Exploring the intersection of food literacy and consumer research: A review, conceptualisation, and agenda for sustainability-focused research

IF 4.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Food Quality and Preference Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-13 DOI:10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105429
Sarah McManus , Donna Pendergast
{"title":"Exploring the intersection of food literacy and consumer research: A review, conceptualisation, and agenda for sustainability-focused research","authors":"Sarah McManus ,&nbsp;Donna Pendergast","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the importance of consumer food literacy competency as global food experiences were disrupted from individual to systemic levels. Consumer food illiteracy also acts as a barrier to achieve optimal health and sustainability. This study examined what is known about the intersectionality of food literacy and consumer research through a hybrid systematic review encompassing bibliometric and content analysis. Peer-reviewed journal publications (<em>N</em> = 301) meeting the inclusion criteria were analysed to consider citation, geolocational, research area, co-word, and time-phase content strategies employing VOSViewer, Microsoft Excel, and Leximancer software. Examination of the knowledge base of food literacy-consumer research reveals exponential growth in publication rates. The multidisciplinary intellectual structure of the field spans 53 diverse research areas, including consumer food label use, food consumption and choices, sustainability, health, education, skills and knowledge, social media, food security, and COVID-19 research topics. The time-phase analysis reveals that: 1) the intellectual structure of food literacy-consumer research increased in complexity over time, providing a deeper understanding of food literacy; 2) food literacy education is central to food literacy competency to encourage optimal public health and sustainability behaviours; and 3) food literacy competency can be supported through technology (social media and mobile apps) and food literacy measurement. Four propositions are presented to advance food literacy education, technology, research, and policy development. The culmination of the study is the development of the proposed Consumer Food Literacy Knowledge Model, which frames future sustainability-focused food literacy research lenses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"126 ","pages":"Article 105429"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329325000047","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the importance of consumer food literacy competency as global food experiences were disrupted from individual to systemic levels. Consumer food illiteracy also acts as a barrier to achieve optimal health and sustainability. This study examined what is known about the intersectionality of food literacy and consumer research through a hybrid systematic review encompassing bibliometric and content analysis. Peer-reviewed journal publications (N = 301) meeting the inclusion criteria were analysed to consider citation, geolocational, research area, co-word, and time-phase content strategies employing VOSViewer, Microsoft Excel, and Leximancer software. Examination of the knowledge base of food literacy-consumer research reveals exponential growth in publication rates. The multidisciplinary intellectual structure of the field spans 53 diverse research areas, including consumer food label use, food consumption and choices, sustainability, health, education, skills and knowledge, social media, food security, and COVID-19 research topics. The time-phase analysis reveals that: 1) the intellectual structure of food literacy-consumer research increased in complexity over time, providing a deeper understanding of food literacy; 2) food literacy education is central to food literacy competency to encourage optimal public health and sustainability behaviours; and 3) food literacy competency can be supported through technology (social media and mobile apps) and food literacy measurement. Four propositions are presented to advance food literacy education, technology, research, and policy development. The culmination of the study is the development of the proposed Consumer Food Literacy Knowledge Model, which frames future sustainability-focused food literacy research lenses.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索食品素养和消费者研究的交集:以可持续发展为重点的研究的回顾,概念化和议程
2019冠状病毒病大流行凸显了消费者食品素养能力的重要性,因为全球食品体验从个人到系统层面都受到了破坏。消费者对食品一无所知,也是实现最佳健康和可持续性的障碍。本研究通过包含文献计量学和内容分析的混合系统综述,检查了已知的食品素养和消费者研究的交叉性。采用VOSViewer、Microsoft Excel和Leximancer软件对符合纳入标准的同行评议期刊出版物(N = 301)进行分析,考虑引文、地理位置、研究领域、共词和时相内容策略。对食品知识基础的检查——消费者研究揭示了出版物率的指数增长。该领域的多学科知识结构跨越53个不同的研究领域,包括消费者食品标签使用、食品消费和选择、可持续性、健康、教育、技能和知识、社交媒体、粮食安全和COVID-19研究主题。时相分析表明:1)随着时间的推移,食品素养-消费者研究的智力结构复杂性增加,提供了对食品素养的更深层次的理解;2)食品素养教育是食品素养能力的核心,以鼓励最佳的公共卫生和可持续性行为;3)可以通过技术(社交媒体和移动应用程序)和食品素养测量来支持食品素养能力。提出了四项建议,以促进食品素养教育、技术、研究和政策制定。这项研究的高潮是拟议的消费者食品素养知识模型的发展,该模型框架了未来以可持续发展为重点的食品素养研究镜头。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Food Quality and Preference
Food Quality and Preference 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
15.10%
发文量
263
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.
期刊最新文献
Effects of personality traits and context congruency on participant engagement in traditional central location tests and congruent versus incongruent digital immersive environments during affective product testing Sweetening the experience: How designed immersive multisensory environments modify yogurt taste and mouthfeel perception A cross-cultural study on the consumer perception and acceptance of grass-derived ingredients in Denmark and Austria Awareness without action? Consumer perceptions and more plant-based eating trends over time (2021, 2022, 2024) in Denmark Testing symmetry in three-response 2AFC: implications for two-alternative choice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1