Detection rate of herpes simplex virus DNA in the lower respiratory tract of critical care patients with or without coinfection determined by the Biofire® pneumonia plus panel.
Sofía Cano, María Ángeles Clari, Eliseo Albert, Elena Villar, Beatriz Quevedo Sánchez, Nieves Carbonell, David Navarro
{"title":"Detection rate of herpes simplex virus DNA in the lower respiratory tract of critical care patients with or without coinfection determined by the Biofire® pneumonia plus panel.","authors":"Sofía Cano, María Ángeles Clari, Eliseo Albert, Elena Villar, Beatriz Quevedo Sánchez, Nieves Carbonell, David Navarro","doi":"10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2025.116721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We investigated whether the results returned by the Biofire® Pneumonia Plus Panel (FA-PP) in lower respiratory tract specimens (LRT) specimens may identify patients who should be targeted for Herpes simplex virus (HSV) DNA testing. We included 35 adult ICU patients who underwent protocolized HSV DNA testing in LRT and/or plasma specimens by real-time PCR. Of these, one patient underwent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation, one a kidney transplantation and one was under CAR-T cell therapy. Twenty-three of the 33 patients (69.6 %) had HSV-type 1 (HSV-1) DNA detected in LRT specimens (median viral load: 5.67 log<sub>10</sub> copies/ml). Viral DNA was detected in 12/14 (85 %) plasma samples (median, 3.4 log<sub>10</sub> copies/ml) from patients with HSV-1 DNA present in LRT specimens. Patients testing positive by the FA-PP had a non-significant (P = 0.28) higher rate of HSV-1 DNA detection (10/13; 77 %) compared with patients returning negative results (9/16; 56 %). In conclusion, requests for HSV DNA testing in ICU patients should not depend on the results of conventional culture methods nor those provided by the FA-PP.</p>","PeriodicalId":11329,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease","volume":"111 3","pages":"116721"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2025.116721","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We investigated whether the results returned by the Biofire® Pneumonia Plus Panel (FA-PP) in lower respiratory tract specimens (LRT) specimens may identify patients who should be targeted for Herpes simplex virus (HSV) DNA testing. We included 35 adult ICU patients who underwent protocolized HSV DNA testing in LRT and/or plasma specimens by real-time PCR. Of these, one patient underwent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation, one a kidney transplantation and one was under CAR-T cell therapy. Twenty-three of the 33 patients (69.6 %) had HSV-type 1 (HSV-1) DNA detected in LRT specimens (median viral load: 5.67 log10 copies/ml). Viral DNA was detected in 12/14 (85 %) plasma samples (median, 3.4 log10 copies/ml) from patients with HSV-1 DNA present in LRT specimens. Patients testing positive by the FA-PP had a non-significant (P = 0.28) higher rate of HSV-1 DNA detection (10/13; 77 %) compared with patients returning negative results (9/16; 56 %). In conclusion, requests for HSV DNA testing in ICU patients should not depend on the results of conventional culture methods nor those provided by the FA-PP.
期刊介绍:
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease keeps you informed of the latest developments in clinical microbiology and the diagnosis and treatment of infectious diseases. Packed with rigorously peer-reviewed articles and studies in bacteriology, immunology, immunoserology, infectious diseases, mycology, parasitology, and virology, the journal examines new procedures, unusual cases, controversial issues, and important new literature. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease distinguished independent editorial board, consisting of experts from many medical specialties, ensures you extensive and authoritative coverage.