Age and Sex Differences in Efficacy of Treatments for Type 2 Diabetes

JAMA Pub Date : 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1001/jama.2024.27402
Peter Hanlon, Elaine Butterly, Lili Wei, Heather Wightman, Saleh Ali M. Almazam, Khalid Alsallumi, Jamie Crowther, Ryan McChrystal, Heidi Rennison, Katherine Hughes, Jim Lewsey, Robert Lindsay, Stuart McGurnaghan, John Petrie, Laurie A. Tomlinson, Sarah Wild, Amanda Adler, Naveed Sattar, David M. Phillippo, Sofia Dias, Nicky J. Welton, David A. McAllister
{"title":"Age and Sex Differences in Efficacy of Treatments for Type 2 Diabetes","authors":"Peter Hanlon, Elaine Butterly, Lili Wei, Heather Wightman, Saleh Ali M. Almazam, Khalid Alsallumi, Jamie Crowther, Ryan McChrystal, Heidi Rennison, Katherine Hughes, Jim Lewsey, Robert Lindsay, Stuart McGurnaghan, John Petrie, Laurie A. Tomlinson, Sarah Wild, Amanda Adler, Naveed Sattar, David M. Phillippo, Sofia Dias, Nicky J. Welton, David A. McAllister","doi":"10.1001/jama.2024.27402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ImportanceSodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) inhibitors improve hyperglycemia, and SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists reduce the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) among individuals with type 2 diabetes. It is not clear whether efficacy varies by age or sex.ObjectiveTo assess whether age or sex are associated with differences in the efficacy of SGLT2 inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonists, and DPP4 inhibitors.Data Sources and Study SelectionThe MEDLINE and Embase databases and US and Chinese clinical trial registries were searched for articles published from inception to November 2022; in August 2024, the search was updated to capture the trial results. Two reviewers screened for randomized clinical trials of SGLT2 inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonists, or DPP4 inhibitors vs a placebo or active comparator in adults with type 2 diabetes.Data Extraction and SynthesisIndividual participant data and aggregate data were used to estimate age × treatment interactions and sex × treatment interactions in multilevel network meta-regression models.Main Outcome and MeasuresHemoglobin A<jats:sub>1c</jats:sub> (HbA<jats:sub>1c</jats:sub>) and MACEs.ResultsOf the 601 eligible trials identified (592 trials with 309 503 participants reported HbA<jats:sub>1c</jats:sub>; mean age, 58.9 [SD, 10.8] years; 42.3% were female and 23 trials with 168 489 participants reported MACEs; mean age, 64.0 [SD, 8.6] years; 35.3% were female), individual participant data were obtained for 103 trials (103 reported HbA<jats:sub>1c</jats:sub> and 6 reported MACEs). The use of SGLT2 inhibitors (vs placebo) was associated with less HbA<jats:sub>1c</jats:sub> lowering with increasing age for monotherapy (absolute reduction [AR], 0.24% [95% credible interval {CrI}, 0.10% to 0.38%] per 30-year increment in age), for dual therapy (AR, 0.17% [95% CrI, 0.10% to 0.24%]), and for triple therapy (AR, 0.25% [95% CrI, 0.20% to 0.30%]). The use of GLP-1 receptor agonists was associated with greater HbA<jats:sub>1c</jats:sub> lowering with increasing age for monotherapy (AR, −0.18% [95% CrI, −0.31% to −0.05%] per 30-year increment in age) and for dual therapy (AR, −0.24% [95% CrI, −0.40% to −0.07%]), but not for triple