Evaluating Short-course Antibiotic Therapy for Pediatric Community-acquired Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal Pub Date : 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1097/INF.0000000000004749
Erdenetuya Bolormaa, Cho Ryok Kang, Young June Choe, Young Yoo, Jue Seong Lee, Ji Young Park, Seung Ah Choe, Giannoula S Tansarli, Eleftherios Mylonakis
{"title":"Evaluating Short-course Antibiotic Therapy for Pediatric Community-acquired Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Erdenetuya Bolormaa, Cho Ryok Kang, Young June Choe, Young Yoo, Jue Seong Lee, Ji Young Park, Seung Ah Choe, Giannoula S Tansarli, Eleftherios Mylonakis","doi":"10.1097/INF.0000000000004749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal duration of antibiotic therapy for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in children remains uncertain. In this study, we aimed to evaluate whether short-course antibiotic therapy (≤6 days) is associated with poor clinical outcomes compared with long-course antibiotic therapy (>7 days) in children with CAP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was conducted across databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed. Studies comparing the efficacy and safety of short-course with long-course antibiotic regimens in children with CAP were eligible. We assessed the risk of bias using the RoB 2 and ROBINS-I tools. Study characteristics such as publication year, country, setting, study design and antibiotic regimens were recorded. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for clinical outcomes, including clinical cure, treatment failure, total adverse events, serious adverse events, relapse and hospitalization. The primary outcomes were clinical cure and treatment failure. Secondary outcomes included total and serious adverse events, relapse and hospitalization rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen studies comprising 155,944 children met the inclusion criteria, with 15 of these studies being randomized controlled trials. There were no significant differences between short-course and long-course treatments in clinical cure [21,156 patients; RR, 1.01 (95% CI, 0.97-1.05); P = 0.73; I² = 81%], treatment failure [28,942 patients; RR, 0.88 (95% CI, 0.51-1.51); P = 0.64; I² = 94%] or total adverse events [24,446 children; RR, 0.94 (95% CI, 0.61-1.44); P = 0.77; I² = 90%]. However, short-course treatment was associated with fewer serious adverse events [4194 patients; RR, 0.89 (95% CI, 0.79-0.99); P = 0.04; I² = 11%]. Relapse rates were nominally lower with short-course treatment compared with long-course treatments (5.5% vs. 6.2%; P = 0.04). This difference was primarily observed in the subgroup analysis comparing 5-day treatments to ≥10-day treatments. Hospitalization rates were similar between the two groups [122,607 patients; RR, 1.20 (95% CI, 0.85-1.68); P = 0.29; I² = 0%].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Short-course antibiotic treatment is as effective as long-course treatment for pediatric CAP in terms of clinical cure and treatment failure while resulting in fewer serious adverse events.</p>","PeriodicalId":19858,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal","volume":" ","pages":"637-644"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/INF.0000000000004749","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The optimal duration of antibiotic therapy for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in children remains uncertain. In this study, we aimed to evaluate whether short-course antibiotic therapy (≤6 days) is associated with poor clinical outcomes compared with long-course antibiotic therapy (>7 days) in children with CAP.

Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted across databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed. Studies comparing the efficacy and safety of short-course with long-course antibiotic regimens in children with CAP were eligible. We assessed the risk of bias using the RoB 2 and ROBINS-I tools. Study characteristics such as publication year, country, setting, study design and antibiotic regimens were recorded. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for clinical outcomes, including clinical cure, treatment failure, total adverse events, serious adverse events, relapse and hospitalization. The primary outcomes were clinical cure and treatment failure. Secondary outcomes included total and serious adverse events, relapse and hospitalization rates.

