Pediatric Readiness and Trauma Center Access for Children

IF 18 1区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS JAMA Pediatrics Pub Date : 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.6058
Caroline Melhado, Canaan Hancock, Haoyu Wang, Maya M. Eldin, Nicholas George, Jennifer A. Miller, Katherine E. Remick, Bhavin Patel, Brian K. Yorkgitis, Lisa Gray, Michael W. Dingeldein, Hilary A. Hewes, Katie W. Russell, Michael L. Nance, Aaron R. Jensen
{"title":"Pediatric Readiness and Trauma Center Access for Children","authors":"Caroline Melhado, Canaan Hancock, Haoyu Wang, Maya M. Eldin, Nicholas George, Jennifer A. Miller, Katherine E. Remick, Bhavin Patel, Brian K. Yorkgitis, Lisa Gray, Michael W. Dingeldein, Hilary A. Hewes, Katie W. Russell, Michael L. Nance, Aaron R. Jensen","doi":"10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.6058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ImportanceChildren initially treated in a timely fashion at trauma centers with high levels of pediatric readiness have been shown to have improved survival, but children historically have had geographically disparate access to pediatric trauma center care. Considerable effort has been invested in improving pediatric readiness nationally, including the implementation of new standards to improve emergency department pediatric readiness at all trauma centers.ObjectiveTo assess current access to US pediatric-ready trauma center care and to estimate potential improvement in access if all high-level trauma centers had optimal pediatric readiness.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis descriptive cross-sectional study collated trauma centers from national organizational lists, state government websites, and online searches. A geospatial analysis was performed of access by pediatric patients (aged ≤18 years) to trauma centers by ground or air ambulance within 60 minutes, stratified by trauma center type and pediatric readiness status. Population density was estimated using 2020 US census data. Weighted pediatric readiness scores (wPRS) were obtained from the 2021 National Pediatric Readiness Project assessment. The data analysis was performed between April 1 and June 30, 2023.ExposureAccess times to trauma centers.Main Outcome and MeasureThe main outcome of interest was access to a pediatric-ready trauma center, defined as a high-level pediatric trauma center (level I-II) or high-level adult trauma center (level I-III) with a wPRS of at least 93 (out of 100). Access times were calculated using previously validated methods and service network model analysis for each trauma center to census block group centroid.ResultsThe analysis included 148 pediatric and 1075 high-level adult trauma centers. A total of 273 adult centers (25%) were pediatric ready. Pediatric trauma center access within 60 minutes by ground or air ambulance was available for 65% of all 74 090 665 children; 73% of children had access to a pediatric-ready trauma center within 60 minutes, and 92% had access to any high-level trauma center within 60 minutes.ConclusionThese findings suggest that access to pediatric trauma center care is limited, even with air ambulance transport. Ensuring pediatric readiness at all high-level adult trauma centers may substantially improve access to early high-quality initial resuscitative trauma care for children.","PeriodicalId":14683,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Pediatrics","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":18.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.6058","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ImportanceChildren initially treated in a timely fashion at trauma centers with high levels of pediatric readiness have been shown to have improved survival, but children historically have had geographically disparate access to pediatric trauma center care. Considerable effort has been invested in improving pediatric readiness nationally, including the implementation of new standards to improve emergency department pediatric readiness at all trauma centers.ObjectiveTo assess current access to US pediatric-ready trauma center care and to estimate potential improvement in access if all high-level trauma centers had optimal pediatric readiness.