Patterns of reflux in patients with CEAP C2 disease compared to patients with C6 venous ulceration.

Neel Gadhoke, Zoe Deol, Richard Kennedy, Sanjiv Lakhanpal, Peter J Pappas
{"title":"Patterns of reflux in patients with CEAP C2 disease compared to patients with C6 venous ulceration.","authors":"Neel Gadhoke, Zoe Deol, Richard Kennedy, Sanjiv Lakhanpal, Peter J Pappas","doi":"10.1177/02683555251317852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>CEAP categorizes patients based on disease progression and severity. Whether disease severity is associated with specific patterns of reflux is currently unknown. We hypothesize that patterns of reflux in patients with C2 and C5/6 disease will differ.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Multi-center retrospective cohort analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January 2015 to December 2020, we performed a retrospective review of reflux patterns in 21 335 patients and 31 727 limbs in symptomatic patients with C2 or C5/6 disease. Patterns of reflux in Great (GSV), Small (SSV), Deep and Perforators (Perf), were analyzed in patients with and without junctional reflux. The GSV and SSV were divided into six and three segments respectively. The number of perforators with reflux were categorized as 1-3 above and below-knee and deep system reflux was divided into three segments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 21 335 patients the average age and female/male distribution was the following: C2 (54.13 ± 13.82, 21 410/5047), C5/6 (64.75 ± 14.75, 1514/1755) (<i>p</i> ≤ .001). When SFJ reflux is present, 6-segment GSV reflux was most prevalent (C2, 14.85% vs C5/6, 27.50). Without junctional reflux, above knee reflux was more common in C2 disease, while below knee reflux was more common in C5/6 disease (<i>p</i> ≤ .01). Three segment SSV reflux was more prevalent in C2 patients (26.67% vs 16.27%, <i>p</i> ≤ .001). Below knee perforator reflux was more prevalent in C5/6 patients (79.56% vs 73.53%, <i>p</i> ≤ .01). Combined CFV/FV/POPV reflux was more prevalent in C5/6 patients (38.5% vs 20.5%, <i>p</i> ≤ .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The presence of junctional reflux is more closely associated with disease location (above- vs below-knee) than with disease classification. SFJ reflux is more likely to present with extensive above knee disease. Isolated below-knee reflux is more significantly associated with C5/6 disease, independent of junctional reflux. Conversely, isolated above-knee superficial reflux is significantly associated with C2 disease and junctional reflux.</p>","PeriodicalId":94350,"journal":{"name":"Phlebology","volume":" ","pages":"2683555251317852"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phlebology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02683555251317852","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: CEAP categorizes patients based on disease progression and severity. Whether disease severity is associated with specific patterns of reflux is currently unknown. We hypothesize that patterns of reflux in patients with C2 and C5/6 disease will differ.

Design: Multi-center retrospective cohort analysis.

Methods: From January 2015 to December 2020, we performed a retrospective review of reflux patterns in 21 335 patients and 31 727 limbs in symptomatic patients with C2 or C5/6 disease. Patterns of reflux in Great (GSV), Small (SSV), Deep and Perforators (Perf), were analyzed in patients with and without junctional reflux. The GSV and SSV were divided into six and three segments respectively. The number of perforators with reflux were categorized as 1-3 above and below-knee and deep system reflux was divided into three segments.

Results: Of the 21 335 patients the average age and female/male distribution was the following: C2 (54.13 ± 13.82, 21 410/5047), C5/6 (64.75 ± 14.75, 1514/1755) (p ≤ .001). When SFJ reflux is present, 6-segment GSV reflux was most prevalent (C2, 14.85% vs C5/6, 27.50). Without junctional reflux, above knee reflux was more common in C2 disease, while below knee reflux was more common in C5/6 disease (p ≤ .01). Three segment SSV reflux was more prevalent in C2 patients (26.67% vs 16.27%, p ≤ .001). Below knee perforator reflux was more prevalent in C5/6 patients (79.56% vs 73.53%, p ≤ .01). Combined CFV/FV/POPV reflux was more prevalent in C5/6 patients (38.5% vs 20.5%, p ≤ .001).

Conclusion: The presence of junctional reflux is more closely associated with disease location (above- vs below-knee) than with disease classification. SFJ reflux is more likely to present with extensive above knee disease. Isolated below-knee reflux is more significantly associated with C5/6 disease, independent of junctional reflux. Conversely, isolated above-knee superficial reflux is significantly associated with C2 disease and junctional reflux.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clinical outcomes following treatment for small saphenous vein insufficiency: An AVLS PRO venous registry study. Compression terms: Defining terminology of compression therapy - An international compression club consensus document. Treatment of lower limb telangiectasias with Nd: Yag 1064 nm laser with and without tumescent anesthesia - TTL technique. Comparison of staged versus one shot varicose veins treatment: Depending on tributaries diameter. Physical activity levels in patients with chronic venous insufficiency.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1