Reliability, validity and practicability of the Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment tool (CPAx) following an e-learning programme: A clinimetric study
Sabrina Eggmann , Angela Kindler , Roger Hilfiker , Peter Nydahl
{"title":"Reliability, validity and practicability of the Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment tool (CPAx) following an e-learning programme: A clinimetric study","authors":"Sabrina Eggmann , Angela Kindler , Roger Hilfiker , Peter Nydahl","doi":"10.1016/j.iccn.2025.103959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To investigate inter- and intra-rater reliability, content and concurrent validity, and practicability of the Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment tool (CPAx) – a measurement instrument for physical function and activity for patients with a critical illness – from multidisciplinary, German-speaking healthcare professionals.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a prospective, longitudinal, clinimetric study. Participants who completed a novel German CPAx e-learning were invited to participate in a voluntary, web-based, piloted, two-round survey. The two rounds were separated by 3–4 weeks to limit recollection of the two patient videos within the e-learning. Following informed consent, we collected participants’ characteristics, their CPAx ratings and scoring-duration for the two video cases, content validity indexes along with questions on the practicability of the CPAx. Data was analysed descriptively, quantitatively using Bayesian methods, and qualitatively with an inductive content approach.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 61 clinicians (53 (87 %) physiotherapists, 6 (10 %) nurses, 2 (3 %) occupational therapists) from Switzerland (37 (64 %)), Germany (13 (22 %)), and Austria (8 (14 %)) participated. Inter- (n = 61) and intra-rater (n = 35) reliability for the CPAx were excellent (intraclass correlation coefficients of > 0.8). Content validity index of the CPAx showed a high relevance (> 0.9), though novice users slightly differed from the expert rating (concurrent validity). Healthcare professionals described the CPAx as a practical tool to plan and evaluate physical rehabilitation with a total scoring duration of 5 min, whereby lack of routine, time, and application were seen as barriers in clinical practice.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study demonstrated the German CPAx as a highly reliable (between and within raters), relevant and practical tool across professions, settings, and countries. These results support an online training, whereby future work should focus on consensus and application into clinical practice.</div></div><div><h3>Implications for Clinical practice</h3><div>Following an e-learning, the CPAx can be used reliably by multidisciplinary, German-speaking healthcare professionals potentially enhancing physical rehabilitation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51322,"journal":{"name":"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing","volume":"87 ","pages":"Article 103959"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964339725000205","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
To investigate inter- and intra-rater reliability, content and concurrent validity, and practicability of the Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment tool (CPAx) – a measurement instrument for physical function and activity for patients with a critical illness – from multidisciplinary, German-speaking healthcare professionals.
Methods
This was a prospective, longitudinal, clinimetric study. Participants who completed a novel German CPAx e-learning were invited to participate in a voluntary, web-based, piloted, two-round survey. The two rounds were separated by 3–4 weeks to limit recollection of the two patient videos within the e-learning. Following informed consent, we collected participants’ characteristics, their CPAx ratings and scoring-duration for the two video cases, content validity indexes along with questions on the practicability of the CPAx. Data was analysed descriptively, quantitatively using Bayesian methods, and qualitatively with an inductive content approach.
Results
In total, 61 clinicians (53 (87 %) physiotherapists, 6 (10 %) nurses, 2 (3 %) occupational therapists) from Switzerland (37 (64 %)), Germany (13 (22 %)), and Austria (8 (14 %)) participated. Inter- (n = 61) and intra-rater (n = 35) reliability for the CPAx were excellent (intraclass correlation coefficients of > 0.8). Content validity index of the CPAx showed a high relevance (> 0.9), though novice users slightly differed from the expert rating (concurrent validity). Healthcare professionals described the CPAx as a practical tool to plan and evaluate physical rehabilitation with a total scoring duration of 5 min, whereby lack of routine, time, and application were seen as barriers in clinical practice.
Conclusions
This study demonstrated the German CPAx as a highly reliable (between and within raters), relevant and practical tool across professions, settings, and countries. These results support an online training, whereby future work should focus on consensus and application into clinical practice.
Implications for Clinical practice
Following an e-learning, the CPAx can be used reliably by multidisciplinary, German-speaking healthcare professionals potentially enhancing physical rehabilitation.
期刊介绍:
The aims of Intensive and Critical Care Nursing are to promote excellence of care of critically ill patients by specialist nurses and their professional colleagues; to provide an international and interdisciplinary forum for the publication, dissemination and exchange of research findings, experience and ideas; to develop and enhance the knowledge, skills, attitudes and creative thinking essential to good critical care nursing practice. The journal publishes reviews, updates and feature articles in addition to original papers and significant preliminary communications. Articles may deal with any part of practice including relevant clinical, research, educational, psychological and technological aspects.