History, engagement, and visibility of Indigenous Peoples in urban forest management plans from Canada and the United States

IF 5.2 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Science & Policy Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-03 DOI:10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104026
Alexander J.F. Martin , Emma S. Bacon , Niigani Migizikwe Jenna V.L. Valiquette , Serena Soucy , Amber Grant , Tenley M. Conway
{"title":"History, engagement, and visibility of Indigenous Peoples in urban forest management plans from Canada and the United States","authors":"Alexander J.F. Martin ,&nbsp;Emma S. Bacon ,&nbsp;Niigani Migizikwe Jenna V.L. Valiquette ,&nbsp;Serena Soucy ,&nbsp;Amber Grant ,&nbsp;Tenley M. Conway","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Environmental justice in urban forestry is concerned with recognizing and centering the needs of under-engaged communities in planning and decision-making processes. To examine the engagement and visibility of Indigenous Peoples in urban forestry, this study reviewed 181 urban forest management plans (UFMPs) from Canada and the United States. Themes pertaining to Indigenous Peoples were found in only 16 Canadian (22 %) and 27 US (25 %) UFMPs. The most common reference to Indigeneity in the UFMPs briefly referred to the pre-European history of the region, often omitting how settler-colonialism impacted the socio-ecological landscape. Only three UFMPs included a land acknowledgement, despite all cities being located on traditional territory of Indigenous Peoples. Even with a focus on the socio-ecological benefits of urban trees throughout the UFMPs, few referenced socio-cultural and provisioning benefits for Indigenous Peoples specifically. On-going Indigenous engagement was only discussed in one UFMP, although five acknowledged Indigenous engagement in creating the UFMP and eight mentioned plans for long-term engagement. Reconciliation was described in three UFMPs, with one Canadian UFMP referencing the Truth and Reconciliation Commission’s Calls to Action. Given the deep cultural connection that Indigenous communities share with the environment, the impacts of settler colonialism, and the underrepresentation of reconciliation and decolonization principles with urban environmental planning, it is imperative that Indigenous Peoples be recognized and centered within urban forest planning and decision-making. Supporting engagement and co-governance with Indigenous Peoples acknowledges their rights, traditional ways of knowing, promotes recognitional justice, and helps to foster a more sustainable and just urban future.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"166 ","pages":"Article 104026"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901125000425","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Environmental justice in urban forestry is concerned with recognizing and centering the needs of under-engaged communities in planning and decision-making processes. To examine the engagement and visibility of Indigenous Peoples in urban forestry, this study reviewed 181 urban forest management plans (UFMPs) from Canada and the United States. Themes pertaining to Indigenous Peoples were found in only 16 Canadian (22 %) and 27 US (25 %) UFMPs. The most common reference to Indigeneity in the UFMPs briefly referred to the pre-European history of the region, often omitting how settler-colonialism impacted the socio-ecological landscape. Only three UFMPs included a land acknowledgement, despite all cities being located on traditional territory of Indigenous Peoples. Even with a focus on the socio-ecological benefits of urban trees throughout the UFMPs, few referenced socio-cultural and provisioning benefits for Indigenous Peoples specifically. On-going Indigenous engagement was only discussed in one UFMP, although five acknowledged Indigenous engagement in creating the UFMP and eight mentioned plans for long-term engagement. Reconciliation was described in three UFMPs, with one Canadian UFMP referencing the Truth and Reconciliation Commission’s Calls to Action. Given the deep cultural connection that Indigenous communities share with the environment, the impacts of settler colonialism, and the underrepresentation of reconciliation and decolonization principles with urban environmental planning, it is imperative that Indigenous Peoples be recognized and centered within urban forest planning and decision-making. Supporting engagement and co-governance with Indigenous Peoples acknowledges their rights, traditional ways of knowing, promotes recognitional justice, and helps to foster a more sustainable and just urban future.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加拿大和美国城市森林管理计划中原住民的历史、参与和可见度
城市林业的环境正义涉及认识到参与不足的社区在规划和决策过程中的需要并使其成为中心。为了审查土著人民在城市林业中的参与和可见度,本研究审查了来自加拿大和美国的181个城市森林管理计划。与土著人民有关的主题仅在16个加拿大(22% %)和27个美国(25% %)ufmp中被发现。在ufmp中,最常见的关于土著的内容简要地提到了该地区的前欧洲历史,往往忽略了定居者殖民主义对社会生态景观的影响。尽管所有城市都位于土著人民的传统领土上,但只有三个ufmp包括土地承认。即使重点关注整个UFMPs的城市树木的社会生态效益,也很少具体提到土著人民的社会文化和供应效益。尽管5个国家承认土著参与了建立UFMP, 8个国家提到了长期参与的计划,但只有一个UFMP讨论了正在进行的土著参与。三个UFMP中描述了和解,其中一个加拿大UFMP引用了真相与和解委员会的行动呼吁。鉴于土著社区与环境有着深厚的文化联系,定居者殖民主义的影响,以及和解与非殖民化原则在城市环境规划中的代表性不足,必须承认土著人民并将其置于城市森林规划和决策的中心。支持与土著人民的接触和共同治理,承认他们的权利和传统的认识方式,促进公认的正义,并有助于建立一个更加可持续和公正的城市未来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Science & Policy
Environmental Science & Policy 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
332
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Policy promotes communication among government, business and industry, academia, and non-governmental organisations who are instrumental in the solution of environmental problems. It also seeks to advance interdisciplinary research of policy relevance on environmental issues such as climate change, biodiversity, environmental pollution and wastes, renewable and non-renewable natural resources, sustainability, and the interactions among these issues. The journal emphasises the linkages between these environmental issues and social and economic issues such as production, transport, consumption, growth, demographic changes, well-being, and health. However, the subject coverage will not be restricted to these issues and the introduction of new dimensions will be encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Decolonising hydrology: Reflecting on positionalities for sustainable and just futures A subnational social vulnerability index for use in drought decision support systems Tides of tension: Exploring the blue economy through stakeholder narrations Bridging waters and power: Hydrosocial territories with socio-natural resilience in China's Great Yangtze River protection programme The Global Framework for Climate Services: An ‘imaginary’ of climate services shaping practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1