Deployment and uptake of COVID-19 vaccines for refugees and migrants in regular and irregular situations: a mixed-method multicountry study.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMJ Open Pub Date : 2025-02-02 DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087629
Pierina Benavente, Vinay N Kampalath, Moussa Lonkila Zan, Nguyen Toan Tran, Elżbieta Anna Czapka, Seyed-Moeen Hosseinalipour, Enrique Teran, Cheryl Martens, Biraj Man Karmacharya, Anjali Joshi, Jai K Das, Zahra A Padhani, Vicente B Jurlano, Maria Midea M Kabamalan, Laetitia Nyirazinyoye, Karl Blanchet
{"title":"Deployment and uptake of COVID-19 vaccines for refugees and migrants in regular and irregular situations: a mixed-method multicountry study.","authors":"Pierina Benavente, Vinay N Kampalath, Moussa Lonkila Zan, Nguyen Toan Tran, Elżbieta Anna Czapka, Seyed-Moeen Hosseinalipour, Enrique Teran, Cheryl Martens, Biraj Man Karmacharya, Anjali Joshi, Jai K Das, Zahra A Padhani, Vicente B Jurlano, Maria Midea M Kabamalan, Laetitia Nyirazinyoye, Karl Blanchet","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic has widened inequities, affecting migrant and refugee populations in vulnerable situations, who may face elevated risks of infection, constrained healthcare access and discrimination. Inclusive vaccination campaigns are recommended, but barriers persist. This study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators and estimate vaccination coverage among refugees and migrants in low- and middle-income countries, emphasising inclusive policies for effective rollout.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-method study was conducted in two phases in Ecuador, Nepal, Pakistan, the Philippines and Rwanda. Phase 1 (March-May 2022) included policy analysis, in-depth interviews and focus-group discussions with 52 key informants analysed with thematic and grounded theory approaches using hybrid coding. Phase 2 (June-August 2022) included a cross-sectional study among refugees and migrants in regular (MIRS) and irregular situations (MIIS) and used descriptive analysis and a COVID-19 Vaccine Equity Index (CVEI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1378 individuals responded to the survey (43.8% MIRS, 31.2% MIIS and 25% refugees). 87% reported receiving at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. The CVEI at the global level (0.824) suggested differences in complete vaccination between migrants and other residents in most of the study countries (refugees reported more access to vaccines than MIRS and MIIS). However, the qualitative phase reported delays and inequities in the early stage of the vaccination process in all countries. Overall, 64.2% of respondents perceived that government' campaigns were successful. Both the qualitative and quantitative phases identified several barriers and facilitators. The main barriers included a lack of trust in authorities, extended waiting times and distance to vaccination centres, discrimination and xenophobia, lack of identity documentation, and adverse reaction concerns. On the other hand, the primary facilitators were the widespread distribution of vaccination centres, sources and provision of information, specific campaigns for refugees and migrants, free vaccination and the motivation to protect others' health.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the high coverage of COVID-19 vaccines among refugees and migrants in the study countries, the process had significant barriers. Simple vaccination registration procedures, targeted campaigns, mobile vaccination teams for hard-to-reach and vulnerable groups, and building trust in the host country authorities are pivotal for future and inclusive vaccine deployments.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"15 1","pages":"e087629"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11904359/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087629","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has widened inequities, affecting migrant and refugee populations in vulnerable situations, who may face elevated risks of infection, constrained healthcare access and discrimination. Inclusive vaccination campaigns are recommended, but barriers persist. This study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators and estimate vaccination coverage among refugees and migrants in low- and middle-income countries, emphasising inclusive policies for effective rollout.

Methods: A mixed-method study was conducted in two phases in Ecuador, Nepal, Pakistan, the Philippines and Rwanda. Phase 1 (March-May 2022) included policy analysis, in-depth interviews and focus-group discussions with 52 key informants analysed with thematic and grounded theory approaches using hybrid coding. Phase 2 (June-August 2022) included a cross-sectional study among refugees and migrants in regular (MIRS) and irregular situations (MIIS) and used descriptive analysis and a COVID-19 Vaccine Equity Index (CVEI).

