Tinnitus, masked speech perception, and auditory event-related potentials in clinically normal-hearing adults

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Hearing Research Pub Date : 2025-03-07 DOI:10.1016/j.heares.2025.109239
Ning Gao , Sheng-Yu Tao , Qian-Jie Fu , John Galvin , Sean Lang , Ya-Feng Yu , Ji-Sheng Liu , Duo-Duo Tao
{"title":"Tinnitus, masked speech perception, and auditory event-related potentials in clinically normal-hearing adults","authors":"Ning Gao ,&nbsp;Sheng-Yu Tao ,&nbsp;Qian-Jie Fu ,&nbsp;John Galvin ,&nbsp;Sean Lang ,&nbsp;Ya-Feng Yu ,&nbsp;Ji-Sheng Liu ,&nbsp;Duo-Duo Tao","doi":"10.1016/j.heares.2025.109239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Tinnitus can increase stress and anxiety and reduce quality of life. Compared to listeners with normal hearing and no tinnitus, listeners with tinnitus (with or without hearing loss) often have greater difficulty segregating competing speech. Previous studies have investigated neural correlates of tinnitus using the P3 component of event-related potentials (ERPs). Speech reception thresholds (SRTs) and ERPs were measured in 29 listeners with tinnitus and 25 listeners without tinnitus; all were clinically normal hearing, with pure-tone average (PTA) thresholds &lt;25 dB HL across 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz. SRTs for a male target talker were measured in speech-shaped noise (SSN; energetic masking) or with a single female speech masker (informational masking). Auditory ERPs were measured for a 1 kHz vs. 2 kHz contrast. SRTs in competing speech were significantly lower for the non-tinnitus than for the tinnitus group (<em>p</em> = 0.042); there was no significant group difference for SRTs in SSN. Latency was significantly longer for the tinnitus than for the non-tinnitus group for N1 (<em>p</em> = 0.034) and P3 (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), but not for P2. There were no significant group differences in terms of P2-N1 or P3 amplitude. Multilinear regression analysis showed that age at testing (<em>p</em> = 0.005), N1 latency (<em>p</em> = 0.031), P3 latency (<em>p</em> = 0.020), and P3 amplitude (<em>p</em> = 0.031) were significant predictors of SRTs in competing speech. The present results suggest that among adults with clinically normal PTAs, susceptibility to informational masking may be greater for listeners with than without tinnitus.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12881,"journal":{"name":"Hearing Research","volume":"460 ","pages":"Article 109239"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hearing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378595525000589","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tinnitus can increase stress and anxiety and reduce quality of life. Compared to listeners with normal hearing and no tinnitus, listeners with tinnitus (with or without hearing loss) often have greater difficulty segregating competing speech. Previous studies have investigated neural correlates of tinnitus using the P3 component of event-related potentials (ERPs). Speech reception thresholds (SRTs) and ERPs were measured in 29 listeners with tinnitus and 25 listeners without tinnitus; all were clinically normal hearing, with pure-tone average (PTA) thresholds <25 dB HL across 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz. SRTs for a male target talker were measured in speech-shaped noise (SSN; energetic masking) or with a single female speech masker (informational masking). Auditory ERPs were measured for a 1 kHz vs. 2 kHz contrast. SRTs in competing speech were significantly lower for the non-tinnitus than for the tinnitus group (p = 0.042); there was no significant group difference for SRTs in SSN. Latency was significantly longer for the tinnitus than for the non-tinnitus group for N1 (p = 0.034) and P3 (p < 0.001), but not for P2. There were no significant group differences in terms of P2-N1 or P3 amplitude. Multilinear regression analysis showed that age at testing (p = 0.005), N1 latency (p = 0.031), P3 latency (p = 0.020), and P3 amplitude (p = 0.031) were significant predictors of SRTs in competing speech. The present results suggest that among adults with clinically normal PTAs, susceptibility to informational masking may be greater for listeners with than without tinnitus.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hearing Research
Hearing Research 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
163
审稿时长
75 days
期刊介绍: The aim of the journal is to provide a forum for papers concerned with basic peripheral and central auditory mechanisms. Emphasis is on experimental and clinical studies, but theoretical and methodological papers will also be considered. The journal publishes original research papers, review and mini- review articles, rapid communications, method/protocol and perspective articles. Papers submitted should deal with auditory anatomy, physiology, psychophysics, imaging, modeling and behavioural studies in animals and humans, as well as hearing aids and cochlear implants. Papers dealing with the vestibular system are also considered for publication. Papers on comparative aspects of hearing and on effects of drugs and environmental contaminants on hearing function will also be considered. Clinical papers will be accepted when they contribute to the understanding of normal and pathological hearing functions.
期刊最新文献
Tinnitus, masked speech perception, and auditory event-related potentials in clinically normal-hearing adults Sex differences in auditory function of the desert locust Editorial Board Ankyrins are dispensable for mechanotransduction by cochlear hair cells NF2-related schwannomatosis: A view from within the inner ear
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1