Tight Control and Radiological Progression: The Radiographic Outcomes of the TICOPA Study.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY Journal of Rheumatology Pub Date : 2025-02-15 DOI:10.3899/jrheum.2024-1035
Lija James, Philip S Helliwell, Elizabeth M A Hensor, Philip G Conaghan, Paul Emery, Laura C Coates
{"title":"Tight Control and Radiological Progression: The Radiographic Outcomes of the TICOPA Study.","authors":"Lija James, Philip S Helliwell, Elizabeth M A Hensor, Philip G Conaghan, Paul Emery, Laura C Coates","doi":"10.3899/jrheum.2024-1035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Tight Control of Psoriatic Arthritis (TICOPA) study was the first to undertake the treat-to-target approach in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Our aim was to further investigate the radiographic changes in the TICOPA study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The TICOPA trial recruited patients with early treatment-naïve PsA. Plain radiographs of the hands and feet were taken at weeks 0 and 48. Clinical outcomes were recorded by a blinded assessor every 12 weeks. In post hoc analysis, bootstrapped quantile regression, adjusting for baseline values and minimization factors, was used to compare radiographic scores (modified Sharp/van der Heijde [mSvdH]), defined according to treatment arm or disease activity states.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Paired baseline and week 48 radiographs were available for 169/206 (82%) at week 48 (84 tight control [TC] arm, 85 standard care [StdC] arm). There was no difference in change in total mSvdH score seen with TC compared to StdC (median [IQR] 0.0 [-2.0 to 0.5] vs 0.0 [-2.0 to 0.0]; difference 0.0 [95% CI 0.0-0.0]). Median total mSvdH score change was lower in those achieving minimal disease activity, Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis remission, and very low disease activity. The number of people with radiographic progression (total erosion score of ≥ 2 at week 48) was numerically lower in the TC group (5/84 [5.9%] vs 12/85 [14.1%]). Patients with radiographical progression presented with polyarticular disease and high C-reactive protein, and had poorer clinical outcomes at weeks 12 and 24.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These data confirm the benefit of achieving low disease activity states on subsequent radiographic outcomes but did not show a significant impact related to a TC management approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":50064,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.2024-1035","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The Tight Control of Psoriatic Arthritis (TICOPA) study was the first to undertake the treat-to-target approach in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Our aim was to further investigate the radiographic changes in the TICOPA study.

Methods: The TICOPA trial recruited patients with early treatment-naïve PsA. Plain radiographs of the hands and feet were taken at weeks 0 and 48. Clinical outcomes were recorded by a blinded assessor every 12 weeks. In post hoc analysis, bootstrapped quantile regression, adjusting for baseline values and minimization factors, was used to compare radiographic scores (modified Sharp/van der Heijde [mSvdH]), defined according to treatment arm or disease activity states.

Results: Paired baseline and week 48 radiographs were available for 169/206 (82%) at week 48 (84 tight control [TC] arm, 85 standard care [StdC] arm). There was no difference in change in total mSvdH score seen with TC compared to StdC (median [IQR] 0.0 [-2.0 to 0.5] vs 0.0 [-2.0 to 0.0]; difference 0.0 [95% CI 0.0-0.0]). Median total mSvdH score change was lower in those achieving minimal disease activity, Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis remission, and very low disease activity. The number of people with radiographic progression (total erosion score of ≥ 2 at week 48) was numerically lower in the TC group (5/84 [5.9%] vs 12/85 [14.1%]). Patients with radiographical progression presented with polyarticular disease and high C-reactive protein, and had poorer clinical outcomes at weeks 12 and 24.

Conclusion: These data confirm the benefit of achieving low disease activity states on subsequent radiographic outcomes but did not show a significant impact related to a TC management approach.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Rheumatology
Journal of Rheumatology 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.10%
发文量
285
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rheumatology is a monthly international serial edited by Earl D. Silverman. The Journal features research articles on clinical subjects from scientists working in rheumatology and related fields, as well as proceedings of meetings as supplements to regular issues. Highlights of our 41 years serving Rheumatology include: groundbreaking and provocative editorials such as "Inverting the Pyramid," renowned Pediatric Rheumatology, proceedings of OMERACT and the Canadian Rheumatology Association, Cochrane Musculoskeletal Reviews, and supplements on emerging therapies.
期刊最新文献
Tight Control and Radiological Progression: The Radiographic Outcomes of the TICOPA Study. Lived Education Experience of Young Adults With Childhood- and Adult-Onset Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Multicenter Canadian Qualitative Study. Urine Protein Tests in Systematic Lupus Erythematosus: What Do They Mean? A Dromedary Tale: A Tragi-Comedary on Science, Where Reliance Over Defiance Must Prevail. Association Between Depressive Symptoms and Self-Reported Physical Activity in Persons With Knee Osteoarthritis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1