Who reaps the benefits of smart management of neighborhood complaints?: Impact of online participatory forums on neighborhood equity

IF 6.6 1区 经济学 Q1 URBAN STUDIES Cities Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-06 DOI:10.1016/j.cities.2025.105716
Wonhyung Lee , Kelly J. Gross , Christopher Yong , Charalampos Chelmis , Daphney-Stavroula Zois
{"title":"Who reaps the benefits of smart management of neighborhood complaints?: Impact of online participatory forums on neighborhood equity","authors":"Wonhyung Lee ,&nbsp;Kelly J. Gross ,&nbsp;Christopher Yong ,&nbsp;Charalampos Chelmis ,&nbsp;Daphney-Stavroula Zois","doi":"10.1016/j.cities.2025.105716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Online platforms have been increasingly in use for reporting neighborhood issues. SeeClickFix is one of these tools implemented, through which citizens can report non-emergency maintenance issues, such as potholes, noise complains or illegal graffiti, to the local governments. In this paper, we analyzed SeeClickFix data to examine whether there were any variances across neighborhoods in their issue-reporting patterns and the likelihood of their problems being acknowledged and resolved by the government. Our findings reveal that higher-income neighborhoods are more likely to report issues and experience higher response rates. Walkability was also associated with more reporting. We additionally conducted street observations to confirm that socioeconomically more stable neighborhoods have a higher tendency to report issues. These findings carry important implications for who takes advantage of the technology designed for civic engagement and, as a result, reaps the benefits for improving their living environments. Future research and practice will need to consider these implications to achieve neighborhood equity in the era of rapid technological advancements and remote service deliveries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48405,"journal":{"name":"Cities","volume":"158 ","pages":"Article 105716"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cities","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275125000162","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Online platforms have been increasingly in use for reporting neighborhood issues. SeeClickFix is one of these tools implemented, through which citizens can report non-emergency maintenance issues, such as potholes, noise complains or illegal graffiti, to the local governments. In this paper, we analyzed SeeClickFix data to examine whether there were any variances across neighborhoods in their issue-reporting patterns and the likelihood of their problems being acknowledged and resolved by the government. Our findings reveal that higher-income neighborhoods are more likely to report issues and experience higher response rates. Walkability was also associated with more reporting. We additionally conducted street observations to confirm that socioeconomically more stable neighborhoods have a higher tendency to report issues. These findings carry important implications for who takes advantage of the technology designed for civic engagement and, as a result, reaps the benefits for improving their living environments. Future research and practice will need to consider these implications to achieve neighborhood equity in the era of rapid technological advancements and remote service deliveries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
谁能从社区投诉的智能管理中获益?:网络参与式论坛对社区公平的影响
网络平台越来越多地用于报道社区问题。SeeClickFix是这些工具中的一种,市民可以通过它向当地政府报告非紧急维护问题,如坑洼、噪音投诉或非法涂鸦。在本文中,我们分析了SeeClickFix的数据,以检查社区之间的问题报告模式是否存在差异,以及他们的问题被政府承认和解决的可能性。我们的研究结果表明,高收入社区更有可能报告问题,并获得更高的回复率。可步行性也与更多的报告有关。我们还进行了街头观察,以证实社会经济更稳定的社区报告问题的倾向更高。这些发现对谁利用为公民参与而设计的技术具有重要意义,并因此受益于改善他们的生活环境。未来的研究和实践需要考虑这些影响,以便在技术快速进步和远程服务交付的时代实现邻里公平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cities
Cities URBAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
9.00%
发文量
517
期刊介绍: Cities offers a comprehensive range of articles on all aspects of urban policy. It provides an international and interdisciplinary platform for the exchange of ideas and information between urban planners and policy makers from national and local government, non-government organizations, academia and consultancy. The primary aims of the journal are to analyse and assess past and present urban development and management as a reflection of effective, ineffective and non-existent planning policies; and the promotion of the implementation of appropriate urban policies in both the developed and the developing world.
期刊最新文献
Street violence against women in urban spaces: A comparative analysis based on citizen perceptions and official data Linkages between changes in communal space and evolving social capital: The mediating role of neighboring interaction frequency Prestige competition: Inter-city striving for excellence and the low-carbon transition in residential energy use Gender difference in recreational active travel: The role of multi-level urban environment in safe, compact cities Urban health and inequality in access to healthy diet: Case study of Bojnourd City in Iran
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1