Results: Seventeen studies comprising 155,944 children met the inclusion criteria, with 15 of these studies being randomized controlled trials. There were no significant differences between short-course and long-course treatments in clinical cure [21,156 patients; RR, 1.01 (95% CI, 0.97-1.05); P = 0.73; I² = 81%], treatment failure [28,942 patients; RR, 0.88 (95% CI, 0.51-1.51); P = 0.64; I² = 94%] or total adverse events [24,446 children; RR, 0.94 (95% CI, 0.61-1.44); P = 0.77; I² = 90%]. However, short-course treatment was associated with fewer serious adverse events [4194 patients; RR, 0.89 (95% CI, 0.79-0.99); P = 0.04; I² = 11%]. Relapse rates were nominally lower with short-course treatment compared with long-course treatments (5.5% vs. 6.2%; P = 0.04). This difference was primarily observed in the subgroup analysis comparing 5-day treatments to ≥10-day treatments. Hospitalization rates were similar between the two groups [122,607 patients; RR, 1.20 (95% CI, 0.85-1.68); P = 0.29; I² = 0%].

Conclusions: Short-course antibiotic treatment is as effective as long-course treatment for pediatric CAP in terms of clinical cure and treatment failure while resulting in fewer serious adverse events.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估儿童社区获得性肺炎的短期抗生素治疗:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:儿童社区获得性肺炎(CAP)的最佳抗生素治疗时间仍不确定。在这项研究中,我们旨在评估短期抗生素治疗(≤6天)与长期抗生素治疗(bbb7天)相比是否与cap患儿较差的临床结果相关。方法:对包括PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library和KoreaMed在内的数据库进行全面检索。比较短期和长期抗生素治疗儿童CAP的有效性和安全性的研究是合格的。我们使用rob2和ROBINS-I工具评估偏倚风险。记录研究特征,如出版年份、国家、环境、研究设计和抗生素治疗方案。计算临床结局的合并风险比(rr)和95%可信区间(ci),包括临床治愈、治疗失败、总不良事件、严重不良事件、复发和住院。主要结局为临床治愈和治疗失败。次要结局包括总不良事件和严重不良事件、复发率和住院率。结果:包括155,944名儿童的17项研究符合纳入标准,其中15项研究为随机对照试验。短期治疗与长期治疗临床治愈无显著差异[21,156例];Rr, 1.01 (95% ci, 0.97-1.05);P = 0.73;I²= 81%],治疗失败[28,942例;Rr, 0.88 (95% ci, 0.51-1.51);P = 0.64;I²= 94%]或总不良事件[24,446名儿童;Rr, 0.94 (95% ci, 0.61-1.44);P = 0.77;I²= 90%]。然而,短期治疗与较少的严重不良事件相关[4194例患者;Rr, 0.89 (95% ci, 0.79-0.99);P = 0.04;I²= 11%]。与长期治疗相比,短期治疗的复发率名义上较低(5.5% vs. 6.2%;P = 0.04)。这种差异主要是在比较5天治疗和≥10天治疗的亚组分析中观察到的。两组的住院率相似[122,607例;Rr, 1.20 (95% ci, 0.85-1.68);P = 0.29;I²= 0%]。结论:短期抗生素治疗小儿CAP在临床治愈和治疗失败方面与长期抗生素治疗效果相当,严重不良事件较少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
2.80%
发文量
566
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal® (PIDJ) is a complete, up-to-the-minute resource on infectious diseases in children. Through a mix of original studies, informative review articles, and unique case reports, PIDJ delivers the latest insights on combating disease in children — from state-of-the-art diagnostic techniques to the most effective drug therapies and other treatment protocols. It is a resource that can improve patient care and stimulate your personal research.
期刊最新文献
SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Prevalence and Associated Factors in COVID-19-Unvaccinated Children: A Cross-sectional Study. Breakthrough Invasive Fungal Infections in Pediatric Acute Myeloid and Lymphoblastic Leukemia Receiving Mold-active Prophylaxis. Concordance of Pathogenic Bacteria in the Upper and Lower Airway in Children With Severe Viral Lower Respiratory Tract Infections. Immunogenicity of Three-session Intradermal Rabies Post-exposure Prophylaxis in Indian Children and Adolescents. Standardizing Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Pediatric Patients Requiring Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1