Strategies for Academic Integrity Orientation in Undergraduate Nursing Programs: A Scoping Review.

IF 1.9 The Journal of nursing education Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-24 DOI:10.3928/01484834-20241204-03
Amanda Tracy
{"title":"Strategies for Academic Integrity Orientation in Undergraduate Nursing Programs: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Amanda Tracy","doi":"10.3928/01484834-20241204-03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Promoting academic integrity is an essential role of nurse educators. This scoping review examined best practices for orienting undergraduate nursing students on academic integrity policies. Methods: CINAHL Plus, ERIC, and Academic Search Premier databases were searched for studies published in English since 2013. In addition, reference lists of included studies were hand-searched for supplementary articles. Included studies focused on academic integrity policy orientation practices in higher education.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 10 included studies are presented in this review. Few studies on academic policy orientation practices specific to nursing (<i>n</i> = 1) exist. Most of the studies (<i>n</i> = 8) focused on higher education practices with no specific discipline focus.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Future research should focus on academic integrity policy orientation in nursing education. Nurse educators can implement generalizable recommendations from current literature. Recommendations include promoting a positive environment of academic integrity and faculty-led policy orientation practices. <b>[<i>J Nurs Educ</i>. 2025;64(1):40-43.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":94241,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of nursing education","volume":"64 1","pages":"40-43"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of nursing education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20241204-03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Promoting academic integrity is an essential role of nurse educators. This scoping review examined best practices for orienting undergraduate nursing students on academic integrity policies. Methods: CINAHL Plus, ERIC, and Academic Search Premier databases were searched for studies published in English since 2013. In addition, reference lists of included studies were hand-searched for supplementary articles. Included studies focused on academic integrity policy orientation practices in higher education.

Results: Data from 10 included studies are presented in this review. Few studies on academic policy orientation practices specific to nursing (n = 1) exist. Most of the studies (n = 8) focused on higher education practices with no specific discipline focus.

Conclusion: Future research should focus on academic integrity policy orientation in nursing education. Nurse educators can implement generalizable recommendations from current literature. Recommendations include promoting a positive environment of academic integrity and faculty-led policy orientation practices. [J Nurs Educ. 2025;64(1):40-43.].

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本科护理专业学术诚信导向的策略:范围综述。
背景:促进学术诚信是护理教育工作者的重要角色。本综述研究了指导本科护理学生学术诚信政策的最佳实践。方法:检索2013年以来发表的英文研究,检索CINAHL Plus、ERIC和Academic Search Premier数据库。此外,人工检索纳入研究的参考文献列表以查找补充文章。纳入了关注高等教育学术诚信政策导向实践的研究。结果:本综述纳入了10项研究的数据。针对护理学的学术政策导向实践研究较少(n = 1)。大多数研究(n = 8)集中在高等教育实践上,没有具体的学科重点。结论:今后的研究重点应放在护理教育的学术诚信政策导向上。护理教育者可以从当前文献中实施可概括的建议。建议包括促进积极的学术诚信环境和教师主导的政策导向实践。[J].中国生物医学工程学报,2015;32(1):444 - 444。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bridging Pharmacology Didactics to Clinical Settings: Pharmacists Participating in Nursing Student Practicums. Graduate Nursing Students' Perceptions of Discussion Board Quality. Generative AI Podcasts for Learning: Perceptions of Faculty and Graduate Nursing Students. Collaborative Exams and Reflections as Learning Strategies in Undergraduate Nursing Pharmacology. Speed Mentoring in Doctoral Nursing Education: A Quality-Improvement Project Tackling Student Anxiety, Confidence, and Understanding.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1