{"title":"Understanding the variability of residential energy poverty in India","authors":"Biswajit Tikadar, Deepika Swami","doi":"10.1016/j.jup.2024.101878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Residential energy poverty is the lack of accessible, reliable, clean energy services. Researchers have not reached a consensus about defining and measuring energy poverty, leading to ineffective energy-related policy formulation. Existing approaches simplify energy poverty to a \"yes-no\" approach, neglecting its multidimensional nature. The subjective parameters and thresholds used further introduce uncertainty and bias. We addressed this gap by formulating a comprehensive Residential Energy Poverty Index (REPI) for Indian states by adopting a multidimensional approach, including clean and green energy, energy efficiency, accessibility and reliability, and appliances. The current approach focuses on energy availability beyond basic needs and should look at the broader dimensions of quality of life, socioeconomic well-being, education, and environmental sustainability. The work is based on the Indian residential energy survey conducted by CEEW, which included 14,850 households across 21 Indian states. REPI was constructed by assigning weightage to different variables across four dimensions using Principal Component Analysis. Multiple Linear Regression was utilized to identify the socioeconomic factors impacting REPI.</div><div>Findings reveal that enhancing energy efficiency and decentralized solar power, particularly in states like Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand, can significantly improve energy access and reliability. Factors such as primary education and female-headed households correlate with lower energy poverty, while poor housing, rural areas, marginal groups, and primary economic activities like agriculture correlate with higher energy poverty. The findings highlight the importance of tailored state-specific policies like decentralized renewable energy, energy cleanliness and awareness campaigns to address residential energy poverty in India.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23554,"journal":{"name":"Utilities Policy","volume":"93 ","pages":"Article 101878"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Utilities Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178724001723","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Residential energy poverty is the lack of accessible, reliable, clean energy services. Researchers have not reached a consensus about defining and measuring energy poverty, leading to ineffective energy-related policy formulation. Existing approaches simplify energy poverty to a "yes-no" approach, neglecting its multidimensional nature. The subjective parameters and thresholds used further introduce uncertainty and bias. We addressed this gap by formulating a comprehensive Residential Energy Poverty Index (REPI) for Indian states by adopting a multidimensional approach, including clean and green energy, energy efficiency, accessibility and reliability, and appliances. The current approach focuses on energy availability beyond basic needs and should look at the broader dimensions of quality of life, socioeconomic well-being, education, and environmental sustainability. The work is based on the Indian residential energy survey conducted by CEEW, which included 14,850 households across 21 Indian states. REPI was constructed by assigning weightage to different variables across four dimensions using Principal Component Analysis. Multiple Linear Regression was utilized to identify the socioeconomic factors impacting REPI.
Findings reveal that enhancing energy efficiency and decentralized solar power, particularly in states like Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand, can significantly improve energy access and reliability. Factors such as primary education and female-headed households correlate with lower energy poverty, while poor housing, rural areas, marginal groups, and primary economic activities like agriculture correlate with higher energy poverty. The findings highlight the importance of tailored state-specific policies like decentralized renewable energy, energy cleanliness and awareness campaigns to address residential energy poverty in India.
期刊介绍:
Utilities Policy is deliberately international, interdisciplinary, and intersectoral. Articles address utility trends and issues in both developed and developing economies. Authors and reviewers come from various disciplines, including economics, political science, sociology, law, finance, accounting, management, and engineering. Areas of focus include the utility and network industries providing essential electricity, natural gas, water and wastewater, solid waste, communications, broadband, postal, and public transportation services.
Utilities Policy invites submissions that apply various quantitative and qualitative methods. Contributions are welcome from both established and emerging scholars as well as accomplished practitioners. Interdisciplinary, comparative, and applied works are encouraged. Submissions to the journal should have a clear focus on governance, performance, and/or analysis of public utilities with an aim toward informing the policymaking process and providing recommendations as appropriate. Relevant topics and issues include but are not limited to industry structures and ownership, market design and dynamics, economic development, resource planning, system modeling, accounting and finance, infrastructure investment, supply and demand efficiency, strategic management and productivity, network operations and integration, supply chains, adaptation and flexibility, service-quality standards, benchmarking and metrics, benefit-cost analysis, behavior and incentives, pricing and demand response, economic and environmental regulation, regulatory performance and impact, restructuring and deregulation, and policy institutions.