Whole grain intake among young children ages 12 to 48 months participating in the Feeding Infants and Toddlers Study was higher in 2016 compared to 2008

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Nutrition Research Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-07 DOI:10.1016/j.nutres.2024.12.007
Melissa C. Kay , Andrea Anater , Joanne Guthrie , Joel Hampton , Mary Story
{"title":"Whole grain intake among young children ages 12 to 48 months participating in the Feeding Infants and Toddlers Study was higher in 2016 compared to 2008","authors":"Melissa C. Kay ,&nbsp;Andrea Anater ,&nbsp;Joanne Guthrie ,&nbsp;Joel Hampton ,&nbsp;Mary Story","doi":"10.1016/j.nutres.2024.12.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Consumption of whole grains confers multiple benefits and is an important source of fiber; as such, federal programs have updated policies to support increased whole grain consumption. Limited literature is available on consumption among young children and before and after nutrition policy changes. We assessed whole grain and fiber consumption among children aged 12 to 47.9 months participating in the Feeding Infants and Toddlers Study 2008 (<em>n</em> = 2385) and 2016 (<em>n</em> = 1733) to address this information gap. The percent consuming whole grains was determined using predicted marginals and compared between years using <em>t</em>-tests from weighted logistic regression. For children consuming whole grains, the Usual Intake method was used to estimate mean grams of whole grains and fiber intake from whole grains. Models were adjusted for child age, sex, race and ethnicity, and total energy intake, and household poverty level, caregiver education, marital status, ever breastfed, and Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children status. A higher percentage of children consumed whole grain foods in 2016 compared to 2008 (74.4%, standard error [SE] 0.02 vs. 65.2%, SE 0.02; <em>P</em> = .0001) and they ate a greater amount of whole grains (23.4 g, SE 0.32 vs. 19.1 g, SE 0.23, <em>P</em> &lt; .0001). Children in 2016 consumed 30.8% more fiber from whole grains compared to children from 2008 (<em>P</em> &lt; .0001). Grams of whole grains consumed from sweet bakery items and cereal/nutrition bars (<em>P</em> = .0003) and baby food cereal (<em>P</em> = .0123) were significantly higher in 2016 compared to 2008. Whole grain consumption among young children aged 12 to 47.9 months was higher in 2016 compared to 2008, providing more dietary fiber. Despite promising changes between 2008 and 2016, many young children in 2016 were still falling short of meeting whole grain recommendations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19245,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition Research","volume":"135 ","pages":"Pages 1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0271531724001672","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Consumption of whole grains confers multiple benefits and is an important source of fiber; as such, federal programs have updated policies to support increased whole grain consumption. Limited literature is available on consumption among young children and before and after nutrition policy changes. We assessed whole grain and fiber consumption among children aged 12 to 47.9 months participating in the Feeding Infants and Toddlers Study 2008 (n = 2385) and 2016 (n = 1733) to address this information gap. The percent consuming whole grains was determined using predicted marginals and compared between years using t-tests from weighted logistic regression. For children consuming whole grains, the Usual Intake method was used to estimate mean grams of whole grains and fiber intake from whole grains. Models were adjusted for child age, sex, race and ethnicity, and total energy intake, and household poverty level, caregiver education, marital status, ever breastfed, and Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children status. A higher percentage of children consumed whole grain foods in 2016 compared to 2008 (74.4%, standard error [SE] 0.02 vs. 65.2%, SE 0.02; P = .0001) and they ate a greater amount of whole grains (23.4 g, SE 0.32 vs. 19.1 g, SE 0.23, P < .0001). Children in 2016 consumed 30.8% more fiber from whole grains compared to children from 2008 (P < .0001). Grams of whole grains consumed from sweet bakery items and cereal/nutrition bars (P = .0003) and baby food cereal (P = .0123) were significantly higher in 2016 compared to 2008. Whole grain consumption among young children aged 12 to 47.9 months was higher in 2016 compared to 2008, providing more dietary fiber. Despite promising changes between 2008 and 2016, many young children in 2016 were still falling short of meeting whole grain recommendations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与2008年相比,2016年参与喂养婴幼儿研究的12至48个月的幼儿的全谷物摄入量更高。
食用全谷物有多种好处,是纤维的重要来源;因此,联邦计划更新了政策,以支持增加全谷物消费。关于幼儿消费和营养政策改变前后的文献有限。我们评估了参加2008年(n = 2385)和2016年(n = 1733)喂养婴幼儿研究的12至47.9个月儿童的全谷物和纤维摄入量,以解决这一信息差距。食用全谷物的百分比使用预测边际来确定,并使用加权逻辑回归的t检验来比较年份。对于食用全谷物的儿童,通常的摄入方法被用来估计全谷物的平均克数和从全谷物中摄入的纤维。根据儿童年龄、性别、种族和民族、总能量摄入、家庭贫困水平、照顾者教育程度、婚姻状况、是否母乳喂养以及妇女、婴儿和儿童特殊补充营养计划状况对模型进行了调整。与2008年相比,2016年食用全谷物食品的儿童比例更高(74.4%,标准误差[SE] 0.02比65.2%,标准差0.02;P = 0.0001),他们吃了更多的全谷物(23.4 g, SE 0.32 vs. 19.1 g, SE 0.23, P < 0.0001)。与2008年的儿童相比,2016年的儿童从全谷物中摄入的纤维增加了30.8% (P < 0.0001)。与2008年相比,2016年从甜烘焙食品和谷物/营养棒(P = 0.0003)以及婴儿食品谷物(P = 0.0123)中消耗的全谷物克数显著增加。与2008年相比,2016年12至47.9个月的幼儿的全谷物消费量更高,提供了更多的膳食纤维。尽管2008年至2016年间发生了可喜的变化,但2016年许多幼儿仍未达到全谷物建议摄入量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nutrition Research
Nutrition Research 医学-营养学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
2.20%
发文量
107
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nutrition Research publishes original research articles, communications, and reviews on basic and applied nutrition. The mission of Nutrition Research is to serve as the journal for global communication of nutrition and life sciences research on diet and health. The field of nutrition sciences includes, but is not limited to, the study of nutrients during growth, reproduction, aging, health, and disease. Articles covering basic and applied research on all aspects of nutrition sciences are encouraged, including: nutritional biochemistry and metabolism; metabolomics, nutrient gene interactions; nutrient requirements for health; nutrition and disease; digestion and absorption; nutritional anthropology; epidemiology; the influence of socioeconomic and cultural factors on nutrition of the individual and the community; the impact of nutrient intake on disease response and behavior; the consequences of nutritional deficiency on growth and development, endocrine and nervous systems, and immunity; nutrition and gut microbiota; food intolerance and allergy; nutrient drug interactions; nutrition and aging; nutrition and cancer; obesity; diabetes; and intervention programs.
期刊最新文献
Stearidonic acid (18:4n-3): Sources, metabolism, and health effects—a systematic review Betaine inhibited adipogenesis in 3T3-L1 preadipocytes and alleviated obesity-related disorders in high-fat diet-fed C57BL/6 mice by modulating gut microbiota composition Higher dietary omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid intake is associated with reduced all-cause mortality in cancer survivors: A prospective cohort study Infrequent breakfast consumption and lower weekly meal frequency are associated with poor muscle health in Korean older adults Higher serum concentrations of myristoleic acid, gadoleic acid, erucic acid, and nervonic acid, along with a lower concentration of palmitoleic acid, are associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1