Exploring augmentative & alternative communication assessment practices for children with limited functional speech & motor skills: a scoping review utilizing the Participation Model of AAC.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1080/17483107.2025.2454253
Juno Coan-Brill, Gail Teachman, F Aileen Costigan, Theresa Pham, B J Cunningham
{"title":"Exploring augmentative & alternative communication assessment practices for children with limited functional speech & motor skills: a scoping review utilizing the Participation Model of AAC.","authors":"Juno Coan-Brill, Gail Teachman, F Aileen Costigan, Theresa Pham, B J Cunningham","doi":"10.1080/17483107.2025.2454253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Children with limited speech and motor function, frequently subsequent to neurodevelopmental conditions, often require augmentative and alternative communication (AAC). Assessment practices to inform effective AAC interventions for these children can be challenging because of the considerable heterogeneity and range of factors that require consideration. An improved understanding of current assessment practices is imperative to optimize the provision of AAC.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a scoping review to identify the assessment practices used with children with limited speech and motor function subsequent to neurodevelopmental conditions (birth to 18 years) within the Participation Model of AAC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 171 assessment practices were identified. Almost all were related to access supports and barriers, of which the majority focused on children's capabilities. Relatively few methods were identified to support the assessment of children's participation patterns and communication needs or opportunity supports and barriers. Twenty-three percent of identified formal assessment practices required modifications to established procedures, and 10% could not be completed by all child participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Identified assessment practices focused primarily on children and their abilities, whereas very few focused on external factors (e.g., environmental and opportunity supports and barriers). Additionally, identified assessment practices may inaccurately measure the abilities of children with limited speech and motor function, as the procedures often required modification.</p><p><p>IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONWithout adequate practices to assess all areas of the Participation Model, clinicians may have difficulty providing comprehensive AAC servicesFuture research should focus on developing practices to assess children's opportunity and environmental supports and barriersThere is a need for practices that are more accessible to children with limited speech and motor function.</p>","PeriodicalId":47806,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","volume":" ","pages":"1272-1295"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2025.2454253","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Children with limited speech and motor function, frequently subsequent to neurodevelopmental conditions, often require augmentative and alternative communication (AAC). Assessment practices to inform effective AAC interventions for these children can be challenging because of the considerable heterogeneity and range of factors that require consideration. An improved understanding of current assessment practices is imperative to optimize the provision of AAC.

Materials and methods: We conducted a scoping review to identify the assessment practices used with children with limited speech and motor function subsequent to neurodevelopmental conditions (birth to 18 years) within the Participation Model of AAC.

Results: In total, 171 assessment practices were identified. Almost all were related to access supports and barriers, of which the majority focused on children's capabilities. Relatively few methods were identified to support the assessment of children's participation patterns and communication needs or opportunity supports and barriers. Twenty-three percent of identified formal assessment practices required modifications to established procedures, and 10% could not be completed by all child participants.

Conclusion: Identified assessment practices focused primarily on children and their abilities, whereas very few focused on external factors (e.g., environmental and opportunity supports and barriers). Additionally, identified assessment practices may inaccurately measure the abilities of children with limited speech and motor function, as the procedures often required modification.

IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONWithout adequate practices to assess all areas of the Participation Model, clinicians may have difficulty providing comprehensive AAC servicesFuture research should focus on developing practices to assess children's opportunity and environmental supports and barriersThere is a need for practices that are more accessible to children with limited speech and motor function.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索功能性语言和运动技能有限的儿童的增强和替代沟通评估实践:利用AAC参与模型的范围审查。
目的:言语和运动功能受限的儿童,通常在神经发育条件下,通常需要辅助和替代交流(AAC)。为这些儿童提供有效的AAC干预措施的评估实践可能具有挑战性,因为需要考虑的因素具有相当大的异质性和范围。提高对当前评估做法的理解对于优化审计咨询的提供至关重要。材料和方法:我们进行了一项范围综述,以确定在AAC参与模型中用于神经发育状况(出生至18岁)后言语和运动功能受限儿童的评估实践。结果:总共确定了171个评估实践。几乎所有这些都与获得支助和障碍有关,其中大多数侧重于儿童的能力。确定了相对较少的方法来支持评估儿童的参与模式和交流需要或机会支持和障碍。已确定的正式评估实践中有23%需要修改既定程序,10%不能由所有儿童参与者完成。结论:已确定的评估实践主要关注儿童及其能力,而很少关注外部因素(例如,环境和机会支持和障碍)。此外,已确定的评估方法可能不准确地衡量言语和运动功能有限的儿童的能力,因为程序通常需要修改。对康复的影响如果没有足够的实践来评估参与模式的所有领域,临床医生可能难以提供全面的AAC服务。未来的研究应侧重于开发实践来评估儿童的机会和环境支持和障碍。需要对语言和运动功能有限的儿童更容易获得的实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
13.60%
发文量
128
期刊最新文献
Sustained use of compensatory technology following brain injury: experiences from Neumind users. A case report on gait in spinocerebellar ataxia: evaluating the use of mixed reality from independent walking to integrated physical support. Fidelity of power mobility interventions for young children with disabilities: a systematic review. Design and development of a hybrid device to assist frail users in mobility, transfer and rehabilitation. Do first impressions matter? Comparing overall impression vs. individual item scores to make informed decisions on AAC apps.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1