Results: A total of 1378 individuals responded to the survey (43.8% MIRS, 31.2% MIIS and 25% refugees). 87% reported receiving at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. The CVEI at the global level (0.824) suggested differences in complete vaccination between migrants and other residents in most of the study countries (refugees reported more access to vaccines than MIRS and MIIS). However, the qualitative phase reported delays and inequities in the early stage of the vaccination process in all countries. Overall, 64.2% of respondents perceived that government' campaigns were successful. Both the qualitative and quantitative phases identified several barriers and facilitators. The main barriers included a lack of trust in authorities, extended waiting times and distance to vaccination centres, discrimination and xenophobia, lack of identity documentation, and adverse reaction concerns. On the other hand, the primary facilitators were the widespread distribution of vaccination centres, sources and provision of information, specific campaigns for refugees and migrants, free vaccination and the motivation to protect others' health.

Conclusions: Despite the high coverage of COVID-19 vaccines among refugees and migrants in the study countries, the process had significant barriers. Simple vaccination registration procedures, targeted campaigns, mobile vaccination teams for hard-to-reach and vulnerable groups, and building trust in the host country authorities are pivotal for future and inclusive vaccine deployments.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为正常和不正常情况下的难民和移民部署和使用COVID-19疫苗:一项混合方法多国研究
背景:2019冠状病毒病大流行扩大了不平等现象,影响到处境脆弱的移民和难民人口,他们可能面临更高的感染风险、获得医疗服务的机会受限和歧视。建议开展包容性疫苗接种运动,但障碍依然存在。这项研究旨在确定障碍和促进因素,并估计低收入和中等收入国家难民和移民的疫苗接种覆盖率,强调有效推广的包容性政策。方法:采用混合方法,分两期在厄瓜多尔、尼泊尔、巴基斯坦、菲律宾和卢旺达进行研究。第一阶段(2022年3月至5月)包括政策分析、深度访谈和与52名关键线人的焦点小组讨论,采用混合编码的主题和扎根理论方法进行分析。第二阶段(2022年6月至8月)包括对正常(MIRS)和非正常情况(MIIS)的难民和移民进行横断面研究,并使用描述性分析和COVID-19疫苗公平指数(CVEI)。结果:共有1378人参与了调查,其中MIRS占43.8%,MIIS占31.2%,难民占25%。87%的人报告至少接种了一剂COVID-19疫苗。全球水平的CVEI(0.824)表明,在大多数研究国家中,移民和其他居民在完全接种疫苗方面存在差异(难民报告的疫苗获得率高于MIRS和MIIS)。然而,质量阶段报告了所有国家在疫苗接种过程早期阶段的延误和不公平现象。总体而言,64.2%的受访者认为政府的宣传活动是成功的。定性和定量阶段都确定了若干障碍和促进因素。主要障碍包括对当局缺乏信任、等待时间延长和到疫苗接种中心的距离延长、歧视和仇外心理、缺乏身份证件以及对不良反应的担忧。另一方面,主要的促进因素是疫苗接种中心的广泛分布、信息的来源和提供、针对难民和移民的具体运动、免费疫苗接种以及保护他人健康的动机。结论:尽管在研究国家的难民和移民中COVID-19疫苗的覆盖率很高,但这一过程存在重大障碍。简单的疫苗接种登记程序、有针对性的运动、针对难以接触到的弱势群体的流动疫苗接种小组,以及建立对东道国当局的信任,对于未来和包容性的疫苗部署至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open
BMJ Open MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
4510
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of an education intervention to support genomics research participation: a community-based pre-post study among participants under-represented in diabetes genomics research. Utilization of palliative care services among adult patients with cancer at Jimma University Medical Center, Jimma, southwestern Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. Evolution and forecasting of antiretroviral therapy utilisation in British Columbia: a population-level analysis of provincial drug treatment programme data, 2014-2024. Factors associated with high-cost patients with first-episode psychosis: a retrospective study of direct healthcare costs using US private-payer claims data. Prevalence and potential risk factors of short birth interval among reproductive-aged women in Bangladesh: a population-based cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1