therapy (AR, 0.04% [95% CrI, −0.02% to 0.11%]). The use of DPP4 inhibitors was associated with slightly better HbA<jats:sub>1c</jats:sub> lowering in older people for dual therapy (AR, −0.09% [95% CrI, −0.15% to −0.03%] per 30-year increment in age), but not for monotherapy (AR, −0.08% [95% CrI, −0.18% to 0.01%]) or triple therapy (AR, −0.01% [95% CrI, −0.06% to 0.05%]). The relative reduction in MACEs with use of SGLT2 inhibitors was greater in older vs younger participants per 30-year increment in age (hazard ratio, 0.76 [95% CrI, 0.62 to 0.93]), and the relative reduction in MACEs with use of GLP-1 receptor agonists was less in older vs younger participants (hazard ratio, 1.47 [95% CrI, 1.07 to 2.02]). There was no consistent evidence for sex × treatment interactions with use of SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists.Conclusions and RelevanceThe SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists were associated with lower risk of MACEs. Analysis of age × treatment interactions suggested that SGLT2 inhibitors were more cardioprotective in older than in younger people despite smaller reductions in HbA<jats:sub>1c</jats:sub>; GLP-1 receptor agonists were more cardioprotective in younger people.","PeriodicalId":518009,"journal":{"name":"JAMA","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.27402","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ImportanceSodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) inhibitors improve hyperglycemia, and SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists reduce the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) among individuals with type 2 diabetes. It is not clear whether efficacy varies by age or sex.ObjectiveTo assess whether age or sex are associated with differences in the efficacy of SGLT2 inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonists, and DPP4 inhibitors.Data Sources and Study SelectionThe MEDLINE and Embase databases and US and Chinese clinical trial registries were searched for articles published from inception to November 2022; in August 2024, the search was updated to capture the trial results. Two reviewers screened for randomized clinical trials of SGLT2 inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonists, or DPP4 inhibitors vs a placebo or active comparator in adults with type 2 diabetes.Data Extraction and SynthesisIndividual participant data and aggregate data were used to estimate age × treatment interactions and sex × treatment interactions in multilevel network meta-regression models.Main Outcome and MeasuresHemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and MACEs.ResultsOf the 601 eligible trials identified (592 trials with 309 503 participants reported HbA1c; mean age, 58.9 [SD, 10.8] years; 42.3% were female and 23 trials with 168 489 participants reported MACEs; mean age, 64.0 [SD, 8.6] years; 35.3% were female), individual participant data were obtained for 103 trials (103 reported HbA1c and 6 reported MACEs). The use of SGLT2 inhibitors (vs placebo) was associated with less HbA1c lowering with increasing age for monotherapy (absolute reduction [AR], 0.24% [95% credible interval {CrI}, 0.10% to 0.38%] per 30-year increment in age), for dual therapy (AR, 0.17% [95% CrI, 0.10% to 0.24%]), and for triple therapy (AR, 0.25% [95% CrI, 0.20% to 0.30%]). The use of