{"title":"Reconstructing construction safety Training: A systematic review based on learning theories and instructional design principles","authors":"Mahdi Rasouli , Hossein Karimi , Javad Hatami","doi":"10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The construction industry faces a high rate of safety accidents. Despite being a critical component of safety management, safety training often falls short of expectations. This shortcoming has been attributed to the insufficient integration of Learning Theories (LTs) and Instructional Design (ID) principles in Construction Safety Training (CST). This paper presents a systematic review of CST, incorporating insights from prominent ID sources, including ID elements (objective, session <span><span>scheduling</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>, content, tools and methods, learning tasks, and evaluation) and the most prominent LTs. The extent of adherence to these principles and theories in previous CST studies has been evaluated by reviewing 48 CST papers to identify opportunities for improvement. Recommendations for enhancing future CSTs include a) targeting Affective objectives, b) avoiding single-session condensed training, c) incorporating task-based training, d) conducting follow-up and long-term evaluations of knowledge and behavior, and e) incorporating LTs and Principles of Instruction explicitly and systematically. This study compared student training with site worker training, as well as training with and without computer tools, to identify gaps and provide tailored recommendations to improve each type of training. The findings lay the groundwork for integrating ID knowledge into CST, avoiding ID errors, and ultimately enhancing CST’s efficiency to reduce accidents.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21375,"journal":{"name":"Safety Science","volume":"184 ","pages":"Article 106769"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Safety Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092575352400359X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The construction industry faces a high rate of safety accidents. Despite being a critical component of safety management, safety training often falls short of expectations. This shortcoming has been attributed to the insufficient integration of Learning Theories (LTs) and Instructional Design (ID) principles in Construction Safety Training (CST). This paper presents a systematic review of CST, incorporating insights from prominent ID sources, including ID elements (objective, session scheduling, content, tools and methods, learning tasks, and evaluation) and the most prominent LTs. The extent of adherence to these principles and theories in previous CST studies has been evaluated by reviewing 48 CST papers to identify opportunities for improvement. Recommendations for enhancing future CSTs include a) targeting Affective objectives, b) avoiding single-session condensed training, c) incorporating task-based training, d) conducting follow-up and long-term evaluations of knowledge and behavior, and e) incorporating LTs and Principles of Instruction explicitly and systematically. This study compared student training with site worker training, as well as training with and without computer tools, to identify gaps and provide tailored recommendations to improve each type of training. The findings lay the groundwork for integrating ID knowledge into CST, avoiding ID errors, and ultimately enhancing CST’s efficiency to reduce accidents.
期刊介绍:
Safety Science is multidisciplinary. Its contributors and its audience range from social scientists to engineers. The journal covers the physics and engineering of safety; its social, policy and organizational aspects; the assessment, management and communication of risks; the effectiveness of control and management techniques for safety; standardization, legislation, inspection, insurance, costing aspects, human behavior and safety and the like. Papers addressing the interfaces between technology, people and organizations are especially welcome.