of grasshoppers may even contribute to vegetation degradation that is often associated with livestock. Parallelly, increases in ticks and mites lead to concerns over vector-borne disease that require planned interventions to align animal husbandry with One Health. Thus, losing native grazers to livestock expansion can have wide-ranging repercussions via arthropods. This may not only affect ecosystem structure and functions, but also offer challenges and opportunities to mitigate risks from vector-borne disease.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用家畜代替本地食草动物对节肢动物产生影响,对生态系统功能和疾病产生影响。
大型食草哺乳动物的放牧通过对植被和土壤的影响以及对节肢动物等其他动物的影响来影响生态系统的结构和功能。随着世界各地的牲畜逐渐取代本土食草动物,我们有必要问一问,它们对节肢动物是否有类似的影响。在印度北部跨喜马拉雅生态系统的寒冷沙漠中,牲畜取代了本地食草动物,我们使用了一项复制的景观级长期食草动物排除实验(14年)来研究地面生活节肢动物如何应对放牧制度的这种变化。在春夏秋冬三季的2765个捕集日中,利用陷阱法对25604种节肢动物样本进行了丰度时空变化分析。这些标本来自33科(蚂蚁、黄蜂、蜜蜂、蜱螨、蜘蛛、蚱蜢和甲虫)6目88个分类学单位。我们发现食草动物组合——无论是家畜还是本地食草动物——对植被和节肢动物都有很强的影响。部分冗余分析(RDA)表明,53.6%的节肢动物群落时空变异可以用放牧和食草动物组合特性解释,并与植被组成和土壤变量共变。结构方程模型表明,放牧和食草动物组合身份对节肢动物有直接影响,也有通过植被介导的间接影响。重要的是,与本地食草动物相比,蜘蛛(捕食者)的数量较少,而蚱蜢(食叶动物)和蜱虫和螨虫(寄生虫病载体)的数量更多。蜘蛛数量的减少可以通过失去捕食者的级联效应从根本上改变物质和能量的流动,大量的蚱蜢甚至可能导致植被退化,这通常与牲畜有关。与此同时,蜱虫和螨虫的增加引起了人们对媒介传播疾病的担忧,需要有计划的干预措施,使畜牧业与“同一个健康”保持一致。因此,牲畜扩张导致本土食草动物减少,可能会通过节肢动物产生广泛的影响。这不仅可能影响生态系统的结构和功能,而且还可能为减轻病媒传播疾病的风险带来挑战和机遇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Applications
Ecological Applications 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
2.00%
发文量
268
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The pages of Ecological Applications are open to research and discussion papers that integrate ecological science and concepts with their application and implications. Of special interest are papers that develop the basic scientific principles on which environmental decision-making should rest, and those that discuss the application of ecological concepts to environmental problem solving, policy, and management. Papers that deal explicitly with policy matters are welcome. Interdisciplinary approaches are encouraged, as are short communications on emerging environmental challenges.
期刊最新文献
Drivers of population dynamics and juvenile mortality in Northwest Atlantic harp seals At the intersection of soundscapes and roads: Quantifying anthrophony's influence on wildlife crossing structure use Atmospheric dryness dominates diurnal carbon–water coupling in mid-latitude forests Divergent plant and nematode community responses to long-term nitrogen enrichment in a meadow steppe Soil fungal influence on the diversity–invasibility relationship depends on interacting species identities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1