A meta-analysis on the impact of concurrent or pre-existing cancer diagnosis on acute myocardial infarction outcomes.

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-01-31 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0318437
Jie Wang, Jia Yu
{"title":"A meta-analysis on the impact of concurrent or pre-existing cancer diagnosis on acute myocardial infarction outcomes.","authors":"Jie Wang, Jia Yu","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0318437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is still a significant gap in understanding the impact of concomitant or previous cancer diagnoses on clinical outcomes of acute myocardial infarction (AMI).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To provide updated evidence on the effect of concomitant or previous cancer diagnoses on mortality and risk of complications, specifically major bleeding, myocardial reinfarction, and stroke, of patients with AMI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was conducted across PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus databases. English-language cohort studies published in peer-reviewed journals were included. Pooled effect estimates were calculated using random-effects models and reported as odds ratio (OR) or hazards ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The certainty of the evidence was assessed using the standard GRADE approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 22 studies were included. AMI patients with previous or concurrent cancer had increased risk of in-hospital mortality (OR 1.44, 95% CI: 1.20, 1.73), in-hospital mortality related to cardiovascular complications (OR 2.06, 95% CI: 1.17, 3.65), mortality at 30-days follow up (OR 1.47, 95% CI: 1.24, 1.74) and mortality at 1 year follow up (HR 2.67, 95% CI: 1.73, 4.11), compared to patients without cancer. The risk of major bleeding (OR 1.74, 95% CI: 1.40, 2.16), reinfarction (OR 1.20, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.37), and stroke (OR 1.16, 95% CI: 0.99, 1.37) was also higher in patients with previous or concurrent cancer. The certainty of evidence was rated as \"low\" for all outcomes, except for the risk of major bleeding, which was rated as \"very low.\"</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the low to very low certainty of evidence, we conclude that the presence of previous cancer diagnosis or concurrent cancer may increase the risk of adverse outcomes in patients with AMI. Early interventions, such as close monitoring of cardiac function, lifestyle modifications, and targeted pharmacological therapies, might help mitigate the risk of AMI and improve overall clinical outcomes. However, further methodologically rigorous studies are needed to validate the findings of this review.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 1","pages":"e0318437"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11785289/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0318437","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is still a significant gap in understanding the impact of concomitant or previous cancer diagnoses on clinical outcomes of acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

Objective: To provide updated evidence on the effect of concomitant or previous cancer diagnoses on mortality and risk of complications, specifically major bleeding, myocardial reinfarction, and stroke, of patients with AMI.

Methods: A literature search was conducted across PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus databases. English-language cohort studies published in peer-reviewed journals were included. Pooled effect estimates were calculated using random-effects models and reported as odds ratio (OR) or hazards ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The certainty of the evidence was assessed using the standard GRADE approach.

Results: A total of 22 studies were included. AMI patients with previous or concurrent cancer had increased risk of in-hospital mortality (OR 1.44, 95% CI: 1.20, 1.73), in-hospital mortality related to cardiovascular complications (OR 2.06, 95% CI: 1.17, 3.65), mortality at 30-days follow up (OR 1.47, 95% CI: 1.24, 1.74) and mortality at 1 year follow up (HR 2.67, 95% CI: 1.73, 4.11), compared to patients without cancer. The risk of major bleeding (OR 1.74, 95% CI: 1.40, 2.16), reinfarction (OR 1.20, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.37), and stroke (OR 1.16, 95% CI: 0.99, 1.37) was also higher in patients with previous or concurrent cancer. The certainty of evidence was rated as "low" for all outcomes, except for the risk of major bleeding, which was rated as "very low."

Conclusion: Based on the low to very low certainty of evidence, we conclude that the presence of previous cancer diagnosis or concurrent cancer may increase the risk of adverse outcomes in patients with AMI. Early interventions, such as close monitoring of cardiac function, lifestyle modifications, and targeted pharmacological therapies, might help mitigate the risk of AMI and improve overall clinical outcomes. However, further methodologically rigorous studies are needed to validate the findings of this review.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
并发或既往癌症诊断对急性心肌梗死结果影响的荟萃分析。
背景:在了解合并或既往癌症诊断对急性心肌梗死(AMI)临床结局的影响方面仍有很大的差距。目的:为AMI患者的合并或既往癌症诊断对死亡率和并发症(特别是大出血、心肌再梗死和卒中)风险的影响提供最新证据。方法:通过PubMed、EMBASE和Scopus数据库进行文献检索。发表在同行评议期刊上的英语队列研究也被纳入其中。使用随机效应模型计算合并效应估计,并以95%置信区间(CI)的优势比(OR)或风险比(HR)报告。使用标准GRADE方法评估证据的确定性。结果:共纳入22项研究。AMI患者既往或并发癌症的住院死亡率(or 1.44, 95% CI: 1.20, 1.73)、与心血管并发症相关的住院死亡率(or 2.06, 95% CI: 1.17, 3.65)、随访30天死亡率(or 1.47, 95% CI: 1.24, 1.74)和随访1年死亡率(HR 2.67, 95% CI: 1.73, 4.11)的风险均高于无癌症患者。既往或并发癌症患者发生大出血(OR 1.74, 95% CI: 1.40, 2.16)、再梗死(OR 1.20, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.37)和卒中(OR 1.16, 95% CI: 0.99, 1.37)的风险也较高。除了大出血的风险被评为“非常低”外,所有结果的证据确定性都被评为“低”。结论:基于低至极低的证据确定性,我们得出结论,既往癌症诊断或并发癌症可能会增加AMI患者不良结局的风险。早期干预,如密切监测心功能、改变生活方式和靶向药物治疗,可能有助于降低AMI的风险并改善整体临床结果。然而,需要进一步的严谨的方法学研究来验证本综述的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
期刊最新文献
High-flux hemodialysis combined with nutritional intervention: Effects on the nutritional status and clinical outcomes of patients with renal failure. Hematological parameters as predictors of complex angiographic coronary lesions in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Contact, cognition, and taiwanese youths' attitudes toward local and Chinese culture. Comparison of cognitive ability and its distribution between men with autism spectrum disorder and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Dimensionally constrained adversarial attack and defense in wind power forecasting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1