Organising AI for safety: Identifying structural vulnerabilities to guide the design of AI-enhanced socio-technical systems

IF 5.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Safety Science Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-12 DOI:10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106731
Alexandros Gazos , James Kahn , Isabel Kusche , Christian Büscher , Markus Götz
{"title":"Organising AI for safety: Identifying structural vulnerabilities to guide the design of AI-enhanced socio-technical systems","authors":"Alexandros Gazos ,&nbsp;James Kahn ,&nbsp;Isabel Kusche ,&nbsp;Christian Büscher ,&nbsp;Markus Götz","doi":"10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Artificial intelligence is increasingly being integrated into socio-technical systems. Existing design principles for ethical, safe and trustworthy AI tend to be highly abstract and focus on AI systems in isolation. They have rarely considered the adverse effects on safety that may emerge from interactions between AI and other technical components. Organisational theories of safety take such emergent outcomes of interactions between entities in socio-technical systems into account. They offer guidance on how to identify structural vulnerabilities in socio-technical systems enhanced by AI, and how to organise the design and operation of such systems for safety. In this paper, which is the result of a collaboration between sociologists and computer scientists (AI consultants), we conduct an analysis that can support the process of designing AI-enhanced autonomous systems in order to avoid structural vulnerabilities. It builds on organisational theories of safety and derives five key descriptors from them, the examination of which can guide the design of AI-enhanced systems. We demonstrate the utility of the descriptors by applying them to proposals for AI-enhanced critical functions in advanced microgrids. We discuss these proposals from the research literature on microgrids and review their effects on structural vulnerabilities. We then explore the implications that go beyond the example of advanced microgrids and propose steps for reviewing and reflecting on structural vulnerabilities that AI controllers may introduce into socio-technical systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21375,"journal":{"name":"Safety Science","volume":"184 ","pages":"Article 106731"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Safety Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925753524003217","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial intelligence is increasingly being integrated into socio-technical systems. Existing design principles for ethical, safe and trustworthy AI tend to be highly abstract and focus on AI systems in isolation. They have rarely considered the adverse effects on safety that may emerge from interactions between AI and other technical components. Organisational theories of safety take such emergent outcomes of interactions between entities in socio-technical systems into account. They offer guidance on how to identify structural vulnerabilities in socio-technical systems enhanced by AI, and how to organise the design and operation of such systems for safety. In this paper, which is the result of a collaboration between sociologists and computer scientists (AI consultants), we conduct an analysis that can support the process of designing AI-enhanced autonomous systems in order to avoid structural vulnerabilities. It builds on organisational theories of safety and derives five key descriptors from them, the examination of which can guide the design of AI-enhanced systems. We demonstrate the utility of the descriptors by applying them to proposals for AI-enhanced critical functions in advanced microgrids. We discuss these proposals from the research literature on microgrids and review their effects on structural vulnerabilities. We then explore the implications that go beyond the example of advanced microgrids and propose steps for reviewing and reflecting on structural vulnerabilities that AI controllers may introduce into socio-technical systems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为安全组织人工智能:识别结构性脆弱性,以指导人工智能增强的社会技术系统的设计
人工智能正日益融入社会技术系统。现有的道德、安全和可信的人工智能设计原则往往高度抽象,并且孤立地关注人工智能系统。他们很少考虑人工智能与其他技术组件之间的相互作用可能对安全产生的不利影响。安全的组织理论考虑到社会技术系统中实体之间相互作用的紧急结果。它们就如何识别人工智能增强的社会技术系统中的结构性脆弱性,以及如何组织此类系统的安全设计和运行提供了指导。这篇论文是社会学家和计算机科学家(人工智能顾问)合作的结果,我们进行了一项分析,可以支持设计人工智能增强的自主系统的过程,以避免结构性漏洞。它建立在安全组织理论的基础上,并从中得出五个关键描述符,对这些描述符的研究可以指导人工智能增强系统的设计。我们通过将描述符应用于先进微电网中人工智能增强关键功能的建议来展示描述符的效用。我们从微电网研究文献中讨论了这些建议,并回顾了它们对结构脆弱性的影响。然后,我们探讨了超越先进微电网示例的影响,并提出了审查和反思人工智能控制器可能引入社会技术系统的结构漏洞的步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Safety Science
Safety Science 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
9.80%
发文量
335
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Safety Science is multidisciplinary. Its contributors and its audience range from social scientists to engineers. The journal covers the physics and engineering of safety; its social, policy and organizational aspects; the assessment, management and communication of risks; the effectiveness of control and management techniques for safety; standardization, legislation, inspection, insurance, costing aspects, human behavior and safety and the like. Papers addressing the interfaces between technology, people and organizations are especially welcome.
期刊最新文献
Electric motorcycle crash severity: a random parameters logit model considering interaction effects and counterfactual policy evaluation Enablers of Quantitative Risk Assessments in Major Hazard Facilities versus those in Fire Safety Engineering Driving safety excellence: A multifaceted analysis of leading indicators across industries Safety, identity, and inequity at the last mile: a qualitative study of app-based bicycle delivery riders in Spain Psychometric validation of the Turkish Short form of the disaster resilience scale for individuals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1