Homood M Almutairi, Mohammed Hazazi, Abdulaziz Badar Almutairi, Abdulrahman Nasser Almutairi, Amirah Fayez Almutairi, Ali Saad Alshahrani, Salman Khalid Alotaibi, Wala S AlShiha, Iman Almashharawi
{"title":"Comparison of Cochlear Implant Efficacy in Pre- Versus Postsynaptic Auditory Neuropathy: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Homood M Almutairi, Mohammed Hazazi, Abdulaziz Badar Almutairi, Abdulrahman Nasser Almutairi, Amirah Fayez Almutairi, Ali Saad Alshahrani, Salman Khalid Alotaibi, Wala S AlShiha, Iman Almashharawi","doi":"10.1177/01455613251315649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Etiological factors affecting outcomes of cochlear implants (Cis) are known; however, a direct comparison of efficacy based on lesion location is needed. We aimed to systematically examine the current evidence to compare the effectiveness of CIs in patients with presynaptic versus postsynaptic neuropathy. <b>Methods:</b> A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases, including MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase, CENTRAL, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, and PsycINFO. Studies were selected based on their examination of CI efficacy in patients with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder, distinguishing between pre- and postsynaptic lesions using genetic markers or electrophysiological assessments. <b>Results:</b> Analysis of seven studies consistently highlighted the importance of etiological diagnosis in predicting CI outcomes. Genetic mutations were correlated with more favorable CI outcomes, emphasizing the role of genetic etiology. Electrophysiological measures also proved useful in assessing auditory function, further emphasizing the value of detailed diagnostics. <b>Conclusion:</b> Etiological factors generally influence CI outcomes; however, the success varies between pre- and postsynaptic neuropathies. Integrating genetic and electrophysiological diagnostics is crucial for predicting CI performance, suggesting a need for personalized approaches in evaluating CI candidates for more targeted and effective auditory rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":93984,"journal":{"name":"Ear, nose, & throat journal","volume":" ","pages":"1455613251315649"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ear, nose, & throat journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01455613251315649","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Etiological factors affecting outcomes of cochlear implants (Cis) are known; however, a direct comparison of efficacy based on lesion location is needed. We aimed to systematically examine the current evidence to compare the effectiveness of CIs in patients with presynaptic versus postsynaptic neuropathy. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases, including MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase, CENTRAL, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, and PsycINFO. Studies were selected based on their examination of CI efficacy in patients with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder, distinguishing between pre- and postsynaptic lesions using genetic markers or electrophysiological assessments. Results: Analysis of seven studies consistently highlighted the importance of etiological diagnosis in predicting CI outcomes. Genetic mutations were correlated with more favorable CI outcomes, emphasizing the role of genetic etiology. Electrophysiological measures also proved useful in assessing auditory function, further emphasizing the value of detailed diagnostics. Conclusion: Etiological factors generally influence CI outcomes; however, the success varies between pre- and postsynaptic neuropathies. Integrating genetic and electrophysiological diagnostics is crucial for predicting CI performance, suggesting a need for personalized approaches in evaluating CI candidates for more targeted and effective auditory rehabilitation.
背景:影响人工耳蜗植入(Cis)结果的病因因素是已知的;然而,需要根据病变部位直接比较疗效。我们的目的是系统地检查目前的证据,比较CIs在突触前和突触后神经病患者中的有效性。方法:在MEDLINE(通过PubMed)、Embase、CENTRAL、Web of Science、Scopus、CINAHL、PsycINFO等多个数据库进行综合文献检索。研究的选择是基于对听神经病变谱障碍患者CI疗效的检查,使用遗传标记或电生理评估来区分突触前和突触后病变。结果:对七项研究的分析一致强调了病因诊断在预测CI结果中的重要性。基因突变与更有利的CI结果相关,强调了遗传病因的作用。电生理测量在评估听觉功能方面也被证明是有用的,进一步强调了详细诊断的价值。结论:病因因素普遍影响CI结局;然而,成功与否在突触前和突触后神经病之间有所不同。整合遗传和电生理诊断对于预测CI的表现至关重要,这表明需要个性化的方法来评估CI候选人,以实现更有针对性和更有效的听觉康复。