Annual versus less frequent mammographic surveillance in people with breast cancer aged 50 years and older in the UK (Mammo-50): a multicentre, randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial

Janet A Dunn, Peter Donnelly, Nada Elbeltagi, Andrea Marshall, Amy Hopkins, Alastair M Thompson, Riccardo Audisio, Sarah E Pinder, David A Cameron, Sue Hartup, Lesley Turner, Annie Young, Helen Higgins, Eila K Watson, Sophie Gasson, Peter J Barrett-Lee, Claire Hulme, Bethany Shinkins, Peter S Hall, Andrew Evans
{"title":"Annual versus less frequent mammographic surveillance in people with breast cancer aged 50 years and older in the UK (Mammo-50): a multicentre, randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial","authors":"Janet A Dunn, Peter Donnelly, Nada Elbeltagi, Andrea Marshall, Amy Hopkins, Alastair M Thompson, Riccardo Audisio, Sarah E Pinder, David A Cameron, Sue Hartup, Lesley Turner, Annie Young, Helen Higgins, Eila K Watson, Sophie Gasson, Peter J Barrett-Lee, Claire Hulme, Bethany Shinkins, Peter S Hall, Andrew Evans","doi":"10.1016/s0140-6736(24)02715-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Background</h3>The frequency of mammographic surveillance for women after diagnosis of breast cancer varies globally. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether less than annual mammography was non-inferior in terms of breast cancer-specific survival in women aged 50 years or older.<h3>Methods</h3>Mammo-50 was a multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial of annual versus less frequent mammography (2-yearly after conservation surgery; 3-yearly after a mastectomy) for women aged 50 years or older at initial diagnosis of invasive or non-invasive breast cancer and who were recurrence free 3 years post curative surgery. The trial was conducted at 114 National Health Service hospitals in the UK. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to annual or less frequent mammograms at 3 years post curative surgery and were followed up for 6 years. The co-primary outcomes were breast cancer-specific survival and cost-effectiveness. The cost-effectiveness analysis will be reported elsewhere. Breast cancer-specific survival was assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Secondary outcomes were recurrence-free interval, overall survival, and referrals back to the hospital system. 5000 women provided 90% power to detect a 3% absolute non-inferiority margin for breast cancer-specific survival with 2·5% one-sided significance. The trial was registered with the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN48534559; recruitment is complete but longer-term follow-up is ongoing.<h3>Findings</h3>Between April 22, 2014, and Sept 28, 2018, 5235 women were randomly assigned to annual mammography (n=2618) or less frequent mammography (n=2617). 3858 (73·6%) women were aged 60 years or older, 4202 (80·3%) had undergone conservation surgery, 4576 (87·4%) had invasive disease, 1159 (22·1%) had node positive disease, and 4330 (82·7%) had oestrogen receptor-positive tumours. With a median of 5·7 years follow-up (IQR 5·0–6·0; 8·7 years post curative surgery), 343 women died, including 116 who died of breast cancer (61 in the annual mammography group and 55 in the less frequent mammography group). 5-year breast cancer-specific survival was 98·1% (95% CI 97·5–98·6) in the annual mammography group and 98·3% (97·8–98·8) in the less frequent mammography group (hazard ratio 0·92, 95% CI 0·64–1·32), demonstrating non-inferiority of less frequent mammography at the pre-specified 3% margin (non-inferiority p&lt;0·0001). 5-year recurrence-free interval was 94·1% (95% CI 93·1–94·9) in the annual mammography group and 94·5% (93·5–95·3) in the less frequent mammography group. Overall survival at 5 years was 94·7% (95% CI 93·8–95·5%) and 94·5% (93·5–95·3), respectively. 224 (64·9%) of 345 breast cancer events were detected from emergency admissions or symptomatic referrals back to the hospital system, including 108 (61·7%) of 175 in the annual mammography group and 116 (68·2%) of 170 in the less frequent mammography group.<h3>Interpretation</h3>For patients aged 50 years or older and at 3 years post diagnosis, less frequent mammograms were non-inferior compared with annual mammograms for breast cancer-specific survival, recurrence-free interval, and overall survival, and should be considered for this population.<h3>Funding</h3>National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.","PeriodicalId":22898,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet","volume":"122 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(24)02715-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The frequency of mammographic surveillance for women after diagnosis of breast cancer varies globally. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether less than annual mammography was non-inferior in terms of breast cancer-specific survival in women aged 50 years or older.

Methods

Mammo-50 was a multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial of annual versus less frequent mammography (2-yearly after conservation surgery; 3-yearly after a mastectomy) for women aged 50 years or older at initial diagnosis of invasive or non-invasive breast cancer and who were recurrence free 3 years post curative surgery. The trial was conducted at 114 National Health Service hospitals in the UK. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to annual or less frequent mammograms at 3 years post curative surgery and were followed up for 6 years. The co-primary outcomes were breast cancer-specific survival and cost-effectiveness. The cost-effectiveness analysis will be reported elsewhere. Breast cancer-specific survival was assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Secondary outcomes were recurrence-free interval, overall survival, and referrals back to the hospital system. 5000 women provided 90% power to detect a 3% absolute non-inferiority margin for breast cancer-specific survival with 2·5% one-sided significance. The trial was registered with the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN48534559; recruitment is complete but longer-term follow-up is ongoing.

Findings

Between April 22, 2014, and Sept 28, 2018, 5235 women were randomly assigned to annual mammography (n=2618) or less frequent mammography (n=2617). 3858 (73·6%) women were aged 60 years or older, 4202 (80·3%) had undergone conservation surgery, 4576 (87·4%) had invasive disease, 1159 (22·1%) had node positive disease, and 4330 (82·7%) had oestrogen receptor-positive tumours. With a median of 5·7 years follow-up (IQR 5·0–6·0; 8·7 years post curative surgery), 343 women died, including 116 who died of breast cancer (61 in the annual mammography group and 55 in the less frequent mammography group). 5-year breast cancer-specific survival was 98·1% (95% CI 97·5–98·6) in the annual mammography group and 98·3% (97·8–98·8) in the less frequent mammography group (hazard ratio 0·92, 95% CI 0·64–1·32), demonstrating non-inferiority of less frequent mammography at the pre-specified 3% margin (non-inferiority p<0·0001). 5-year recurrence-free interval was 94·1% (95% CI 93·1–94·9) in the annual mammography group and 94·5% (93·5–95·3) in the less frequent mammography group. Overall survival at 5 years was 94·7% (95% CI 93·8–95·5%) and 94·5% (93·5–95·3), respectively. 224 (64·9%) of 345 breast cancer events were detected from emergency admissions or symptomatic referrals back to the hospital system, including 108 (61·7%) of 175 in the annual mammography group and 116 (68·2%) of 170 in the less frequent mammography group.

Interpretation

For patients aged 50 years or older and at 3 years post diagnosis, less frequent mammograms were non-inferior compared with annual mammograms for breast cancer-specific survival, recurrence-free interval, and overall survival, and should be considered for this population.

Funding

National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Lancet Commission on Transforming Primary Health Care in the Post-COVID-19 Era A new pathway for primary aldosteronism treatment Health-care system adaptability during wildfire disasters: crucial insights from LA County Endoscopic, ultrasound-guided, radiofrequency ablation of aldosterone-producing adenomas (FABULAS): a UK, multicentre, prospective, proof-of-concept trial Angola's cholera outbreak: a wake-up call for global action
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1