Dynamically examining emergency response network resilience: A case study of a typical earthquake in China

IF 4.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Safety Science Pub Date : 2024-12-30 DOI:10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106766
Fei Sun , Jiawen Zhou , Shiyu Hu , Ruoyi Zhang , Huige Xing
{"title":"Dynamically examining emergency response network resilience: A case study of a typical earthquake in China","authors":"Fei Sun ,&nbsp;Jiawen Zhou ,&nbsp;Shiyu Hu ,&nbsp;Ruoyi Zhang ,&nbsp;Huige Xing","doi":"10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The combination of multi-subject collaboration and organizational resilience strategies has recently become a significant research topic in disaster emergency response. Dynamically identifying emergency response network (ERN) resilience characteristics is essential for understanding multi-organizational collaboration and enhancing organizational response capabilities and efficiency. This study, from an integrated perspective of inherent resilience and adaptive resilience, proposed a dynamic analysis framework for ERN resilience. First, based on key resilience characteristics—adaptability, robustness, resourcefulness, and rapidity—an ERN resilience evaluation framework was constructed. The study then selected the 2022 Luding earthquake as a case study, dividing it into four periods and using social network analysis metrics to dynamically measure ERN resilience and its inherent organizational impact. The results showed that 1) earthquake ERN resilience exhibited dynamic adaptability and forward adaptability; 2) ERN resilience was significantly associated with organizational attributes and behaviors; and 3) ERN robustness was influenced by network cohesion and organizational distribution. Finally, recommendations were made to enhance disaster ERN resilience by optimizing organizational structure and responsibility allocation, improving emergency planning, and managing materials. This research provides a novel dynamic analytical framework for building disaster resilience and offers valuable insights into multi-stakeholder disaster governance for earthquake disaster resilience worldwide.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21375,"journal":{"name":"Safety Science","volume":"184 ","pages":"Article 106766"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Safety Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925753524003564","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The combination of multi-subject collaboration and organizational resilience strategies has recently become a significant research topic in disaster emergency response. Dynamically identifying emergency response network (ERN) resilience characteristics is essential for understanding multi-organizational collaboration and enhancing organizational response capabilities and efficiency. This study, from an integrated perspective of inherent resilience and adaptive resilience, proposed a dynamic analysis framework for ERN resilience. First, based on key resilience characteristics—adaptability, robustness, resourcefulness, and rapidity—an ERN resilience evaluation framework was constructed. The study then selected the 2022 Luding earthquake as a case study, dividing it into four periods and using social network analysis metrics to dynamically measure ERN resilience and its inherent organizational impact. The results showed that 1) earthquake ERN resilience exhibited dynamic adaptability and forward adaptability; 2) ERN resilience was significantly associated with organizational attributes and behaviors; and 3) ERN robustness was influenced by network cohesion and organizational distribution. Finally, recommendations were made to enhance disaster ERN resilience by optimizing organizational structure and responsibility allocation, improving emergency planning, and managing materials. This research provides a novel dynamic analytical framework for building disaster resilience and offers valuable insights into multi-stakeholder disaster governance for earthquake disaster resilience worldwide.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Safety Science
Safety Science 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
9.80%
发文量
335
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Safety Science is multidisciplinary. Its contributors and its audience range from social scientists to engineers. The journal covers the physics and engineering of safety; its social, policy and organizational aspects; the assessment, management and communication of risks; the effectiveness of control and management techniques for safety; standardization, legislation, inspection, insurance, costing aspects, human behavior and safety and the like. Papers addressing the interfaces between technology, people and organizations are especially welcome.
期刊最新文献
Teaching children to cross safely: A full-immersive virtual reality training method for young pedestrians Improving occupational safety and health motivation through a dialogue-based inspection practice How risk preference affects evacuees’ route choice in buildings: An IVR-based experimental study Behavioral and psychophysiological responses of initial pilots in collaboration with an experienced but risky captain: A flight-simulation study based on the social facilitation Development and empirical examination of the acceptance of a hazard identification and safety training system based on VR technology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1