GLP-1 receptor agonists was associated with greater HbA1c lowering with increasing age for monotherapy (AR, −0.18% [95% CrI, −0.31% to −0.05%] per 30-year increment in age) and for dual therapy (AR, −0.24% [95% CrI, −0.40% to −0.07%]), but not for triple therapy (AR, 0.04% [95% CrI, −0.02% to 0.11%]). The use of DPP4 inhibitors was associated with slightly better HbA1c lowering in older people for dual therapy (AR, −0.09% [95% CrI, −0.15% to −0.03%] per 30-year increment in age), but not for monotherapy (AR, −0.08% [95% CrI, −0.18% to 0.01%]) or triple therapy (AR, −0.01% [95% CrI, −0.06% to 0.05%]). The relative reduction in MACEs with use of SGLT2 inhibitors was greater in older vs younger participants per 30-year increment in age (hazard ratio, 0.76 [95% CrI, 0.62 to 0.93]), and the relative reduction in MACEs with use of GLP-1 receptor agonists was less in older vs younger participants (hazard ratio, 1.47 [95% CrI, 1.07 to 2.02]). There was no consistent evidence for sex × treatment interactions with use of SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists.Conclusions and RelevanceThe SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists were associated with lower risk of MACEs. Analysis of age × treatment interactions suggested that SGLT2 inhibitors were more cardioprotective in older than in younger people despite smaller reductions in HbA1c; GLP-1 receptor agonists were more cardioprotective in younger people.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2型糖尿病治疗疗效的性别、年龄差异
钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白2 (SGLT2)抑制剂、胰高血糖素样肽-1 (GLP-1)受体激动剂和二肽基肽酶4 (DPP4)抑制剂可改善高血糖,SGLT2抑制剂和GLP-1受体激动剂可降低2型糖尿病患者发生主要不良心血管事件(mace)的风险。目前尚不清楚其疗效是否因年龄或性别而异。目的评估年龄或性别是否与SGLT2抑制剂、GLP-1受体激动剂和DPP4抑制剂的疗效差异有关。数据来源和研究选择检索MEDLINE和Embase数据库以及美国和中国临床试验注册库,检索从成立到2022年11月发表的文章;2024年8月,搜索更新以捕获试验结果。两名评论者筛选了SGLT2抑制剂、GLP-1受体激动剂或DPP4抑制剂与安慰剂或活性比较剂在成人2型糖尿病患者中的随机临床试验。数据提取与综合在多层次网络元回归模型中,使用个体参与者数据和汇总数据来估计年龄×治疗相互作用和性别×治疗相互作用。主要结果和测量血红蛋白A1c (HbA1c)和mace。结果在确定的601项符合条件的试验中(592项试验,309503名参与者报告了HbA1c;平均年龄58.9 [SD, 10.8]岁;42.3%为女性,23项试验共168 489名参与者报告了mace;平均年龄64.0 [SD, 8.6]岁;35.3%为女性),获得了103项试验的个体参与者数据(103项报告了HbA1c, 6项报告了mace)。SGLT2抑制剂的使用(与安慰剂相比)与HbA1c随年龄增加而降低的程度相关(绝对降低[AR],每30岁增加0.24%[95%可信区间{CrI}, 0.10%至0.38%]),双重治疗(AR, 0.17% [95% CrI, 0.10%至0.24%]),三联治疗(AR, 0.25% [95% CrI, 0.20%至0.30%])。GLP-1受体激动剂的使用与HbA1c随年龄增加而降低相关(AR,每30岁增加- 0.18% [95% CrI, - 0.31%至- 0.05%])和双重治疗(AR, - 0.24% [95% CrI, - 0.40%至- 0.07%]),但三联治疗(AR, 0.04% [95% CrI, - 0.02%至0.11%])。DPP4抑制剂的使用与双重治疗(AR,每30岁增加- 0.09% [95% CrI, - 0.15%至- 0.03%])的老年人HbA1c降低略有改善相关,但与单一治疗(AR, - 0.08% [95% CrI, - 0.18%至0.01%])或三联治疗(AR, - 0.01% [95% CrI, - 0.06%至0.05%])无关。每增加30岁,使用SGLT2抑制剂的mace相对降低在年龄较大的参与者中大于年轻参与者(风险比,0.76 [95% CrI, 0.62至0.93]),使用GLP-1受体激动剂的mace相对降低在年龄较大的参与者中小于年轻参与者(风险比,1.47 [95% CrI, 1.07至2.02])。没有一致的证据表明使用SGLT2抑制剂和GLP-1受体激动剂对性别x治疗有相互作用。结论及相关性SGLT2抑制剂和GLP-1受体激动剂与较低的mace风险相关。年龄×治疗相互作用的分析表明,SGLT2抑制剂对老年人的心脏保护作用强于年轻人,尽管HbA1c的降低幅度较小;GLP-1受体激动剂对年轻人的心脏保护作用更强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Primary Biliary Cholangitis and Prognostic Models-Reply. Toward Greater Transparency at the FDA-Now Is the Time to Act. Primary Biliary Cholangitis and Prognostic Models. Poetry and Service Learning in Medicine. Restrictive vs Liberal Physical Restraint Strategies in Critically Ill Patients: Research Summary.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1