Pendulum model to compare center of pressure data between different force plates

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES Gait & posture Pub Date : 2025-01-25 DOI:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.01.026
Sam Limpach , Peter Leinen , Thomas Muehlbauer , Katharina Borgmann , Stefan Panzer
{"title":"Pendulum model to compare center of pressure data between different force plates","authors":"Sam Limpach ,&nbsp;Peter Leinen ,&nbsp;Thomas Muehlbauer ,&nbsp;Katharina Borgmann ,&nbsp;Stefan Panzer","doi":"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.01.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Force plates are used to measure postural control. However, force plates differ with regard to the type of sensors and the position of the sensors. The purpose of the study was to introduce a method for testing the comparability of two force plates with different force transducers regarding their center of pressure (CoP) capturing.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Two portable force plates (Kistler Model 9260AA vs. AMTI AccuSway-Optimized ACS-O) were compared. To produce repeatable, close to identical CoP data, a two-point suspension pendulum was used. The deflection angle of the pendulum was kept constant as well as the time of capturing the swing (30 s) and the frequency of capturing the data (1000 Hz). To test for comparability, the captured data was z-transformed and superimposed. Furthermore, interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) estimates, and their 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.</div></div><div><h3>Results and significance</h3><div>The ICC for the two tested force plates were \"excellent\" (x-axis: ICC = 0.990 (95 % CI [0.990–0.990]), y-axis: ICC = 0.987 (95 % CI [0.987–0.988])). Thus, the presented method with the two-point suspension pendulum generated repeatable and almost identical oscillations in the x- and y-axis to calculate the CoP.</div></div><div><h3>Data availability</h3><div>Data will be made available on request.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12496,"journal":{"name":"Gait & posture","volume":"118 ","pages":"Pages 13-16"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gait & posture","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966636225000268","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Force plates are used to measure postural control. However, force plates differ with regard to the type of sensors and the position of the sensors. The purpose of the study was to introduce a method for testing the comparability of two force plates with different force transducers regarding their center of pressure (CoP) capturing.

Methods

Two portable force plates (Kistler Model 9260AA vs. AMTI AccuSway-Optimized ACS-O) were compared. To produce repeatable, close to identical CoP data, a two-point suspension pendulum was used. The deflection angle of the pendulum was kept constant as well as the time of capturing the swing (30 s) and the frequency of capturing the data (1000 Hz). To test for comparability, the captured data was z-transformed and superimposed. Furthermore, interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) estimates, and their 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.

Results and significance

The ICC for the two tested force plates were "excellent" (x-axis: ICC = 0.990 (95 % CI [0.990–0.990]), y-axis: ICC = 0.987 (95 % CI [0.987–0.988])). Thus, the presented method with the two-point suspension pendulum generated repeatable and almost identical oscillations in the x- and y-axis to calculate the CoP.

Data availability

Data will be made available on request.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gait & posture
Gait & posture 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
616
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Gait & Posture is a vehicle for the publication of up-to-date basic and clinical research on all aspects of locomotion and balance. The topics covered include: Techniques for the measurement of gait and posture, and the standardization of results presentation; Studies of normal and pathological gait; Treatment of gait and postural abnormalities; Biomechanical and theoretical approaches to gait and posture; Mathematical models of joint and muscle mechanics; Neurological and musculoskeletal function in gait and posture; The evolution of upright posture and bipedal locomotion; Adaptations of carrying loads, walking on uneven surfaces, climbing stairs etc; spinal biomechanics only if they are directly related to gait and/or posture and are of general interest to our readers; The effect of aging and development on gait and posture; Psychological and cultural aspects of gait; Patient education.
期刊最新文献
Validation of an algorithm for detecting turning in people with cognitive impairment, considering dementia disease subtype Impact of mild leg length discrepancy on pelvic alignment and gait compensation in children Fully instrumented gait analysis in rare bone diseases – A scoping review of the literature Effects of external ankle braces on kinematics and kinetics of the lower limb during the cutting maneuver in healthy females The effects of Hyperkyphosis on Balance and Fall Risk in older adults: A Systematic Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1