Annual versus less frequent mammographic surveillance in people with breast cancer aged 50 years and older in the UK (Mammo-50): a multicentre, randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial

Janet A Dunn, Peter Donnelly, Nada Elbeltagi, Andrea Marshall, Amy Hopkins, Alastair M Thompson, Riccardo Audisio, Sarah E Pinder, David A Cameron, Sue Hartup, Lesley Turner, Annie Young, Helen Higgins, Eila K Watson, Sophie Gasson, Peter J Barrett-Lee, Claire Hulme, Bethany Shinkins, Peter S Hall, Andrew Evans
{"title":"Annual versus less frequent mammographic surveillance in people with breast cancer aged 50 years and older in the UK (Mammo-50): a multicentre, randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial","authors":"Janet A Dunn, Peter Donnelly, Nada Elbeltagi, Andrea Marshall, Amy Hopkins, Alastair M Thompson, Riccardo Audisio, Sarah E Pinder, David A Cameron, Sue Hartup, Lesley Turner, Annie Young, Helen Higgins, Eila K Watson, Sophie Gasson, Peter J Barrett-Lee, Claire Hulme, Bethany Shinkins, Peter S Hall, Andrew Evans","doi":"10.1016/s0140-6736(24)02715-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Background</h3>The frequency of mammographic surveillance for women after diagnosis of breast cancer varies globally. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether less than annual mammography was non-inferior in terms of breast cancer-specific survival in women aged 50 years or older.<h3>Methods</h3>Mammo-50 was a multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial of annual versus less frequent mammography (2-yearly after conservation surgery; 3-yearly after a mastectomy) for women aged 50 years or older at initial diagnosis of invasive or non-invasive breast cancer and who were recurrence free 3 years post curative surgery. The trial was conducted at 114 National Health Service hospitals in the UK. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to annual or less frequent mammograms at 3 years post curative surgery and were followed up for 6 years. The co-primary outcomes were breast cancer-specific survival and cost-effectiveness. The cost-effectiveness analysis will be reported elsewhere. Breast cancer-specific survival was assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Secondary outcomes were recurrence-free interval, overall survival, and referrals back to the hospital system. 5000 women provided 90% power to detect a 3% absolute non-inferiority margin for breast cancer-specific survival with 2·5% one-sided significance. The trial was registered with the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN48534559; recruitment is complete but longer-term follow-up is ongoing.<h3>Findings</h3>Between April 22, 2014, and Sept 28, 2018, 5235 women were randomly assigned to annual mammography (n=2618) or less frequent mammography (n=2617). 3858 (73·6%) women were aged 60 years or older, 4202 (80·3%) had undergone conservation surgery, 4576 (87·4%) had invasive disease, 1159 (22·1%) had node positive disease, and 4330 (82·7%) had oestrogen receptor-positive tumours. With a median of 5·7 years follow-up (IQR 5·0–6·0; 8·7 years post curative surgery), 343 women died, including 116 who died of breast cancer (61 in the annual mammography group and 55 in the less frequent mammography group). 5-year breast cancer-specific survival was 98·1% (95% CI 97·5–98·6) in the annual mammography group and 98·3% (97·8–98·8) in the less frequent mammography group (hazard ratio 0·92, 95% CI 0·64–1·32), demonstrating non-inferiority of less frequent mammography at the pre-specified 3% margin (non-inferiority p&lt;0·0001). 5-year recurrence-free interval was 94·1% (95% CI 93·1–94·9) in the annual mammography group and 94·5% (93·5–95·3) in the less frequent mammography group. Overall survival at 5 years was 94·7% (95% CI 93·8–95·5%) and 94·5% (93·5–95·3), respectively. 224 (64·9%) of 345 breast cancer events were detected from emergency admissions or symptomatic referrals back to the hospital system, including 108 (61·7%) of 175 in the annual mammography group and 116 (68·2%) of 170 in the less frequent mammography group.<h3>Interpretation</h3>For patients aged 50 years or older and at 3 years post diagnosis, less frequent mammograms were non-inferior compared with annual mammograms for breast cancer-specific survival, recurrence-free interval, and overall survival, and should be considered for this population.<h3>Funding</h3>National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.","PeriodicalId":22898,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet","volume":"122 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(24)02715-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The frequency of mammographic surveillance for women after diagnosis of breast cancer varies globally. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether less than annual mammography was non-inferior in terms of breast cancer-specific survival in women aged 50 years or older.

Methods

Mammo-50 was a multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial of annual versus less frequent mammography (2-yearly after conservation surgery; 3-yearly after a mastectomy) for women aged 50 years or older at initial diagnosis of invasive or non-invasive breast cancer and who were recurrence free 3 years post curative surgery. The trial was conducted at 114 National Health Service hospitals in the UK. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to annual or less frequent mammograms at 3 years post curative surgery and were followed up for 6 years. The co-primary outcomes were breast cancer-specific survival and cost-effectiveness. The cost-effectiveness analysis will be reported elsewhere. Breast cancer-specific survival was assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Secondary outcomes were recurrence-free interval, overall survival, and referrals back to the hospital system. 5000 women provided 90% power to detect a 3% absolute non-inferiority margin for breast cancer-specific survival with 2·5% one-sided significance. The trial was registered with the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN48534559; recruitment is complete but longer-term follow-up is ongoing.

