Who reaps the benefits of smart management of neighborhood complaints?: Impact of online participatory forums on neighborhood equity

IF 6 1区 经济学 Q1 URBAN STUDIES Cities Pub Date : 2025-01-06 DOI:10.1016/j.cities.2025.105716
Wonhyung Lee , Kelly J. Gross , Christopher Yong , Charalampos Chelmis , Daphney-Stavroula Zois
{"title":"Who reaps the benefits of smart management of neighborhood complaints?: Impact of online participatory forums on neighborhood equity","authors":"Wonhyung Lee ,&nbsp;Kelly J. Gross ,&nbsp;Christopher Yong ,&nbsp;Charalampos Chelmis ,&nbsp;Daphney-Stavroula Zois","doi":"10.1016/j.cities.2025.105716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Online platforms have been increasingly in use for reporting neighborhood issues. SeeClickFix is one of these tools implemented, through which citizens can report non-emergency maintenance issues, such as potholes, noise complains or illegal graffiti, to the local governments. In this paper, we analyzed SeeClickFix data to examine whether there were any variances across neighborhoods in their issue-reporting patterns and the likelihood of their problems being acknowledged and resolved by the government. Our findings reveal that higher-income neighborhoods are more likely to report issues and experience higher response rates. Walkability was also associated with more reporting. We additionally conducted street observations to confirm that socioeconomically more stable neighborhoods have a higher tendency to report issues. These findings carry important implications for who takes advantage of the technology designed for civic engagement and, as a result, reaps the benefits for improving their living environments. Future research and practice will need to consider these implications to achieve neighborhood equity in the era of rapid technological advancements and remote service deliveries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48405,"journal":{"name":"Cities","volume":"158 ","pages":"Article 105716"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cities","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275125000162","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Online platforms have been increasingly in use for reporting neighborhood issues. SeeClickFix is one of these tools implemented, through which citizens can report non-emergency maintenance issues, such as potholes, noise complains or illegal graffiti, to the local governments. In this paper, we analyzed SeeClickFix data to examine whether there were any variances across neighborhoods in their issue-reporting patterns and the likelihood of their problems being acknowledged and resolved by the government. Our findings reveal that higher-income neighborhoods are more likely to report issues and experience higher response rates. Walkability was also associated with more reporting. We additionally conducted street observations to confirm that socioeconomically more stable neighborhoods have a higher tendency to report issues. These findings carry important implications for who takes advantage of the technology designed for civic engagement and, as a result, reaps the benefits for improving their living environments. Future research and practice will need to consider these implications to achieve neighborhood equity in the era of rapid technological advancements and remote service deliveries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cities
Cities URBAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
9.00%
发文量
517
期刊介绍: Cities offers a comprehensive range of articles on all aspects of urban policy. It provides an international and interdisciplinary platform for the exchange of ideas and information between urban planners and policy makers from national and local government, non-government organizations, academia and consultancy. The primary aims of the journal are to analyse and assess past and present urban development and management as a reflection of effective, ineffective and non-existent planning policies; and the promotion of the implementation of appropriate urban policies in both the developed and the developing world.
期刊最新文献
Public emotions and the built environment in hazards: A case study of the Shenzhen catastrophic landslide The mechanism for the intra-city employment growth: The role of employment centers Urbanization, housing, and inclusive design for all? A community-based participatory research investigation of the health implications of high-rise environments for adolescents Gift economy as an alternative to achieve sustainable development: The case of Earthen Routes City size distribution of African countries: A spatial analysis using geospatial data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1