Assessing long short-term memory network significant wave height forecast efficacy in the Caribbean Sea and Northwestern Atlantic Ocean

IF 5.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Ocean Engineering Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-10 DOI:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.120045
Brandon J. Bethel , Changming Dong , Shuyi Zhou , Wenjin Sun , Yilin Bao
{"title":"Assessing long short-term memory network significant wave height forecast efficacy in the Caribbean Sea and Northwestern Atlantic Ocean","authors":"Brandon J. Bethel ,&nbsp;Changming Dong ,&nbsp;Shuyi Zhou ,&nbsp;Wenjin Sun ,&nbsp;Yilin Bao","doi":"10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.120045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Precise wave forecasts are crucial, but few studies have directly tested artificial intelligence forecast efficacies in different wave regimes. Using ten years of buoy observations and Simulating WAves Nearshore (SWAN) simulations, the wave climates of the Caribbean Sea (CS) and Northwestern Atlantic Ocean (NWAO) are studied from 2010 to 2019. SWAN simulations are used to replace fragmentary buoy observations and then forecasting using the Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network is initiated on six sites throughout the CS and NWAO. Although expected, results illustrate that regardless of test site, LSTM forecasts were highly accurate, reaching correlation values of &gt;0.8, root-mean-square errors &lt;0.4 m, and mean average percentage errors of &lt;14% up to 12-hr forecast horizons. Location-specific geographic and metocean attributes led to divergent forecast outcomes between test sites. Forecast correlations were higher near, but not directly under the Caribbean Low-Level Jet, leading to the best forecast results in the western CS, followed by the central CS, and was poorest in the NWAO. It was conclusively determined NWAO and CS wave fields are sufficiently different to ensure that forecasting using information from either subregion on its counterpart would lead to low correlations and unacceptably high levels of error.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19403,"journal":{"name":"Ocean Engineering","volume":"317 ","pages":"Article 120045"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocean Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029801824033833","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Precise wave forecasts are crucial, but few studies have directly tested artificial intelligence forecast efficacies in different wave regimes. Using ten years of buoy observations and Simulating WAves Nearshore (SWAN) simulations, the wave climates of the Caribbean Sea (CS) and Northwestern Atlantic Ocean (NWAO) are studied from 2010 to 2019. SWAN simulations are used to replace fragmentary buoy observations and then forecasting using the Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network is initiated on six sites throughout the CS and NWAO. Although expected, results illustrate that regardless of test site, LSTM forecasts were highly accurate, reaching correlation values of >0.8, root-mean-square errors <0.4 m, and mean average percentage errors of <14% up to 12-hr forecast horizons. Location-specific geographic and metocean attributes led to divergent forecast outcomes between test sites. Forecast correlations were higher near, but not directly under the Caribbean Low-Level Jet, leading to the best forecast results in the western CS, followed by the central CS, and was poorest in the NWAO. It was conclusively determined NWAO and CS wave fields are sufficiently different to ensure that forecasting using information from either subregion on its counterpart would lead to low correlations and unacceptably high levels of error.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估长短期记忆网络在加勒比海和西北大西洋的显著波高预报效能
精确的海浪预报至关重要,但很少有研究直接测试人工智能在不同海浪状态下的预报效果。利用近十年的浮标观测和模拟近岸波浪(SWAN)模拟,对2010 - 2019年加勒比海(CS)和西北大西洋(NWAO)的波浪气候进行了研究。SWAN模拟用来代替零碎的浮标观测,然后利用长短期记忆(LSTM)网络在整个CS和NWAO的六个站点启动预测。尽管是预期的,但结果表明,无论测试地点如何,LSTM预测都非常准确,在12小时的预测范围内,LSTM预测的相关值为>;0.8,均方根误差<;0.4 m,平均百分比误差<;14%。特定地点的地理和海洋属性导致测试地点之间的预测结果不同。预报相关性在加勒比海低空急流附近较高,但在低空急流正下方较低,因此预报效果最好的是加勒比海西部,其次是加勒比海中部,而西北太平洋低空急流的预报效果最差。最后确定的是,NWAO和CS波场有足够的不同,以确保使用来自任何一个次区域的资料对其对应区域进行预报将导致低相关性和不可接受的高误差水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ocean Engineering
Ocean Engineering 工程技术-工程:大洋
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
34.00%
发文量
2379
审稿时长
8.1 months
期刊介绍: Ocean Engineering provides a medium for the publication of original research and development work in the field of ocean engineering. Ocean Engineering seeks papers in the following topics.
期刊最新文献
Bi-objective fuzzy batch scheduling for resource-constrained ship pipe hybrid flow shops: An enhanced hyper-heuristic algorithm Seafarer fatigue identification based on multimodal data fusion Investigation on the water entry characteristics of an open cylindrical cavity in regular waves Stabilization of a nonlinear pitch-roll ship model via NVFBD control: Analytical and numerical investigations Influence of bow configuration on brash ice resistance: Comparison of invisible and conventional bulbous bows
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1