S. Rossi, G Capson-Tojo, A. Sànchez-Zurano, D. Carecci, D.J. Batstone, G. Acìén-Fernandez, E. Ficara
{"title":"Recent advances and challenges in mechanistic modelling of photosynthetic processes for wastewater treatment","authors":"S. Rossi, G Capson-Tojo, A. Sànchez-Zurano, D. Carecci, D.J. Batstone, G. Acìén-Fernandez, E. Ficara","doi":"10.1016/j.watres.2025.123216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Phototrophy-based wastewater treatment has the potential to reduce wastewater bioremediation costs, improving environmental impacts and allowing for enhanced resource recovery. Microbial interactions occurring in phototrophic-chemotrophic consortia treating wastewater are particularly complex, and with varying impact on each clade by different chemical, biological and physical, including light—related factors. For this reason, mechanistic mathematical modelling of these systems is challenging, and the resulting models are especially complex. In this work, we focus particularly on the extension of microalgae-focused models to simulation of phototrophic-chemotrophic systems, especially as for (i) microalgae-bacteria and (ii) purple bacteria-enriched communities. The review identifies model structures and typical modelling choices, as well as the potential applications and limitations of available experimental protocols for model calibration, identifying relevant research needs and requirements. Simplified models have been proposed, which allows assessment of dominating mechanisms, but may not represent more complex behaviour, including nutrient removal and response to light cycling, and have been largely applied to simple (oxygen and carbon dioxide) exchange between algae and aerobic heterotrophs. More comprehensive models including all relevant microbial clades have been recently published, which consider nutrient cycling, competitive uptake, and other features, including temperature, pH, and gas transfer. These models have comparable structures but can be difficult to compare in a quantitative manner, often due to different fundamental stoichiometry (e.g., in the assumed algae composition), or in differing approaches to storage compounds. Particularly for models with a high complexity, it is often difficult to properly estimate biokinetic species-specific parameters for the different phototrophic and chemotrophic populations involved. Several methods have been proposed for model calibration, among which photo-respirometry has shown high potential. Photo-respirometric methods do not follow a standardised approach, which has limited their application and comparability between studies. Finally, the validation of models on long term data sets, demonstrating the impact of seasonality, as well as long term population adaptation is rare.","PeriodicalId":443,"journal":{"name":"Water Research","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2025.123216","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Phototrophy-based wastewater treatment has the potential to reduce wastewater bioremediation costs, improving environmental impacts and allowing for enhanced resource recovery. Microbial interactions occurring in phototrophic-chemotrophic consortia treating wastewater are particularly complex, and with varying impact on each clade by different chemical, biological and physical, including light—related factors. For this reason, mechanistic mathematical modelling of these systems is challenging, and the resulting models are especially complex. In this work, we focus particularly on the extension of microalgae-focused models to simulation of phototrophic-chemotrophic systems, especially as for (i) microalgae-bacteria and (ii) purple bacteria-enriched communities. The review identifies model structures and typical modelling choices, as well as the potential applications and limitations of available experimental protocols for model calibration, identifying relevant research needs and requirements. Simplified models have been proposed, which allows assessment of dominating mechanisms, but may not represent more complex behaviour, including nutrient removal and response to light cycling, and have been largely applied to simple (oxygen and carbon dioxide) exchange between algae and aerobic heterotrophs. More comprehensive models including all relevant microbial clades have been recently published, which consider nutrient cycling, competitive uptake, and other features, including temperature, pH, and gas transfer. These models have comparable structures but can be difficult to compare in a quantitative manner, often due to different fundamental stoichiometry (e.g., in the assumed algae composition), or in differing approaches to storage compounds. Particularly for models with a high complexity, it is often difficult to properly estimate biokinetic species-specific parameters for the different phototrophic and chemotrophic populations involved. Several methods have been proposed for model calibration, among which photo-respirometry has shown high potential. Photo-respirometric methods do not follow a standardised approach, which has limited their application and comparability between studies. Finally, the validation of models on long term data sets, demonstrating the impact of seasonality, as well as long term population adaptation is rare.
期刊介绍:
Water Research, along with its open access companion journal Water Research X, serves as a platform for publishing original research papers covering various aspects of the science and technology related to the anthropogenic water cycle, water quality, and its management worldwide. The audience targeted by the journal comprises biologists, chemical engineers, chemists, civil engineers, environmental engineers, limnologists, and microbiologists. The scope of the journal include:
•Treatment processes for water and wastewaters (municipal, agricultural, industrial, and on-site treatment), including resource recovery and residuals management;
•Urban hydrology including sewer systems, stormwater management, and green infrastructure;
•Drinking water treatment and distribution;
•Potable and non-potable water reuse;
•Sanitation, public health, and risk assessment;
•Anaerobic digestion, solid and hazardous waste management, including source characterization and the effects and control of leachates and gaseous emissions;
•Contaminants (chemical, microbial, anthropogenic particles such as nanoparticles or microplastics) and related water quality sensing, monitoring, fate, and assessment;
•Anthropogenic impacts on inland, tidal, coastal and urban waters, focusing on surface and ground waters, and point and non-point sources of pollution;
•Environmental restoration, linked to surface water, groundwater and groundwater remediation;
•Analysis of the interfaces between sediments and water, and between water and atmosphere, focusing specifically on anthropogenic impacts;
•Mathematical modelling, systems analysis, machine learning, and beneficial use of big data related to the anthropogenic water cycle;
•Socio-economic, policy, and regulations studies.