{"title":"Convergent validity of cortical auditory evoked potential indices of central auditory nervous system inhibition in people with and without tinnitus","authors":"Kenneth Morse, Leah Morse","doi":"10.1016/j.heares.2025.109185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Tinnitus is the perception of a ringing, buzzing, or other sound without the presence of an external stimulus. Reduced central auditory nervous system inhibition is a commonly reported mechanism contributing to a person's tinnitus perception. Different cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) studies have supported the presence of reduced inhibition in people with tinnitus. Although previous CAEPs used to study tinnitus do broadly represent inhibitory function, it is not entirely clear if the different CAEPs present similarly within an individual. To address this gap in knowledge, the current study evaluated the convergent validity between different CAEPs that broadly reflect inhibitory function, called sensory gating and onset-offset CAEPs. Convergent validity between sensory gating and onset-offset CAEPs was evaluated as a function of participant tinnitus status, stimulus frequency, and CAEP quantification approach. The results indicated that sensory gating and onset-offset CAEP responses indicative of inhibitory function did not demonstrate strong convergent validity. Further, the strength of convergent validity did not differ between people with and without tinnitus. However, experimental factors that yielded more robust CAEPs, such as broadband stimuli, and more comprehensive measures of amplitude, such as total response area, resulted in better convergent validity compared to higher frequency stimuli and more isolated measures of amplitude like peak amplitude. Overall, these findings suggest that the specific inhibitory mechanisms represented by sensory gating and onset-offset CAEPs differ. Therefore, each CAEP may be better suited to study distinct populations and/or inhibitory functions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12881,"journal":{"name":"Hearing Research","volume":"458 ","pages":"Article 109185"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hearing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378595525000048","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Tinnitus is the perception of a ringing, buzzing, or other sound without the presence of an external stimulus. Reduced central auditory nervous system inhibition is a commonly reported mechanism contributing to a person's tinnitus perception. Different cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) studies have supported the presence of reduced inhibition in people with tinnitus. Although previous CAEPs used to study tinnitus do broadly represent inhibitory function, it is not entirely clear if the different CAEPs present similarly within an individual. To address this gap in knowledge, the current study evaluated the convergent validity between different CAEPs that broadly reflect inhibitory function, called sensory gating and onset-offset CAEPs. Convergent validity between sensory gating and onset-offset CAEPs was evaluated as a function of participant tinnitus status, stimulus frequency, and CAEP quantification approach. The results indicated that sensory gating and onset-offset CAEP responses indicative of inhibitory function did not demonstrate strong convergent validity. Further, the strength of convergent validity did not differ between people with and without tinnitus. However, experimental factors that yielded more robust CAEPs, such as broadband stimuli, and more comprehensive measures of amplitude, such as total response area, resulted in better convergent validity compared to higher frequency stimuli and more isolated measures of amplitude like peak amplitude. Overall, these findings suggest that the specific inhibitory mechanisms represented by sensory gating and onset-offset CAEPs differ. Therefore, each CAEP may be better suited to study distinct populations and/or inhibitory functions.
期刊介绍:
The aim of the journal is to provide a forum for papers concerned with basic peripheral and central auditory mechanisms. Emphasis is on experimental and clinical studies, but theoretical and methodological papers will also be considered. The journal publishes original research papers, review and mini- review articles, rapid communications, method/protocol and perspective articles.
Papers submitted should deal with auditory anatomy, physiology, psychophysics, imaging, modeling and behavioural studies in animals and humans, as well as hearing aids and cochlear implants. Papers dealing with the vestibular system are also considered for publication. Papers on comparative aspects of hearing and on effects of drugs and environmental contaminants on hearing function will also be considered. Clinical papers will be accepted when they contribute to the understanding of normal and pathological hearing functions.