Reduced avoidance behaviour in Daphnia magna due to agrochemical-induced vulnerability

IF 6.2 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2025.117673
María Eugenia López-Valcárcel , Ana del Arco , Cristiano V.M. Araújo , Gema Parra
{"title":"Reduced avoidance behaviour in Daphnia magna due to agrochemical-induced vulnerability","authors":"María Eugenia López-Valcárcel ,&nbsp;Ana del Arco ,&nbsp;Cristiano V.M. Araújo ,&nbsp;Gema Parra","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoenv.2025.117673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The continuous discharge of agrochemicals used in intensive agriculture contaminates aquatic systems, harming aquatic biota and their processes. Although mobile organisms can avoid continuous exposure by moving to less-affected habitats, their capacity can be altered by pollutant exposure. Populations with a previous disturbance history, which show a lower ability to respond to subsequent stressors, are defined as vulnerable. Therefore, this study investigated the so far unknown escape capacity of a vulnerable zooplankton population previously exposed to a contaminated environment. To this end, agrochemically driven vulnerability was induced in populations of <em>Daphnia magna</em> by exposure to sublethal concentrations of glyphosate. Vulnerability was verified using a starvation test in which significant differences were observed between the control populations and populations with a disturbance history. Both the Control and Vulnerable populations were assessed for their avoidance capacity by exposing them to a glyphosate gradient using a Heterogeneous Multiple-Habitat Assay System (HeMHAS). The control populations showed a rapid reaction from the beginning of the assay, with avoidance rates increasing over 24 h, while vulnerable populations were unable to avoid contaminated habitats for up to 24 h. Therefore, we concluded that vulnerable populations have a lower capacity to avoid contaminated habitats. In heterogeneously contaminated habitats, a lower avoidance capacity is responsible for the differential spatial distribution of the affected species, which impacts the ecosystem structure. Additionally, agrochemically induced vulnerability and its effect on avoidance behaviour may affect ecosystem functioning through the altered spatial distribution of zooplankton populations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":303,"journal":{"name":"Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety","volume":"291 ","pages":"Article 117673"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147651325000090","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The continuous discharge of agrochemicals used in intensive agriculture contaminates aquatic systems, harming aquatic biota and their processes. Although mobile organisms can avoid continuous exposure by moving to less-affected habitats, their capacity can be altered by pollutant exposure. Populations with a previous disturbance history, which show a lower ability to respond to subsequent stressors, are defined as vulnerable. Therefore, this study investigated the so far unknown escape capacity of a vulnerable zooplankton population previously exposed to a contaminated environment. To this end, agrochemically driven vulnerability was induced in populations of Daphnia magna by exposure to sublethal concentrations of glyphosate. Vulnerability was verified using a starvation test in which significant differences were observed between the control populations and populations with a disturbance history. Both the Control and Vulnerable populations were assessed for their avoidance capacity by exposing them to a glyphosate gradient using a Heterogeneous Multiple-Habitat Assay System (HeMHAS). The control populations showed a rapid reaction from the beginning of the assay, with avoidance rates increasing over 24 h, while vulnerable populations were unable to avoid contaminated habitats for up to 24 h. Therefore, we concluded that vulnerable populations have a lower capacity to avoid contaminated habitats. In heterogeneously contaminated habitats, a lower avoidance capacity is responsible for the differential spatial distribution of the affected species, which impacts the ecosystem structure. Additionally, agrochemically induced vulnerability and its effect on avoidance behaviour may affect ecosystem functioning through the altered spatial distribution of zooplankton populations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
1234
审稿时长
88 days
期刊介绍: Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety is a multi-disciplinary journal that focuses on understanding the exposure and effects of environmental contamination on organisms including human health. The scope of the journal covers three main themes. The topics within these themes, indicated below, include (but are not limited to) the following: Ecotoxicology、Environmental Chemistry、Environmental Safety etc.
期刊最新文献
Comment on “Neurotrophin-3 as a mediator in the link between PM2.5 exposure and psychiatric disorders: A Mendelian randomization study” Long-term low-level ozone exposure and the incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus and glycemic levels: A prospective cohort study from Southwest China Thiram-induced ER stress promotes mitochondrial calcium signaling and NLRP3 inflammasome activation in a tissue specific manner Transcriptomic and metabolic profiling reveals the effects of long-term microwave exposure on testicular tissue Integration analysis of miRNA-mRNA uncovers the mechanisms of ochratoxin A-induced hepatotoxicity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1