Convergent validity of cortical auditory evoked potential indices of central auditory nervous system inhibition in people with and without tinnitus

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Hearing Research Pub Date : 2025-01-08 DOI:10.1016/j.heares.2025.109185
Kenneth Morse, Leah Morse
{"title":"Convergent validity of cortical auditory evoked potential indices of central auditory nervous system inhibition in people with and without tinnitus","authors":"Kenneth Morse,&nbsp;Leah Morse","doi":"10.1016/j.heares.2025.109185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Tinnitus is the perception of a ringing, buzzing, or other sound without the presence of an external stimulus. Reduced central auditory nervous system inhibition is a commonly reported mechanism contributing to a person's tinnitus perception. Different cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) studies have supported the presence of reduced inhibition in people with tinnitus. Although previous CAEPs used to study tinnitus do broadly represent inhibitory function, it is not entirely clear if the different CAEPs present similarly within an individual. To address this gap in knowledge, the current study evaluated the convergent validity between different CAEPs that broadly reflect inhibitory function, called sensory gating and onset-offset CAEPs. Convergent validity between sensory gating and onset-offset CAEPs was evaluated as a function of participant tinnitus status, stimulus frequency, and CAEP quantification approach. The results indicated that sensory gating and onset-offset CAEP responses indicative of inhibitory function did not demonstrate strong convergent validity. Further, the strength of convergent validity did not differ between people with and without tinnitus. However, experimental factors that yielded more robust CAEPs, such as broadband stimuli, and more comprehensive measures of amplitude, such as total response area, resulted in better convergent validity compared to higher frequency stimuli and more isolated measures of amplitude like peak amplitude. Overall, these findings suggest that the specific inhibitory mechanisms represented by sensory gating and onset-offset CAEPs differ. Therefore, each CAEP may be better suited to study distinct populations and/or inhibitory functions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12881,"journal":{"name":"Hearing Research","volume":"458 ","pages":"Article 109185"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hearing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378595525000048","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tinnitus is the perception of a ringing, buzzing, or other sound without the presence of an external stimulus. Reduced central auditory nervous system inhibition is a commonly reported mechanism contributing to a person's tinnitus perception. Different cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) studies have supported the presence of reduced inhibition in people with tinnitus. Although previous CAEPs used to study tinnitus do broadly represent inhibitory function, it is not entirely clear if the different CAEPs present similarly within an individual. To address this gap in knowledge, the current study evaluated the convergent validity between different CAEPs that broadly reflect inhibitory function, called sensory gating and onset-offset CAEPs. Convergent validity between sensory gating and onset-offset CAEPs was evaluated as a function of participant tinnitus status, stimulus frequency, and CAEP quantification approach. The results indicated that sensory gating and onset-offset CAEP responses indicative of inhibitory function did not demonstrate strong convergent validity. Further, the strength of convergent validity did not differ between people with and without tinnitus. However, experimental factors that yielded more robust CAEPs, such as broadband stimuli, and more comprehensive measures of amplitude, such as total response area, resulted in better convergent validity compared to higher frequency stimuli and more isolated measures of amplitude like peak amplitude. Overall, these findings suggest that the specific inhibitory mechanisms represented by sensory gating and onset-offset CAEPs differ. Therefore, each CAEP may be better suited to study distinct populations and/or inhibitory functions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hearing Research
Hearing Research 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
163
审稿时长
75 days
期刊介绍: The aim of the journal is to provide a forum for papers concerned with basic peripheral and central auditory mechanisms. Emphasis is on experimental and clinical studies, but theoretical and methodological papers will also be considered. The journal publishes original research papers, review and mini- review articles, rapid communications, method/protocol and perspective articles. Papers submitted should deal with auditory anatomy, physiology, psychophysics, imaging, modeling and behavioural studies in animals and humans, as well as hearing aids and cochlear implants. Papers dealing with the vestibular system are also considered for publication. Papers on comparative aspects of hearing and on effects of drugs and environmental contaminants on hearing function will also be considered. Clinical papers will be accepted when they contribute to the understanding of normal and pathological hearing functions.
期刊最新文献
Tinnitus, masked speech perception, and auditory event-related potentials in clinically normal-hearing adults Sex differences in auditory function of the desert locust Editorial Board Ankyrins are dispensable for mechanotransduction by cochlear hair cells NF2-related schwannomatosis: A view from within the inner ear
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1