Salma A. Bekhit , Karima M. Fahim , Assem Gebreal , Zeinab F. Abdel-Fatah
{"title":"Validation and cultural adaptation of the arabic version of the food disgust scale","authors":"Salma A. Bekhit , Karima M. Fahim , Assem Gebreal , Zeinab F. Abdel-Fatah","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Disgust is a culturally dependent phenomenon, and its linguistic expressions vary among communities. The Food Disgust Scale (FDS), in both long and short versions, was developed and validated by Hartmann and Siegrist (2018) in German and later adapted to other languages to measure food-related disgust. This study aimed to validate the FDS for the first time in Arabic. The FDS was translated into Arabic using forward and backward translation standards. Three studies were conducted via online surveys among adult Egyptians. The Arabic version of the FDS demonstrated excellent content validity (S-CVI = 0.91). In Study 1, exploratory factor analysis identified a seven-factor structure for the FDS long, consistent with the original scale, covering dimensions such as animal flesh, poor hygiene, human contamination, mold, decaying fruits and vegetables, fish, and living contaminants. These factors demonstrated high internal consistency, with Cronbach's alpha values ranging from 0.79 to 0.92. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the seven-factor model, showing a good fit to the data. The FDS short version had a Cronbach's alpha of 0.79, and three additional short version were developed by selecting items with the highest item-total correlations. In Study 2, convergent and discriminant validity were confirmed through significant correlations with the food neophobia scale. Study 3 demonstrated the scale's stability over time, with test-retest correlations for the subscales ranging from 0.61 to 0.81 and 0.62 for the short version, indicating high reliability. The validated Arabic long and short versions of FDS are reliable tools for assessing food disgust sensitivity among Arabic-speaking populations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"126 ","pages":"Article 105425"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329324003276","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Disgust is a culturally dependent phenomenon, and its linguistic expressions vary among communities. The Food Disgust Scale (FDS), in both long and short versions, was developed and validated by Hartmann and Siegrist (2018) in German and later adapted to other languages to measure food-related disgust. This study aimed to validate the FDS for the first time in Arabic. The FDS was translated into Arabic using forward and backward translation standards. Three studies were conducted via online surveys among adult Egyptians. The Arabic version of the FDS demonstrated excellent content validity (S-CVI = 0.91). In Study 1, exploratory factor analysis identified a seven-factor structure for the FDS long, consistent with the original scale, covering dimensions such as animal flesh, poor hygiene, human contamination, mold, decaying fruits and vegetables, fish, and living contaminants. These factors demonstrated high internal consistency, with Cronbach's alpha values ranging from 0.79 to 0.92. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the seven-factor model, showing a good fit to the data. The FDS short version had a Cronbach's alpha of 0.79, and three additional short version were developed by selecting items with the highest item-total correlations. In Study 2, convergent and discriminant validity were confirmed through significant correlations with the food neophobia scale. Study 3 demonstrated the scale's stability over time, with test-retest correlations for the subscales ranging from 0.61 to 0.81 and 0.62 for the short version, indicating high reliability. The validated Arabic long and short versions of FDS are reliable tools for assessing food disgust sensitivity among Arabic-speaking populations.
期刊介绍:
Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.