Comparative study on setup accuracy of marker-less surface-guided radiation therapy versus traditional skin marks in hypofractionated whole breast irradiation: A marker-free approach starting from CT simulation

IF 2.5 4区 综合性期刊 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1016/j.jrras.2025.101290
Yuri Jeong , Jung Hoon Kim , Jeong Geun Oh , Kang Kyoo Lee , Sun Rock Moon
{"title":"Comparative study on setup accuracy of marker-less surface-guided radiation therapy versus traditional skin marks in hypofractionated whole breast irradiation: A marker-free approach starting from CT simulation","authors":"Yuri Jeong ,&nbsp;Jung Hoon Kim ,&nbsp;Jeong Geun Oh ,&nbsp;Kang Kyoo Lee ,&nbsp;Sun Rock Moon","doi":"10.1016/j.jrras.2025.101290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><div>To evaluate the setup accuracy of surface-guided radiation therapy (SGRT) compared with traditional skin marks in patients undergoing hypofractionated whole breast irradiation, with a specific focus on our institution's practice of full eliminating skin marks from the computed tomography (CT) simulation.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><div>We retrospectively reviewed 184 breast cancer patients treated with hypofractionated whole breast irradiation between January 2022 and May 2023. Initial patient positioning was performed using either traditional skin marks (n = 93, 1488 sessions) or surface-guidance technology via AlignRT (n = 91, 1456 sessions). The setup accuracy was evaluated by analyzing translational couch shifts in vertical, longitudinal, and lateral directions through daily verification using orthogonal kV images in anterior-posterior and lateral directions obtained after initial positioning. The time from initial patient positioning to treatment was also compared.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The average translational couch shifts after initial positioning with skin marks were 3.2 ± 1.8 mm, 3.3 ± 1.5 mm, and 2.8 ± 1.4 mm in the vertical, longitudinal, and lateral directions, respectively. For SGRT, the average translational couch shifts were 3.5 ± 1.5 mm, 3.3 ± 1.4 mm, and 2.8 ± 1.2 mm, respectively. There were no significant differences between SGRT and skin marks in any direction. The average time from initial patient positioning to treatment was shorter in patients with SGRT compared to those with skin marks, 261 s vs. 281 s.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The elimination of skin marks from the CT simulation stage, facilitated by SGRT, resulted in comparable setup accuracy with traditional skin marks. In addition, SGRT significantly reduced the time from initial patient positioning to treatment, suggesting that SGRT can be effectively used in hypofractionated whole breast irradiation without the need for skin marks, potentially enhancing patient comfort and convenience.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16920,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences","volume":"18 1","pages":"Article 101290"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1687850725000020","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose

To evaluate the setup accuracy of surface-guided radiation therapy (SGRT) compared with traditional skin marks in patients undergoing hypofractionated whole breast irradiation, with a specific focus on our institution's practice of full eliminating skin marks from the computed tomography (CT) simulation.

Patients and methods

We retrospectively reviewed 184 breast cancer patients treated with hypofractionated whole breast irradiation between January 2022 and May 2023. Initial patient positioning was performed using either traditional skin marks (n = 93, 1488 sessions) or surface-guidance technology via AlignRT (n = 91, 1456 sessions). The setup accuracy was evaluated by analyzing translational couch shifts in vertical, longitudinal, and lateral directions through daily verification using orthogonal kV images in anterior-posterior and lateral directions obtained after initial positioning. The time from initial patient positioning to treatment was also compared.

Results

The average translational couch shifts after initial positioning with skin marks were 3.2 ± 1.8 mm, 3.3 ± 1.5 mm, and 2.8 ± 1.4 mm in the vertical, longitudinal, and lateral directions, respectively. For SGRT, the average translational couch shifts were 3.5 ± 1.5 mm, 3.3 ± 1.4 mm, and 2.8 ± 1.2 mm, respectively. There were no significant differences between SGRT and skin marks in any direction. The average time from initial patient positioning to treatment was shorter in patients with SGRT compared to those with skin marks, 261 s vs. 281 s.

Conclusions

The elimination of skin marks from the CT simulation stage, facilitated by SGRT, resulted in comparable setup accuracy with traditional skin marks. In addition, SGRT significantly reduced the time from initial patient positioning to treatment, suggesting that SGRT can be effectively used in hypofractionated whole breast irradiation without the need for skin marks, potentially enhancing patient comfort and convenience.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
低分割全乳照射中无标记表面引导放射治疗与传统皮肤标记设置准确性的比较研究:从CT模拟开始的无标记方法
背景与目的评价表面引导放射治疗(SGRT)与传统皮肤印记在接受低分割全乳照射患者中的设置准确性,并特别关注我院在计算机断层扫描(CT)模拟中完全消除皮肤印记的做法。患者和方法我们回顾性分析了2022年1月至2023年5月期间接受低分割全乳照射治疗的184例乳腺癌患者。采用传统皮肤标记(n = 93,1488次)或AlignRT表面引导技术(n = 91,1456次)进行初始患者定位。通过使用初始定位后获得的前后方向和侧方向正交kV图像进行日常验证,通过分析垂直、纵向和横向的平移沙发位移来评估设置精度。从患者初始定位到治疗时间也进行了比较。结果首次定位后带皮痕的平均平移位移分别为纵向、纵向和横向3.2±1.8 mm、3.3±1.5 mm和2.8±1.4 mm。SGRT的平均平移位移分别为3.5±1.5 mm、3.3±1.4 mm和2.8±1.2 mm。SGRT与皮痕在任何方向上均无显著差异。与有皮肤印记的患者相比,SGRT患者从初始患者体位到治疗的平均时间更短,261秒比281秒。结论在SGRT的帮助下,从CT模拟阶段消除皮肤印记,与传统皮肤印记的设置精度相当。此外,SGRT显著缩短了患者从初始体位到治疗的时间,这表明SGRT可以有效地用于低分割全乳照射,而不需要皮肤标记,可能提高患者的舒适度和便利性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
5.90%
发文量
130
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences provides a high quality medium for the publication of substantial, original and scientific and technological papers on the development and applications of nuclear, radiation and isotopes in biology, medicine, drugs, biochemistry, microbiology, agriculture, entomology, food technology, chemistry, physics, solid states, engineering, environmental and applied sciences.
期刊最新文献
Shugananshen recipe improves insomnia in humans and alleviates anxiety in rats by altering expressions of key signaling molecules Knowledge and awareness of ionizing radiation hazards in diagnostic imaging among patients at King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia The role of AKR1C3 in regulating chondrocyte aging in knee osteoarthritis AI-enhanced analytical and numerical solutions for fractional cancer tumor models in older adults using healthcare technologies Danshou Tang alleviates mitochondrial oxidative stress and modulates apoptosis to improve recurrent spontaneous abortion outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1