The impact of rare and common species on the functional diversity of forest birds in a palm-dominated landscape in the Eastern Amazon

IF 1.3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY Acta Oecologica-International Journal of Ecology Pub Date : 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1016/j.actao.2025.104060
Beatriz Tavares Pinheiro , Sara Miranda Almeida , Marcos Pérsio Dantas Santos
{"title":"The impact of rare and common species on the functional diversity of forest birds in a palm-dominated landscape in the Eastern Amazon","authors":"Beatriz Tavares Pinheiro ,&nbsp;Sara Miranda Almeida ,&nbsp;Marcos Pérsio Dantas Santos","doi":"10.1016/j.actao.2025.104060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The advance of industrial agriculture in the Amazon is a major threat to biodiversity. It is causing intense deforestation to make way for cattle ranching and monocultures such as oil palm. Forest loss can alter the distribution and population size of rare species, which are often limited in number or range, affecting the functional structure of communities and the ecosystem services they provide. Here, we assessed the contribution of rare and common species to the functional diversity of forest bird communities in a landscape dominated by oil palm plantations. We sampled birds in plantations and forest fragments in the eastern Amazon, Brazil. A total of 232 bird species were recorded, 198 in the fragments and 53 in the plantations. We calculated a rarity index for each species occurring in forest fragments, combining local abundance, geographic range, and habitat specificity. We calculated functional richness (FRic), functional originality (FOri), functional specialization (FSpe), and community-weighted trait means (CWM), and then compared these metrics between forest and plantation communities across three scenarios: 1) total species <em>pool</em> recorded in forest <em>versus</em> plantation, 2) removal of the rarest species, and 3) removal of common species. Removal of rare species increased functional diversity but decreased functional redundancy. Conversely, removal of common species decreased FOri and FSpe values, demonstrating that common forest bird species make unique functional contributions. We conclude that the loss of both rare and common species affects forest bird communities. Therefore, conservation and protection of forested areas is essential to ensure ecosystem health and resilience.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55564,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oecologica-International Journal of Ecology","volume":"126 ","pages":"Article 104060"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oecologica-International Journal of Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1146609X25000049","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The advance of industrial agriculture in the Amazon is a major threat to biodiversity. It is causing intense deforestation to make way for cattle ranching and monocultures such as oil palm. Forest loss can alter the distribution and population size of rare species, which are often limited in number or range, affecting the functional structure of communities and the ecosystem services they provide. Here, we assessed the contribution of rare and common species to the functional diversity of forest bird communities in a landscape dominated by oil palm plantations. We sampled birds in plantations and forest fragments in the eastern Amazon, Brazil. A total of 232 bird species were recorded, 198 in the fragments and 53 in the plantations. We calculated a rarity index for each species occurring in forest fragments, combining local abundance, geographic range, and habitat specificity. We calculated functional richness (FRic), functional originality (FOri), functional specialization (FSpe), and community-weighted trait means (CWM), and then compared these metrics between forest and plantation communities across three scenarios: 1) total species pool recorded in forest versus plantation, 2) removal of the rarest species, and 3) removal of common species. Removal of rare species increased functional diversity but decreased functional redundancy. Conversely, removal of common species decreased FOri and FSpe values, demonstrating that common forest bird species make unique functional contributions. We conclude that the loss of both rare and common species affects forest bird communities. Therefore, conservation and protection of forested areas is essential to ensure ecosystem health and resilience.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
57
审稿时长
>0 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Oecologica is venue for the publication of original research articles in ecology. We encourage studies in all areas of ecology, including ecosystem ecology, community ecology, population ecology, conservation ecology and evolutionary ecology. There is no bias with respect to taxon, biome or geographic area. Both theoretical and empirical papers are welcome, but combinations are particularly sought. Priority is given to papers based on explicitly stated hypotheses. Acta Oecologica also accepts review papers.
期刊最新文献
Taxonomic identity, but not evolutionary relatedness, determines the carbon stock and uptake of tropical forests trees Warming climate impacts on elevational shifts in expansive native synanthropic plants along the roads: Examples of four species Composition of breeding bird communities under different intensities of human activity: A case study in Jiulingshan Nature Reserve in eastern China Natural restoration has better soil acid phosphatase kinetics than artificial plantations Woody biomass-carbon and soil organic carbon stock in subtropical forests of Garhwal Himalaya
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1