Findings

Between April 22, 2014, and Sept 28, 2018, 5235 women were randomly assigned to annual mammography (n=2618) or less frequent mammography (n=2617). 3858 (73·6%) women were aged 60 years or older, 4202 (80·3%) had undergone conservation surgery, 4576 (87·4%) had invasive disease, 1159 (22·1%) had node positive disease, and 4330 (82·7%) had oestrogen receptor-positive tumours. With a median of 5·7 years follow-up (IQR 5·0–6·0; 8·7 years post curative surgery), 343 women died, including 116 who died of breast cancer (61 in the annual mammography group and 55 in the less frequent mammography group). 5-year breast cancer-specific survival was 98·1% (95% CI 97·5–98·6) in the annual mammography group and 98·3% (97·8–98·8) in the less frequent mammography group (hazard ratio 0·92, 95% CI 0·64–1·32), demonstrating non-inferiority of less frequent mammography at the pre-specified 3% margin (non-inferiority p<0·0001). 5-year recurrence-free interval was 94·1% (95% CI 93·1–94·9) in the annual mammography group and 94·5% (93·5–95·3) in the less frequent mammography group. Overall survival at 5 years was 94·7% (95% CI 93·8–95·5%) and 94·5% (93·5–95·3), respectively. 224 (64·9%) of 345 breast cancer events were detected from emergency admissions or symptomatic referrals back to the hospital system, including 108 (61·7%) of 175 in the annual mammography group and 116 (68·2%) of 170 in the less frequent mammography group.

Interpretation

For patients aged 50 years or older and at 3 years post diagnosis, less frequent mammograms were non-inferior compared with annual mammograms for breast cancer-specific survival, recurrence-free interval, and overall survival, and should be considered for this population.

Funding

National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在英国,50岁及以上乳腺癌患者的年度与不频繁的乳房x光检查(乳腺x光检查-50):一项多中心、随机、3期、非劣效性试验
背景乳腺癌诊断后女性的乳房x光检查频率在全球范围内有所不同。这项研究的目的是评估在50岁或以上的女性中,少于每年一次的乳房x光检查是否在乳腺癌特异性生存率方面不差。方法smammo -50是一项多中心,随机,3期试验,每年与不太频繁的乳房x光检查(保守手术后2年;(3年,乳房切除术后)年龄在50岁或以上,初次诊断为浸润性或非浸润性乳腺癌,术后3年无复发的妇女。这项试验在英国114家国家卫生服务医院进行。参与者被随机分配(1:1)在治愈手术后3年进行年度或更少频率的乳房x光检查,并随访6年。共同主要结局是乳腺癌特异性生存和成本效益。成本效益分析将在其他地方报告。在意向治疗人群中评估乳腺癌特异性生存率。次要结局是无复发间期、总生存期和转回医院系统。5000名女性提供了90%的能力来检测3%的乳腺癌特异性生存绝对非劣效性裕度,具有2.5%的单侧显著性。该试验已在ISRCTN注册中心注册,注册号为ISRCTN48534559;征聘工作已完成,但长期后续工作正在进行中。在2014年4月22日至2018年9月28日期间,5235名女性被随机分配到每年一次的乳房x光检查(n=2618)或不太频繁的乳房x光检查(n=2617)。3858名(73.6%)60岁及以上妇女,4202名(803%)接受过保守手术,4576名(87.4%)患有侵袭性疾病,1159名(22.1%)患有淋巴结阳性疾病,4330名(82.7%)患有雌激素受体阳性肿瘤。中位随访5.7年(IQR 5.0 - 6.0;手术治愈后8.7年),343名妇女死亡,其中116名死于乳腺癌(每年乳房x光检查组61名,不常乳房x光检查组55名)。每年一次乳房x光检查组的5年乳腺癌特异性生存率为98.1% (95% CI为97.5 - 98.6),较少频率乳房x光检查组的5年乳腺癌特异性生存率为98.3%(97.8 - 98.8)(风险比为0.92,95% CI为0.64 - 1.32),表明较少频率乳房x光检查在预先规定的3%范围内是非劣效性的(非劣效性p<; 0.0001)。每年一次乳房x光检查组的5年无复发间隔为94.1% (95% CI 93.1 ~ 99.4),不经常乳房x光检查组的5年无复发间隔为94.5% (95% CI 93.5 ~ 95.3)。5年总生存率分别为94.7% (95% CI 93.8 ~ 95.5%)和94.5%(93.5 ~ 93.5)。345例乳腺癌事件中有224例(64.9%)是在急诊入院或有症状转诊回医院系统时发现的,其中175例中每年乳房x光检查组有108例(61.7%),170例中不经常乳房x光检查组有116例(68.2%)。对于年龄在50岁或以上的患者,在诊断后3年,与每年一次的乳房x光检查相比,乳腺癌特异性生存率、无复发间隔和总生存率并不差,应该考虑这一人群。资助国家卫生研究所卫生技术评估方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bill Foege: building global health coalitions with compassion Offline: The human consequences of Epic Fury 5-year results of hypofractionated locoregional radiotherapy in early breast cancer HypoG-01 (UNICANCER): a French multicentre, randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3, open-label, controlled trial. Offline: The silent torment of Casey Means. Ultra-processed foods in research and policy - Authors' reply.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1