A comparative study of the performance of ten metaheuristic algorithms for parameter estimation of solar photovoltaic models.

IF 2.5 4区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE PeerJ Computer Science Pub Date : 2025-01-27 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.7717/peerj-cs.2646
Adel Zga, Farouq Zitouni, Saad Harous, Karam Sallam, Abdulaziz S Almazyad, Guojiang Xiong, Ali Wagdy Mohamed
{"title":"A comparative study of the performance of ten metaheuristic algorithms for parameter estimation of solar photovoltaic models.","authors":"Adel Zga, Farouq Zitouni, Saad Harous, Karam Sallam, Abdulaziz S Almazyad, Guojiang Xiong, Ali Wagdy Mohamed","doi":"10.7717/peerj-cs.2646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study conducts a comparative analysis of the performance of ten novel and well-performing metaheuristic algorithms for parameter estimation of solar photovoltaic models. This optimization problem involves accurately identifying parameters that reflect the complex and nonlinear behaviours of photovoltaic cells affected by changing environmental conditions and material inconsistencies. This estimation is challenging due to computational complexity and the risk of optimization errors, which can hinder reliable performance predictions. The algorithms evaluated include the Crayfish Optimization Algorithm, the Golf Optimization Algorithm, the Coati Optimization Algorithm, the Crested Porcupine Optimizer, the Growth Optimizer, the Artificial Protozoa Optimizer, the Secretary Bird Optimization Algorithm, the Mother Optimization Algorithm, the Election Optimizer Algorithm, and the Technical and Vocational Education and Training-Based Optimizer. These algorithms are applied to solve four well-established photovoltaic models: the single-diode model, the double-diode model, the triple-diode model, and different photovoltaic module models. The study focuses on key performance metrics such as execution time, number of function evaluations, and solution optimality. The results reveal significant differences in the efficiency and accuracy of the algorithms, with some algorithms demonstrating superior performance in specific models. The Friedman test was utilized to rank the performance of the various algorithms, revealing the Growth Optimizer as the top performer across all the considered models. This optimizer achieved a root mean square error of 9.8602187789E-04 for the single-diode model, 9.8248487610E-04 for both the double-diode and triple-diode models and 1.2307306856E-02 for the photovoltaic module model. This consistent success indicates that the Growth Optimizer is a strong contender for future enhancements aimed at further boosting its efficiency and effectiveness. Its current performance suggests significant potential for improvement, making it a promising focus for ongoing development efforts. The findings contribute to the understanding of the applicability and performance of metaheuristic algorithms in renewable energy systems, providing valuable insights for optimizing photovoltaic models.</p>","PeriodicalId":54224,"journal":{"name":"PeerJ Computer Science","volume":"11 ","pages":"e2646"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11784897/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PeerJ Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.2646","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study conducts a comparative analysis of the performance of ten novel and well-performing metaheuristic algorithms for parameter estimation of solar photovoltaic models. This optimization problem involves accurately identifying parameters that reflect the complex and nonlinear behaviours of photovoltaic cells affected by changing environmental conditions and material inconsistencies. This estimation is challenging due to computational complexity and the risk of optimization errors, which can hinder reliable performance predictions. The algorithms evaluated include the Crayfish Optimization Algorithm, the Golf Optimization Algorithm, the Coati Optimization Algorithm, the Crested Porcupine Optimizer, the Growth Optimizer, the Artificial Protozoa Optimizer, the Secretary Bird Optimization Algorithm, the Mother Optimization Algorithm, the Election Optimizer Algorithm, and the Technical and Vocational Education and Training-Based Optimizer. These algorithms are applied to solve four well-established photovoltaic models: the single-diode model, the double-diode model, the triple-diode model, and different photovoltaic module models. The study focuses on key performance metrics such as execution time, number of function evaluations, and solution optimality. The results reveal significant differences in the efficiency and accuracy of the algorithms, with some algorithms demonstrating superior performance in specific models. The Friedman test was utilized to rank the performance of the various algorithms, revealing the Growth Optimizer as the top performer across all the considered models. This optimizer achieved a root mean square error of 9.8602187789E-04 for the single-diode model, 9.8248487610E-04 for both the double-diode and triple-diode models and 1.2307306856E-02 for the photovoltaic module model. This consistent success indicates that the Growth Optimizer is a strong contender for future enhancements aimed at further boosting its efficiency and effectiveness. Its current performance suggests significant potential for improvement, making it a promising focus for ongoing development efforts. The findings contribute to the understanding of the applicability and performance of metaheuristic algorithms in renewable energy systems, providing valuable insights for optimizing photovoltaic models.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
太阳能光伏模型参数估计的十种元启发式算法的性能比较研究。
本研究比较分析了十种新型且性能良好的太阳能光伏模型参数估计元启发式算法的性能。该优化问题涉及准确识别反映光伏电池受环境条件变化和材料不一致性影响的复杂和非线性行为的参数。由于计算复杂性和优化错误的风险,这种估计具有挑战性,这可能会阻碍可靠的性能预测。评估的算法包括小龙虾优化算法、高尔夫优化算法、浣熊优化算法、冠毛豪猪优化算法、生长优化算法、人工原生动物优化算法、秘书鸟优化算法、母亲优化算法、选举优化算法以及基于技术和职业教育和培训的优化算法。应用这些算法求解了四种成熟的光伏模型:单二极管模型、双二极管模型、三二极管模型和不同的光伏组件模型。该研究侧重于关键性能指标,如执行时间、函数评估次数和解决方案最优性。结果表明,算法在效率和精度上存在显著差异,有些算法在特定模型中表现出更好的性能。Friedman测试用于对各种算法的性能进行排名,揭示Growth Optimizer在所有考虑的模型中表现最佳。该优化器对单二极管模型的均方根误差为9.8602187789E-04,双二极管和三二极管模型的均方根误差为9.8248487610E-04,光伏组件模型的均方根误差为1.2307306856E-02。这种持续的成功表明,增长优化器是未来增强的有力竞争者,旨在进一步提高其效率和有效性。它目前的性能表明有很大的改进潜力,使它成为正在进行的开发工作的一个有希望的焦点。这些发现有助于理解元启发式算法在可再生能源系统中的适用性和性能,为优化光伏模型提供有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
PeerJ Computer Science
PeerJ Computer Science Computer Science-General Computer Science
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
5.30%
发文量
332
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: PeerJ Computer Science is the new open access journal covering all subject areas in computer science, with the backing of a prestigious advisory board and more than 300 academic editors.
期刊最新文献
A new era in identification of tick genera; artificial intelligence for precision and speed. MS-YieldStackNet: multi-source data fusion for wheat yield estimation using a stacked ensemble neural network. A hybrid algorithmic model for enhancing security in intelligent reflecting surface-assisted wireless communication. Robust coffee plant disease classification using deep learning and advanced feature engineering techniques. KomoTrip: a multi-day travel itinerary recommendation method based on the discrete komodo mlipir algorithm.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1