Deployment and uptake of COVID-19 vaccines for refugees and migrants in regular and irregular situations: a mixed-method multicountry study.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMJ Open Pub Date : 2025-02-02 DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087629
Pierina Benavente, Vinay N Kampalath, Moussa Lonkila Zan, Nguyen Toan Tran, Elżbieta Anna Czapka, Seyed-Moeen Hosseinalipour, Enrique Teran, Cheryl Martens, Biraj Man Karmacharya, Anjali Joshi, Jai K Das, Zahra A Padhani, Vicente B Jurlano, Maria Midea M Kabamalan, Laetitia Nyirazinyoye, Karl Blanchet
{"title":"Deployment and uptake of COVID-19 vaccines for refugees and migrants in regular and irregular situations: a mixed-method multicountry study.","authors":"Pierina Benavente, Vinay N Kampalath, Moussa Lonkila Zan, Nguyen Toan Tran, Elżbieta Anna Czapka, Seyed-Moeen Hosseinalipour, Enrique Teran, Cheryl Martens, Biraj Man Karmacharya, Anjali Joshi, Jai K Das, Zahra A Padhani, Vicente B Jurlano, Maria Midea M Kabamalan, Laetitia Nyirazinyoye, Karl Blanchet","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic has widened inequities, affecting migrant and refugee populations in vulnerable situations, who may face elevated risks of infection, constrained healthcare access and discrimination. Inclusive vaccination campaigns are recommended, but barriers persist. This study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators and estimate vaccination coverage among refugees and migrants in low- and middle-income countries, emphasising inclusive policies for effective rollout.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-method study was conducted in two phases in Ecuador, Nepal, Pakistan, the Philippines and Rwanda. Phase 1 (March-May 2022) included policy analysis, in-depth interviews and focus-group discussions with 52 key informants analysed with thematic and grounded theory approaches using hybrid coding. Phase 2 (June-August 2022) included a cross-sectional study among refugees and migrants in regular (MIRS) and irregular situations (MIIS) and used descriptive analysis and a COVID-19 Vaccine Equity Index (CVEI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1378 individuals responded to the survey (43.8% MIRS, 31.2% MIIS and 25% refugees). 87% reported receiving at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. The CVEI at the global level (0.824) suggested differences in complete vaccination between migrants and other residents in most of the study countries (refugees reported more access to vaccines than MIRS and MIIS). However, the qualitative phase reported delays and inequities in the early stage of the vaccination process in all countries. Overall, 64.2% of respondents perceived that government' campaigns were successful. Both the qualitative and quantitative phases identified several barriers and facilitators. The main barriers included a lack of trust in authorities, extended waiting times and distance to vaccination centres, discrimination and xenophobia, lack of identity documentation, and adverse reaction concerns. On the other hand, the primary facilitators were the widespread distribution of vaccination centres, sources and provision of information, specific campaigns for refugees and migrants, free vaccination and the motivation to protect others' health.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the high coverage of COVID-19 vaccines among refugees and migrants in the study countries, the process had significant barriers. Simple vaccination registration procedures, targeted campaigns, mobile vaccination teams for hard-to-reach and vulnerable groups, and building trust in the host country authorities are pivotal for future and inclusive vaccine deployments.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"15 1","pages":"e087629"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087629","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has widened inequities, affecting migrant and refugee populations in vulnerable situations, who may face elevated risks of infection, constrained healthcare access and discrimination. Inclusive vaccination campaigns are recommended, but barriers persist. This study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators and estimate vaccination coverage among refugees and migrants in low- and middle-income countries, emphasising inclusive policies for effective rollout.

Methods: A mixed-method study was conducted in two phases in Ecuador, Nepal, Pakistan, the Philippines and Rwanda. Phase 1 (March-May 2022) included policy analysis, in-depth interviews and focus-group discussions with 52 key informants analysed with thematic and grounded theory approaches using hybrid coding. Phase 2 (June-August 2022) included a cross-sectional study among refugees and migrants in regular (MIRS) and irregular situations (MIIS) and used descriptive analysis and a COVID-19 Vaccine Equity Index (CVEI).

Results: A total of 1378 individuals responded to the survey (43.8% MIRS, 31.2% MIIS and 25% refugees). 87% reported receiving at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. The CVEI at the global level (0.824) suggested differences in complete vaccination between migrants and other residents in most of the study countries (refugees reported more access to vaccines than MIRS and MIIS). However, the qualitative phase reported delays and inequities in the early stage of the vaccination process in all countries. Overall, 64.2% of respondents perceived that government' campaigns were successful. Both the qualitative and quantitative phases identified several barriers and facilitators. The main barriers included a lack of trust in authorities, extended waiting times and distance to vaccination centres, discrimination and xenophobia, lack of identity documentation, and adverse reaction concerns. On the other hand, the primary facilitators were the widespread distribution of vaccination centres, sources and provision of information, specific campaigns for refugees and migrants, free vaccination and the motivation to protect others' health.

Conclusions: Despite the high coverage of COVID-19 vaccines among refugees and migrants in the study countries, the process had significant barriers. Simple vaccination registration procedures, targeted campaigns, mobile vaccination teams for hard-to-reach and vulnerable groups, and building trust in the host country authorities are pivotal for future and inclusive vaccine deployments.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open
BMJ Open MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
4510
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
期刊最新文献
Ambient air pollution and birth outcomes: a scoping review to investigate the mediating and moderating variables-protocol. Assessment of patient preferences for assisted reproductive technology in China: a discrete choice experiment. Association between poor oral health and deterioration of appetite in older age: results from longitudinal analyses of two prospective cohorts from the UK and USA. Developing a core outcome set for assessing interventions and care for parents after neonatal death in high-income countries (iCHOOSE Neonatal study): protocol for a mixed-methods study. Associations between caregivers' health behaviours and overweight/obesity among children aged 2-6 years in Beijing, China: a cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1