A Comparative Study of End-of-Life Care Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic Using Electronic Nursing Records.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Cin-Computers Informatics Nursing Pub Date : 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1097/CIN.0000000000001258
Seul Ki Park, Sumi Sung, Yul Ha Min
{"title":"A Comparative Study of End-of-Life Care Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic Using Electronic Nursing Records.","authors":"Seul Ki Park, Sumi Sung, Yul Ha Min","doi":"10.1097/CIN.0000000000001258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to identify the end-of-life care provided to patients admitted to a ward using electronic nursing records standardized with SNOMED CT (Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms) and to analyze changes in end-of-life care before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study setting was oncology or hematology-oncology wards in a tertiary care hospital. A total of 161 069 nursing statements for 600 patients before COVID-19, admitted from January 2018 to December 2019, and 110 333 nursing statements for 454 patients during COVID-19, admitted from January 2020 to December 2021, were extracted from the clinical data warehouse of the study hospital. We mapped 427 unique nursing statements to SNOMED CT. The differences in the number of SNOMED CT concepts among the three groups-patients before COVID-19, patients without COVID-19 during COVID-19, and patients with COVID-19 during COVID-19-were analyzed using analysis of variance. \"Acute pain,\" \"Patient on oxygen,\" \"Notification of physician,\" \"Oxygenation monitoring,\" and \"Pain assessment\" were recorded most frequently. The frequency of nursing statements related to oxygenation was significantly lower in patients without COVID-19 during the COVID-19 pandemic compared with patients before COVID-19. Nursing statements pertaining to emotional or spiritual care appeared to be underrepresented in both the nursing assessment/outcome and nursing intervention domains. Our study showed that the standardized nursing records can be used as a source of information to explore changes in end-of-life care before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":50694,"journal":{"name":"Cin-Computers Informatics Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cin-Computers Informatics Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CIN.0000000000001258","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to identify the end-of-life care provided to patients admitted to a ward using electronic nursing records standardized with SNOMED CT (Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms) and to analyze changes in end-of-life care before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study setting was oncology or hematology-oncology wards in a tertiary care hospital. A total of 161 069 nursing statements for 600 patients before COVID-19, admitted from January 2018 to December 2019, and 110 333 nursing statements for 454 patients during COVID-19, admitted from January 2020 to December 2021, were extracted from the clinical data warehouse of the study hospital. We mapped 427 unique nursing statements to SNOMED CT. The differences in the number of SNOMED CT concepts among the three groups-patients before COVID-19, patients without COVID-19 during COVID-19, and patients with COVID-19 during COVID-19-were analyzed using analysis of variance. "Acute pain," "Patient on oxygen," "Notification of physician," "Oxygenation monitoring," and "Pain assessment" were recorded most frequently. The frequency of nursing statements related to oxygenation was significantly lower in patients without COVID-19 during the COVID-19 pandemic compared with patients before COVID-19. Nursing statements pertaining to emotional or spiritual care appeared to be underrepresented in both the nursing assessment/outcome and nursing intervention domains. Our study showed that the standardized nursing records can be used as a source of information to explore changes in end-of-life care before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cin-Computers Informatics Nursing
Cin-Computers Informatics Nursing 工程技术-护理
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
15.40%
发文量
248
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: For over 30 years, CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing has been at the interface of the science of information and the art of nursing, publishing articles on the latest developments in nursing informatics, research, education and administrative of health information technology. CIN connects you with colleagues as they share knowledge on implementation of electronic health records systems, design decision-support systems, incorporate evidence-based healthcare in practice, explore point-of-care computing in practice and education, and conceptually integrate nursing languages and standard data sets. Continuing education contact hours are available in every issue.
期刊最新文献
Health Literacy-Based Heart Failure Self-care (H2Lit) Application: Development and Usability Testing. Effects of a Modified Nurse Training Program on Completion Rate of Forms and Assessments in the Electronic Medical Record. A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review on the Impacts and Implementation of Collaborative Electronic Documentation on Nurse-Patient Relationship. Exploring Suitability of Low-Severity Rating Hospital Incident Reports for Machine Learning. Factors Influencing eHealth Literacy Related to Parenting Among Asian Immigrant Mothers in South Korea.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1