Cystic fibrosis patients’ preferences for electronic devices that monitor their inhalation – A qualitative study

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Respiratory medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-31 DOI:10.1016/j.rmed.2025.107980
Lyan Betsema , Mingshi Yang , Adam Bohr , Aitana Herrera , Susanne Kaae
{"title":"Cystic fibrosis patients’ preferences for electronic devices that monitor their inhalation – A qualitative study","authors":"Lyan Betsema ,&nbsp;Mingshi Yang ,&nbsp;Adam Bohr ,&nbsp;Aitana Herrera ,&nbsp;Susanne Kaae","doi":"10.1016/j.rmed.2025.107980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) use inhaled medicines daily due to respiratory manifestations. However, only 31 % of users is inhaling correctly. Digital solutions targeting inhalation could help CF patients improve their technique and thus health outcomes. However, the use of electronic monitoring devices shows a decrease over time. Therefore, the aim of study was to investigate CF patients’ preferences for the use of electronic devices on their inhalation technique on a regular basis and reasons behind these preferences.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Semistructured interviews were conducted with 11 CF patients from four European countries to understand their disease history and experiences, daily use of inhaler medication, experiences with digital devices to achieve disease control, and expectations of new devices for monitoring inhalation. A conventional content analysis was applied.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>CF patients knew their body well due to their lifelong experiences. However, some patients still experienced periods with more symptoms and need for support. Non-app support was preferred. CF patients reported that digital systems should provide high benefits for regular use. Patients differed in their interest in digital systems for inhalation. Such systems were mostly relevant to CF patients starting a new inhaled treatment/inhaler device or during periods in which the disease was out of control.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>CF patients perceived limited value of digital systems to monitor their inhalation and mostly considered them necessary for specific periods. Extensive experience in using inhalers and existing daily routines to manage a high treatment burden appear involved in limited need of such systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21057,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory medicine","volume":"238 ","pages":"Article 107980"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0954611125000423","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) use inhaled medicines daily due to respiratory manifestations. However, only 31 % of users is inhaling correctly. Digital solutions targeting inhalation could help CF patients improve their technique and thus health outcomes. However, the use of electronic monitoring devices shows a decrease over time. Therefore, the aim of study was to investigate CF patients’ preferences for the use of electronic devices on their inhalation technique on a regular basis and reasons behind these preferences.

Methods

Semistructured interviews were conducted with 11 CF patients from four European countries to understand their disease history and experiences, daily use of inhaler medication, experiences with digital devices to achieve disease control, and expectations of new devices for monitoring inhalation. A conventional content analysis was applied.

Results

CF patients knew their body well due to their lifelong experiences. However, some patients still experienced periods with more symptoms and need for support. Non-app support was preferred. CF patients reported that digital systems should provide high benefits for regular use. Patients differed in their interest in digital systems for inhalation. Such systems were mostly relevant to CF patients starting a new inhaled treatment/inhaler device or during periods in which the disease was out of control.

Conclusions

CF patients perceived limited value of digital systems to monitor their inhalation and mostly considered them necessary for specific periods. Extensive experience in using inhalers and existing daily routines to manage a high treatment burden appear involved in limited need of such systems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Respiratory medicine
Respiratory medicine 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
199
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Respiratory Medicine is an internationally-renowned journal devoted to the rapid publication of clinically-relevant respiratory medicine research. It combines cutting-edge original research with state-of-the-art reviews dealing with all aspects of respiratory diseases and therapeutic interventions. Topics include adult and paediatric medicine, epidemiology, immunology and cell biology, physiology, occupational disorders, and the role of allergens and pollutants. Respiratory Medicine is increasingly the journal of choice for publication of phased trial work, commenting on effectiveness, dosage and methods of action.
期刊最新文献
Home noninvasive ventilation in pediatric patients: Does one size fit all? Diagnostic and prognostic implications of a deep suprasternal notch in idiopathic pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis Editorial Board Health-related quality of life and symptom concordance between patients and physicians in pulmonary arterial hypertension in the United States, Europe, and Japan State-of-the-art narrative review: Mounier–Kuhn syndrome and tracheobronchomegaly
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1