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis descriptive cross-sectional study collated trauma centers from national organizational lists, state government websites, and online searches. A geospatial analysis was performed of access by pediatric patients (aged ≤18 years) to trauma centers by ground or air ambulance within 60 minutes, stratified by trauma center type and pediatric readiness status. Population density was estimated using 2020 US census data. Weighted pediatric readiness scores (wPRS) were obtained from the 2021 National Pediatric Readiness Project assessment. The data analysis was performed between April 1 and June 30, 2023.ExposureAccess times to trauma centers.Main Outcome and MeasureThe main outcome of interest was access to a pediatric-ready trauma center, defined as a high-level pediatric trauma center (level I-II) or high-level adult trauma center (level I-III) with a wPRS of at least 93 (out of 100). Access times were calculated using previously validated methods and service network model analysis for each trauma center to census block group centroid.ResultsThe analysis included 148 pediatric and 1075 high-level adult trauma centers. A total of 273 adult centers (25%) were pediatric ready. Pediatric trauma center access within 60 minutes by ground or air ambulance was available for 65% of all 74 090 665 children; 73% of children had access to a pediatric-ready trauma center within 60 minutes, and 92% had access to any high-level trauma center within 60 minutes.ConclusionThese findings suggest that access to pediatric trauma center care is limited, even with air ambulance transport. Ensuring pediatric readiness at all high-level adult trauma centers may substantially improve access to early high-quality initial resuscitative trauma care for children.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童准备和创伤中心访问儿童
在创伤中心及时接受治疗的儿童具有较高的儿科准备水平,这表明儿童的存活率得到了提高,但从历史上看,儿童在儿童创伤中心接受治疗的地理位置不同。在全国范围内,已经投入了相当大的努力来提高儿科的准备程度,包括实施新的标准来提高所有创伤中心急诊科的儿科准备程度。目的评估目前美国儿科创伤中心护理的可及性,并估计如果所有高水平创伤中心都有最佳的儿科准备,可获得性的潜在改善。设计、设置和参与者本描述性横断面研究从国家组织列表、州政府网站和在线搜索中整理创伤中心。对60分钟内乘坐地面或空中救护车到达创伤中心的儿科患者(年龄≤18岁)进行地理空间分析,并按创伤中心类型和儿童准备状态分层。人口密度是根据2020年美国人口普查数据估计的。加权儿科准备得分(wPRS)从2021年国家儿科准备项目评估中获得。数据分析时间为2023年4月1日至6月30日。去创伤中心的次数。主要结局和测量感兴趣的主要结局是进入儿科创伤中心,定义为高水平儿童创伤中心(1 - ii级)或高水平成人创伤中心(1 - iii级),wPRS至少为93(满分100分)。使用先前验证的方法和服务网络模型分析计算每个创伤中心到人口普查街区群质心的访问时间。结果纳入148家儿科创伤中心和1075家高水平成人创伤中心。共有273个成人中心(25%)为儿科做好了准备。在所有74 090 665名儿童中,65%的儿童可以在60分钟内通过地面或空中救护车到达儿科创伤中心;73%的儿童可以在60分钟内进入儿科创伤中心,92%的儿童可以在60分钟内进入任何高级创伤中心。结论这些发现表明,即使有空中救护运输,儿童创伤中心的护理机会也是有限的。确保儿科在所有高水平成人创伤中心做好准备,可以大大提高儿童获得早期高质量初始创伤复苏护理的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA Pediatrics
JAMA Pediatrics PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
31.60
自引率
1.90%
发文量
357
期刊介绍: JAMA Pediatrics, the oldest continuously published pediatric journal in the US since 1911, is an international peer-reviewed publication and a part of the JAMA Network. Published weekly online and in 12 issues annually, it garners over 8.4 million article views and downloads yearly. All research articles become freely accessible online after 12 months without any author fees, and through the WHO's HINARI program, the online version is accessible to institutions in developing countries. With a focus on advancing the health of infants, children, and adolescents, JAMA Pediatrics serves as a platform for discussing crucial issues and policies in child and adolescent health care. Leveraging the latest technology, it ensures timely access to information for its readers worldwide.
期刊最新文献
"Conversion Therapy" in the US-Progress, Missed Opportunities, and Future Directions. Cognitive and Educational Outcomes After Preterm Birth or Low Birth Weight: An Umbrella Review and Meta-Analysis. Parent-Reported Chronic Pain in Children With and Without Developmental Disabilities. What Parents Need to Know About Moles in Children Long-Term Cardiometabolic Outcomes in Children With Metabolically Healthy and Unhealthy Obesity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1