Comparative study on setup accuracy of marker-less surface-guided radiation therapy versus traditional skin marks in hypofractionated whole breast irradiation: A marker-free approach starting from CT simulation
Yuri Jeong , Jung Hoon Kim , Jeong Geun Oh , Kang Kyoo Lee , Sun Rock Moon
{"title":"Comparative study on setup accuracy of marker-less surface-guided radiation therapy versus traditional skin marks in hypofractionated whole breast irradiation: A marker-free approach starting from CT simulation","authors":"Yuri Jeong , Jung Hoon Kim , Jeong Geun Oh , Kang Kyoo Lee , Sun Rock Moon","doi":"10.1016/j.jrras.2025.101290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><div>To evaluate the setup accuracy of surface-guided radiation therapy (SGRT) compared with traditional skin marks in patients undergoing hypofractionated whole breast irradiation, with a specific focus on our institution's practice of full eliminating skin marks from the computed tomography (CT) simulation.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><div>We retrospectively reviewed 184 breast cancer patients treated with hypofractionated whole breast irradiation between January 2022 and May 2023. Initial patient positioning was performed using either traditional skin marks (n = 93, 1488 sessions) or surface-guidance technology via AlignRT (n = 91, 1456 sessions). The setup accuracy was evaluated by analyzing translational couch shifts in vertical, longitudinal, and lateral directions through daily verification using orthogonal kV images in anterior-posterior and lateral directions obtained after initial positioning. The time from initial patient positioning to treatment was also compared.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The average translational couch shifts after initial positioning with skin marks were 3.2 ± 1.8 mm, 3.3 ± 1.5 mm, and 2.8 ± 1.4 mm in the vertical, longitudinal, and lateral directions, respectively. For SGRT, the average translational couch shifts were 3.5 ± 1.5 mm, 3.3 ± 1.4 mm, and 2.8 ± 1.2 mm, respectively. There were no significant differences between SGRT and skin marks in any direction. The average time from initial patient positioning to treatment was shorter in patients with SGRT compared to those with skin marks, 261 s vs. 281 s.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The elimination of skin marks from the CT simulation stage, facilitated by SGRT, resulted in comparable setup accuracy with traditional skin marks. In addition, SGRT significantly reduced the time from initial patient positioning to treatment, suggesting that SGRT can be effectively used in hypofractionated whole breast irradiation without the need for skin marks, potentially enhancing patient comfort and convenience.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16920,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences","volume":"18 1","pages":"Article 101290"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1687850725000020","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and purpose
To evaluate the setup accuracy of surface-guided radiation therapy (SGRT) compared with traditional skin marks in patients undergoing hypofractionated whole breast irradiation, with a specific focus on our institution's practice of full eliminating skin marks from the computed tomography (CT) simulation.
Patients and methods
We retrospectively reviewed 184 breast cancer patients treated with hypofractionated whole breast irradiation between January 2022 and May 2023. Initial patient positioning was performed using either traditional skin marks (n = 93, 1488 sessions) or surface-guidance technology via AlignRT (n = 91, 1456 sessions). The setup accuracy was evaluated by analyzing translational couch shifts in vertical, longitudinal, and lateral directions through daily verification using orthogonal kV images in anterior-posterior and lateral directions obtained after initial positioning. The time from initial patient positioning to treatment was also compared.
Results
The average translational couch shifts after initial positioning with skin marks were 3.2 ± 1.8 mm, 3.3 ± 1.5 mm, and 2.8 ± 1.4 mm in the vertical, longitudinal, and lateral directions, respectively. For SGRT, the average translational couch shifts were 3.5 ± 1.5 mm, 3.3 ± 1.4 mm, and 2.8 ± 1.2 mm, respectively. There were no significant differences between SGRT and skin marks in any direction. The average time from initial patient positioning to treatment was shorter in patients with SGRT compared to those with skin marks, 261 s vs. 281 s.
Conclusions
The elimination of skin marks from the CT simulation stage, facilitated by SGRT, resulted in comparable setup accuracy with traditional skin marks. In addition, SGRT significantly reduced the time from initial patient positioning to treatment, suggesting that SGRT can be effectively used in hypofractionated whole breast irradiation without the need for skin marks, potentially enhancing patient comfort and convenience.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences provides a high quality medium for the publication of substantial, original and scientific and technological papers on the development and applications of nuclear, radiation and isotopes in biology, medicine, drugs, biochemistry, microbiology, agriculture, entomology, food technology, chemistry, physics, solid states, engineering, environmental and applied sciences.