Accuracy, satisfaction, and impact of custom GPT in acquiring clinical knowledge: Potential for AI-assisted medical education.

IF 3.3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Medical Teacher Pub Date : 2025-02-02 DOI:10.1080/0142159X.2025.2458808
Jiaxi Pu, Jie Hong, Qiao Yu, Pan Yu, Jiaqi Tian, Yuehua He, Hanwei Huang, Qiongjing Yuan, Lijian Tao, Zhangzhe Peng
{"title":"Accuracy, satisfaction, and impact of custom GPT in acquiring clinical knowledge: Potential for AI-assisted medical education.","authors":"Jiaxi Pu, Jie Hong, Qiao Yu, Pan Yu, Jiaqi Tian, Yuehua He, Hanwei Huang, Qiongjing Yuan, Lijian Tao, Zhangzhe Peng","doi":"10.1080/0142159X.2025.2458808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have enabled the customization of large language models to address specific domains such as medical education. This study investigates the practical performance of a custom GPT model in enhancing clinical knowledge acquisition for medical students and physicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A custom GPT was developed by incorporating the latest readily available teaching resources. Its accuracy in providing clinical knowledge was evaluated using a set of clinical questions, and responses were compared against established medical guidelines. Satisfaction was assessed through surveys involving medical students and physicians at different stages and from various types of hospitals. The impact of the custom GPT was further evaluated by comparing its role in facilitating clinical knowledge acquisition with traditional learning methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The custom GPT demonstrated higher accuracy (83.6%) compared to general AI models (65.5%, 69.1%) and was comparable to a professionally developed AI (Glass Health, 83.6%). Residents reported the highest satisfaction compared to clerks and physicians, citing improved learning independence, motivation, and confidence (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Physicians, especially those from teaching hospitals, showed greater eagerness to develop a custom GPT compared to clerks and residents (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The impact analysis revealed that residents using the custom GPT achieved better test scores compared to those using traditional resources (<i>p</i> < 0.05), though fewer perfect scores were obtained.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The custom GPT demonstrates significant promise as an innovative tool for advancing medical education, particularly for residents. Its capability to deliver accurate, tailored information complements traditional teaching methods, aiding educators in promoting personalized and consistent training. However, it is essential for both learners and educators to remain critical in evaluating AI-generated information. With continued development and thoughtful integration, AI tools like custom GPTs have the potential to significantly enhance the quality and accessibility of medical education.[Box: see text].</p>","PeriodicalId":18643,"journal":{"name":"Medical Teacher","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2025.2458808","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have enabled the customization of large language models to address specific domains such as medical education. This study investigates the practical performance of a custom GPT model in enhancing clinical knowledge acquisition for medical students and physicians.

Methods: A custom GPT was developed by incorporating the latest readily available teaching resources. Its accuracy in providing clinical knowledge was evaluated using a set of clinical questions, and responses were compared against established medical guidelines. Satisfaction was assessed through surveys involving medical students and physicians at different stages and from various types of hospitals. The impact of the custom GPT was further evaluated by comparing its role in facilitating clinical knowledge acquisition with traditional learning methods.

Results: The custom GPT demonstrated higher accuracy (83.6%) compared to general AI models (65.5%, 69.1%) and was comparable to a professionally developed AI (Glass Health, 83.6%). Residents reported the highest satisfaction compared to clerks and physicians, citing improved learning independence, motivation, and confidence (p < 0.05). Physicians, especially those from teaching hospitals, showed greater eagerness to develop a custom GPT compared to clerks and residents (p < 0.05). The impact analysis revealed that residents using the custom GPT achieved better test scores compared to those using traditional resources (p < 0.05), though fewer perfect scores were obtained.

Conclusions: The custom GPT demonstrates significant promise as an innovative tool for advancing medical education, particularly for residents. Its capability to deliver accurate, tailored information complements traditional teaching methods, aiding educators in promoting personalized and consistent training. However, it is essential for both learners and educators to remain critical in evaluating AI-generated information. With continued development and thoughtful integration, AI tools like custom GPTs have the potential to significantly enhance the quality and accessibility of medical education.[Box: see text].

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Teacher
Medical Teacher 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.50%
发文量
396
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Teacher provides accounts of new teaching methods, guidance on structuring courses and assessing achievement, and serves as a forum for communication between medical teachers and those involved in general education. In particular, the journal recognizes the problems teachers have in keeping up-to-date with the developments in educational methods that lead to more effective teaching and learning at a time when the content of the curriculum—from medical procedures to policy changes in health care provision—is also changing. The journal features reports of innovation and research in medical education, case studies, survey articles, practical guidelines, reviews of current literature and book reviews. All articles are peer reviewed.
期刊最新文献
Blind spots in medical education - International perspectives. Breaking down barriers and building up facilitators of lecture free curriculum in medical education: An interpretive structural modeling. Physical and biophysical markers of assessment in medical training: A scoping review of the literature. Proposing the Community Triad Model to action social accountability in medical schools. Was it all worth it? A graduating resident perspective on CBME.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1