A scoping review of Indigenous Cultural Mapping of coastal, island, and marine environments

IF 5.2 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Science & Policy Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1016/j.envsci.2025.103991
Redbird Ferguson , Karen E. Joyce , Christian Reepmeyer , Rachel Groom , Kellie Pollard
{"title":"A scoping review of Indigenous Cultural Mapping of coastal, island, and marine environments","authors":"Redbird Ferguson ,&nbsp;Karen E. Joyce ,&nbsp;Christian Reepmeyer ,&nbsp;Rachel Groom ,&nbsp;Kellie Pollard","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.103991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Indigenous Cultural Mapping (ICM) has the capacity to contribute to sustainably managing Sea Country. While there is a growing community of practice using ICM of marine, island, and coastal areas to incorporate Indigenous knowledge and cultural values into sustainability and conservation efforts, the literature is widely dispersed, and the method is not clearly defined or described. This scoping review evaluates the breadth and depth of practice undertaking ICM in island, coastal, and marine areas as captured within the English language scientific and grey literature. The objectives of this review were: 1) to determine the extent to which ICM is used a tool to manage Sea Country; 2) to evaluate the methods used throughout the process of ICM; and 3) to assess the studies against Arnstein’s (1969) ladder of participation. We used the Population Concept Context framework, searched Scopus, Web of Science, and Informit databases and Google Scholar, and identified studies that mapped Indigenous culture and/or cultural values in Sea Country. We included 54 studies that used ICM methods and were focused on Sea Country. These studies contribute to a growing body of work that demonstrates the value Indigenous knowledge adds to the sustainability of Sea Country now and into the future. High-level power-sharing and partnership throughout the research process is critically important. However, a lack of consistent standards of practice perpetuates research practices that exclude Indigenous communities from the research cycle. This limits the ability of ICM to improve sustainable practices that conserve and protect Sea Country.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"164 ","pages":"Article 103991"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901125000073","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Indigenous Cultural Mapping (ICM) has the capacity to contribute to sustainably managing Sea Country. While there is a growing community of practice using ICM of marine, island, and coastal areas to incorporate Indigenous knowledge and cultural values into sustainability and conservation efforts, the literature is widely dispersed, and the method is not clearly defined or described. This scoping review evaluates the breadth and depth of practice undertaking ICM in island, coastal, and marine areas as captured within the English language scientific and grey literature. The objectives of this review were: 1) to determine the extent to which ICM is used a tool to manage Sea Country; 2) to evaluate the methods used throughout the process of ICM; and 3) to assess the studies against Arnstein’s (1969) ladder of participation. We used the Population Concept Context framework, searched Scopus, Web of Science, and Informit databases and Google Scholar, and identified studies that mapped Indigenous culture and/or cultural values in Sea Country. We included 54 studies that used ICM methods and were focused on Sea Country. These studies contribute to a growing body of work that demonstrates the value Indigenous knowledge adds to the sustainability of Sea Country now and into the future. High-level power-sharing and partnership throughout the research process is critically important. However, a lack of consistent standards of practice perpetuates research practices that exclude Indigenous communities from the research cycle. This limits the ability of ICM to improve sustainable practices that conserve and protect Sea Country.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
沿海、岛屿和海洋环境土著文化制图的范围综述
土著文化测绘(ICM)有能力为海洋国家的可持续管理作出贡献。虽然越来越多的人在海洋、岛屿和沿海地区使用ICM,将土著知识和文化价值纳入可持续性和保护工作,但文献广泛分散,方法没有明确定义或描述。本综述评估了英语科学文献和灰色文献中在岛屿、沿海和海洋地区开展ICM的实践的广度和深度。本次审查的目标是:1)确定ICM在多大程度上被用作管理海洋国家的工具;2)评价ICM整个过程中使用的方法;3)对Arnstein(1969)参与阶梯理论的研究进行评价。我们使用人口概念上下文框架,检索了Scopus、Web of Science和Informit数据库以及b谷歌Scholar,并确定了绘制海洋国家土著文化和/或文化价值的研究。我们纳入了54项使用ICM方法的研究,重点是Sea Country。这些研究为越来越多的工作做出了贡献,证明了土著知识对海洋国家现在和未来的可持续性的价值。在整个研究过程中,高层权力分享和伙伴关系至关重要。然而,缺乏一致的实践标准使将土著社区排除在研究周期之外的研究实践永久化。这限制了ICM改善可持续做法以保护海洋国家的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Science & Policy
Environmental Science & Policy 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
332
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Policy promotes communication among government, business and industry, academia, and non-governmental organisations who are instrumental in the solution of environmental problems. It also seeks to advance interdisciplinary research of policy relevance on environmental issues such as climate change, biodiversity, environmental pollution and wastes, renewable and non-renewable natural resources, sustainability, and the interactions among these issues. The journal emphasises the linkages between these environmental issues and social and economic issues such as production, transport, consumption, growth, demographic changes, well-being, and health. However, the subject coverage will not be restricted to these issues and the introduction of new dimensions will be encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Decolonising hydrology: Reflecting on positionalities for sustainable and just futures A subnational social vulnerability index for use in drought decision support systems Tides of tension: Exploring the blue economy through stakeholder narrations Bridging waters and power: Hydrosocial territories with socio-natural resilience in China's Great Yangtze River protection programme The Global Framework for Climate Services: An ‘imaginary’ of climate services shaping practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1