Akhil Dondapati MD , Thomas J. Carroll MD , Warren C. Hammert MD , Ronald Gonzalez DO , Constantinos Ketonis MD, PhD
{"title":"Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Distal Radius Fractures Following Dorsal Bridge Fixation to the Second Versus Third Metacarpal","authors":"Akhil Dondapati MD , Thomas J. Carroll MD , Warren C. Hammert MD , Ronald Gonzalez DO , Constantinos Ketonis MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.12.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Dorsal bridge plating (DBP) can effectively treat complex distal radius fractures (DRFs); however, techniques for metacarpal fixation vary. The purpose of our study was to compare range of motion (ROM), grip strength, patient-reported outcomes, radiographic parameters, and complication rates between patients undergoing DBP with fixation to the second versus third metacarpal for DRFs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div><span><span>We retrospectively analyzed 432 patients with DRFs. Wrist ROM and radiographic data were calculated at the 6-month follow-up. We calculated Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) upper-extremity, physical function, and pain interference at each visit. Additional data collected included surgical complications and demographic data. Statistical analysis was conducted via </span>multivariate analysis, </span><em>t</em> tests, and chi-square tests.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div><span>A total of 329 patients underwent DBP to the second metacarpal, whereas 103 patients underwent DBP to the third. Demographics and comorbidities were similar between the groups. Tendon rupture was more common in the third metacarpal group (3.9% vs 0.9%), with two extensor pollicis longus and one extensor indicis proprius ruptures in each group and an unspecified tendon in the third metacarpal cohort. All other complication rates were similar. The second metacarpal group demonstrated greater wrist flexion (57.8° vs 56.2°), </span>ulnar deviation (23.9° vs 20.7°), and grip strength (62.3% vs 57.8%). All other ROM measurements were similar. There was no difference in PROMIS metrics at the 6-month follow-up. The second metacarpal group demonstrated greater radial inclination (21.3° vs 19.5°) and less volar tilt (6.8° vs 7.1°).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Dorsal bridge plating to the second metacarpal demonstrated greater ROM, grip strength, and radial inclination, similar PROMIS scores, and lower extensor tendon rupture rates than third metacarpal fixation. Although there were differences between techniques, their clinical relevance is unclear. Dorsal bridge plating to the second or third metacarpal both result in acceptable outcomes and can be considered based on the fracture pattern and surgeon preference.</div></div><div><h3>Type of Study/level of evidence</h3><div>Therapeutic IV.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54815,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","volume":"50 11","pages":"Pages 1407.e1-1407.e7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363502324006427","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
Dorsal bridge plating (DBP) can effectively treat complex distal radius fractures (DRFs); however, techniques for metacarpal fixation vary. The purpose of our study was to compare range of motion (ROM), grip strength, patient-reported outcomes, radiographic parameters, and complication rates between patients undergoing DBP with fixation to the second versus third metacarpal for DRFs.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed 432 patients with DRFs. Wrist ROM and radiographic data were calculated at the 6-month follow-up. We calculated Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) upper-extremity, physical function, and pain interference at each visit. Additional data collected included surgical complications and demographic data. Statistical analysis was conducted via multivariate analysis, t tests, and chi-square tests.
Results
A total of 329 patients underwent DBP to the second metacarpal, whereas 103 patients underwent DBP to the third. Demographics and comorbidities were similar between the groups. Tendon rupture was more common in the third metacarpal group (3.9% vs 0.9%), with two extensor pollicis longus and one extensor indicis proprius ruptures in each group and an unspecified tendon in the third metacarpal cohort. All other complication rates were similar. The second metacarpal group demonstrated greater wrist flexion (57.8° vs 56.2°), ulnar deviation (23.9° vs 20.7°), and grip strength (62.3% vs 57.8%). All other ROM measurements were similar. There was no difference in PROMIS metrics at the 6-month follow-up. The second metacarpal group demonstrated greater radial inclination (21.3° vs 19.5°) and less volar tilt (6.8° vs 7.1°).
Conclusions
Dorsal bridge plating to the second metacarpal demonstrated greater ROM, grip strength, and radial inclination, similar PROMIS scores, and lower extensor tendon rupture rates than third metacarpal fixation. Although there were differences between techniques, their clinical relevance is unclear. Dorsal bridge plating to the second or third metacarpal both result in acceptable outcomes and can be considered based on the fracture pattern and surgeon preference.
目的:背桥钢板(DBP)能有效治疗桡骨远端复杂骨折(DRFs);然而,掌骨固定技术各不相同。本研究的目的是比较DRFs患者行舒张减压固定第二掌骨与第三掌骨的患者的活动范围(ROM)、握力、患者报告的结果、影像学参数和并发症发生率。方法:对432例DRFs患者进行回顾性分析。在随访6个月时计算腕关节ROM和影像学数据。我们在每次就诊时计算患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)上肢、身体功能和疼痛干扰。收集的其他数据包括手术并发症和人口统计数据。采用多变量分析、t检验、卡方检验进行统计分析。结果:329例患者接受了第二掌骨舒张压,103例患者接受了第三掌骨舒张压。两组之间的人口统计学和合并症相似。肌腱断裂在第三掌骨组更为常见(3.9% vs 0.9%),每组有2例拇长伸肌和1例食指固有伸肌断裂,第三掌骨组有1例未指明的肌腱断裂。所有其他并发症发生率相似。第二掌骨组表现出更大的腕屈曲(57.8°vs 56.2°),尺偏(23.9°vs 20.7°)和握力(62.3% vs 57.8%)。所有其他ROM测量结果相似。在6个月的随访中,PROMIS指标没有差异。第二掌骨组桡骨倾斜较大(21.3°vs 19.5°),掌侧倾斜较小(6.8°vs 7.1°)。结论:与第三掌骨固定相比,第二掌骨背桥钢板具有更大的ROM、握力和径向倾角、相似的PROMIS评分和更低的伸肌腱断裂率。虽然技术之间存在差异,但其临床意义尚不清楚。第二或第三掌骨背桥钢板均可获得可接受的结果,并可根据骨折类型和外科医生的偏好进行考虑。研究类型/证据水平:治疗性IV。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hand Surgery publishes original, peer-reviewed articles related to the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases and conditions of the upper extremity; these include both clinical and basic science studies, along with case reports. Special features include Review Articles (including Current Concepts and The Hand Surgery Landscape), Reviews of Books and Media, and Letters to the Editor.