The impact of front-of-package design features on consumers' attention and selection likelihood of protein bars: An eye-tracking study

IF 4.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Food Quality and Preference Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-07 DOI:10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105427
Erin Applegate , Julia Carins , Lisa Vincze , Matthew Stainer , Christopher Irwin
{"title":"The impact of front-of-package design features on consumers' attention and selection likelihood of protein bars: An eye-tracking study","authors":"Erin Applegate ,&nbsp;Julia Carins ,&nbsp;Lisa Vincze ,&nbsp;Matthew Stainer ,&nbsp;Christopher Irwin","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The current regulatory framework permits sports food manufacturers to incorporate a variety of voluntary label claims/icons on the front-of-package (FoP) of their products. This study examined the influence of label design features relevant to protein bars on individuals' visual attention and selection likelihood. Eight experimental FoP labels were created, concentrating on three distinct features, each identified as an area of interest (AOI). These features were allocated in a dichotomous manner within a 2 <span><math><mo>×</mo></math></span> 2 <span><math><mo>×</mo></math></span> 2 design: AOI 1 = ‘high protein’ vs ‘sports bar’; AOI 2 = ‘10 g protein/serve’ vs ‘25 g protein/serve’; AOI 3 = ‘dietitian approved’ vs ‘sports celebrity’. Labels were presented in a semi-randomised order and viewed individually for 15 s by participants. Eye-tracking metrics included time to first fixation (TFF), total fixation duration (TFD), fixation count (FC), and visit count (VC). Selection likelihood ratings were captured using visual analogue scales (0–100 mm). Despite receiving the least amount of attention, protein content was most influential on participants' selection likelihood ratings. Participants were more likely to select products displaying ‘25 g protein/serve’ than ‘10 g protein/serve’. These results provide insight into FoP label elements that influence consumers' willingness to select protein bars and may help guide label design enhancements to attract consumer attention and better cater to their preferences.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"126 ","pages":"Article 105427"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329325000023","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current regulatory framework permits sports food manufacturers to incorporate a variety of voluntary label claims/icons on the front-of-package (FoP) of their products. This study examined the influence of label design features relevant to protein bars on individuals' visual attention and selection likelihood. Eight experimental FoP labels were created, concentrating on three distinct features, each identified as an area of interest (AOI). These features were allocated in a dichotomous manner within a 2 × 2 × 2 design: AOI 1 = ‘high protein’ vs ‘sports bar’; AOI 2 = ‘10 g protein/serve’ vs ‘25 g protein/serve’; AOI 3 = ‘dietitian approved’ vs ‘sports celebrity’. Labels were presented in a semi-randomised order and viewed individually for 15 s by participants. Eye-tracking metrics included time to first fixation (TFF), total fixation duration (TFD), fixation count (FC), and visit count (VC). Selection likelihood ratings were captured using visual analogue scales (0–100 mm). Despite receiving the least amount of attention, protein content was most influential on participants' selection likelihood ratings. Participants were more likely to select products displaying ‘25 g protein/serve’ than ‘10 g protein/serve’. These results provide insight into FoP label elements that influence consumers' willingness to select protein bars and may help guide label design enhancements to attract consumer attention and better cater to their preferences.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
蛋白棒包装正面设计特征对消费者注意力和选择可能性的影响:一项眼动追踪研究
目前的监管框架允许运动食品制造商在其产品的包装正面(FoP)上加入各种自愿标签声明/图标。本研究考察了与蛋白质棒相关的标签设计特征对个体视觉注意和选择可能性的影响。创建了8个实验性FoP标签,集中在三个不同的特征上,每个特征都被确定为一个兴趣区域(AOI)。这些特征在2 × 2 × 2设计中以二分法分配:AOI 1 =“高蛋白”vs“运动棒”;AOI 2 =“10克蛋白质/份”vs“25克蛋白质/份”;AOI 3 =“营养师认可”vs“运动名人”。标签以半随机顺序呈现,并由参与者单独观看15秒。眼动追踪指标包括首次注视时间(TFF)、总注视持续时间(TFD)、注视次数(FC)和访问次数(VC)。选择可能性评分采用视觉模拟量表(0-100毫米)。尽管受到的关注最少,但蛋白质含量对参与者的选择可能性评级影响最大。参与者更有可能选择“25克蛋白质/份”而不是“10克蛋白质/份”的产品。这些结果提供了对影响消费者选择蛋白质棒意愿的FoP标签元素的见解,并可能有助于指导标签设计的改进,以吸引消费者的注意,更好地迎合他们的喜好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Food Quality and Preference
Food Quality and Preference 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
15.10%
发文量
263
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.
期刊最新文献
The suppression of moral engagement in consumer responses to animal slaughter Polychrome versus monochrome Nutri-Score shelf labels: An eye-tracking study of consumer attention and choice Effects of adding plant-based menu options on meat selection frequency: A randomized controlled experiment Consumer preferences for simultaneous presentation of nutrition and environmental labelling: Evidence from a discrete choice experiment at UK scale Multidimensional drivers of texture preference: Integrating oral behavior, tactile acuity and thermal taster status
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1