Validation and cultural adaptation of the arabic version of the food disgust scale

IF 4.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Food Quality and Preference Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-04 DOI:10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105425
Salma A. Bekhit , Karima M. Fahim , Assem Gebreal , Zeinab F. Abdel-Fatah
{"title":"Validation and cultural adaptation of the arabic version of the food disgust scale","authors":"Salma A. Bekhit ,&nbsp;Karima M. Fahim ,&nbsp;Assem Gebreal ,&nbsp;Zeinab F. Abdel-Fatah","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Disgust is a culturally dependent phenomenon, and its linguistic expressions vary among communities. The Food Disgust Scale (FDS), in both long and short versions, was developed and validated by Hartmann and Siegrist (2018) in German and later adapted to other languages to measure food-related disgust. This study aimed to validate the FDS for the first time in Arabic. The FDS was translated into Arabic using forward and backward translation standards. Three studies were conducted via online surveys among adult Egyptians. The Arabic version of the FDS demonstrated excellent content validity (S-CVI = 0.91). In Study 1, exploratory factor analysis identified a seven-factor structure for the FDS long, consistent with the original scale, covering dimensions such as animal flesh, poor hygiene, human contamination, mold, decaying fruits and vegetables, fish, and living contaminants. These factors demonstrated high internal consistency, with Cronbach's alpha values ranging from 0.79 to 0.92. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the seven-factor model, showing a good fit to the data. The FDS short version had a Cronbach's alpha of 0.79, and three additional short version were developed by selecting items with the highest item-total correlations. In Study 2, convergent and discriminant validity were confirmed through significant correlations with the food neophobia scale. Study 3 demonstrated the scale's stability over time, with test-retest correlations for the subscales ranging from 0.61 to 0.81 and 0.62 for the short version, indicating high reliability. The validated Arabic long and short versions of FDS are reliable tools for assessing food disgust sensitivity among Arabic-speaking populations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"126 ","pages":"Article 105425"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329324003276","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Disgust is a culturally dependent phenomenon, and its linguistic expressions vary among communities. The Food Disgust Scale (FDS), in both long and short versions, was developed and validated by Hartmann and Siegrist (2018) in German and later adapted to other languages to measure food-related disgust. This study aimed to validate the FDS for the first time in Arabic. The FDS was translated into Arabic using forward and backward translation standards. Three studies were conducted via online surveys among adult Egyptians. The Arabic version of the FDS demonstrated excellent content validity (S-CVI = 0.91). In Study 1, exploratory factor analysis identified a seven-factor structure for the FDS long, consistent with the original scale, covering dimensions such as animal flesh, poor hygiene, human contamination, mold, decaying fruits and vegetables, fish, and living contaminants. These factors demonstrated high internal consistency, with Cronbach's alpha values ranging from 0.79 to 0.92. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the seven-factor model, showing a good fit to the data. The FDS short version had a Cronbach's alpha of 0.79, and three additional short version were developed by selecting items with the highest item-total correlations. In Study 2, convergent and discriminant validity were confirmed through significant correlations with the food neophobia scale. Study 3 demonstrated the scale's stability over time, with test-retest correlations for the subscales ranging from 0.61 to 0.81 and 0.62 for the short version, indicating high reliability. The validated Arabic long and short versions of FDS are reliable tools for assessing food disgust sensitivity among Arabic-speaking populations.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿拉伯版食物厌恶量表的验证与文化适应
厌恶是一种文化依赖现象,它的语言表达因群体而异。食物厌恶量表(FDS)有长版本和短版本,由Hartmann和Siegrist(2018)用德语开发和验证,后来被改编为其他语言来测量与食物相关的厌恶。本研究旨在首次在阿拉伯语中验证FDS。FDS使用正向和反向翻译标准被翻译成阿拉伯语。三项研究是通过在线调查在埃及成年人中进行的。阿拉伯语版FDS的内容效度很好(S-CVI = 0.91)。在研究1中,探索性因子分析发现了FDS长度的七因子结构,与原始尺度一致,涵盖了动物肉、卫生不良、人类污染、霉菌、腐烂的水果和蔬菜、鱼类和活污染物等维度。这些因素具有较高的内部一致性,Cronbach's alpha值在0.79 ~ 0.92之间。验证性因子分析支持七因子模型,显示出较好的拟合数据。FDS短版本的Cronbach's alpha值为0.79,并通过选择项目-总量相关性最高的项目开发了另外三个短版本。在研究2中,通过与新食物恐惧症量表的显著相关来验证收敛效度和判别效度。研究3证明了量表随时间的稳定性,子量表的重测相关系数在0.61 ~ 0.81之间,短版本的重测相关系数为0.62,表明了较高的信度。经过验证的阿拉伯语长、短版本的FDS是评估阿拉伯语人群食物厌恶敏感性的可靠工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Food Quality and Preference
Food Quality and Preference 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
15.10%
发文量
263
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.
期刊最新文献
Effects of personality traits and context congruency on participant engagement in traditional central location tests and congruent versus incongruent digital immersive environments during affective product testing Sweetening the experience: How designed immersive multisensory environments modify yogurt taste and mouthfeel perception A cross-cultural study on the consumer perception and acceptance of grass-derived ingredients in Denmark and Austria Awareness without action? Consumer perceptions and more plant-based eating trends over time (2021, 2022, 2024) in Denmark Testing symmetry in three-response 2AFC: implications for two-alternative choice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1