The urban spatial change hypothesis revisited: A case study of Shanghai

IF 6 1区 经济学 Q1 URBAN STUDIES Cities Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1016/j.cities.2024.105694
Honghuan Gu , Bindong Sun
{"title":"The urban spatial change hypothesis revisited: A case study of Shanghai","authors":"Honghuan Gu ,&nbsp;Bindong Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.cities.2024.105694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The classical Urban Spatial Change (USC) hypothesis efficiently summarizes urban development patterns through population changes across space but faces disputes regarding its generality and applicability due to its reliance on empirical research primarily from Western contexts. This paper provides the most up-to-date examination of the complete trajectory of Shanghai's remarkable urban transition from a small county to the world's third-largest megacity over 177 years (1843–2020), based on long-term population spatial changes within the USC hypothesis framework. The findings suggest that while Shanghai generally follows the conventional USC trajectory of centralization, decentralization, and recentralization, it also exhibits notable heterogeneities. Those include the bypassing of disurbanization and highly compressed processes following a sequence of urbanization, suburbanization and reurbanization, strong government interventions accompanied by a complex and dynamic interplay between market forces, and a central role of inter-regional migrants throughout Shanghai's urban life cycle. The results support the view that while the USC hypothesis provides a generalized summary of urban systems and offers a concise overview of urban changes, further refinement is necessary to accurately capture the diverse trajectories across different types of cities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48405,"journal":{"name":"Cities","volume":"158 ","pages":"Article 105694"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cities","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275124009089","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The classical Urban Spatial Change (USC) hypothesis efficiently summarizes urban development patterns through population changes across space but faces disputes regarding its generality and applicability due to its reliance on empirical research primarily from Western contexts. This paper provides the most up-to-date examination of the complete trajectory of Shanghai's remarkable urban transition from a small county to the world's third-largest megacity over 177 years (1843–2020), based on long-term population spatial changes within the USC hypothesis framework. The findings suggest that while Shanghai generally follows the conventional USC trajectory of centralization, decentralization, and recentralization, it also exhibits notable heterogeneities. Those include the bypassing of disurbanization and highly compressed processes following a sequence of urbanization, suburbanization and reurbanization, strong government interventions accompanied by a complex and dynamic interplay between market forces, and a central role of inter-regional migrants throughout Shanghai's urban life cycle. The results support the view that while the USC hypothesis provides a generalized summary of urban systems and offers a concise overview of urban changes, further refinement is necessary to accurately capture the diverse trajectories across different types of cities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cities
Cities URBAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
9.00%
发文量
517
期刊介绍: Cities offers a comprehensive range of articles on all aspects of urban policy. It provides an international and interdisciplinary platform for the exchange of ideas and information between urban planners and policy makers from national and local government, non-government organizations, academia and consultancy. The primary aims of the journal are to analyse and assess past and present urban development and management as a reflection of effective, ineffective and non-existent planning policies; and the promotion of the implementation of appropriate urban policies in both the developed and the developing world.
期刊最新文献
Public emotions and the built environment in hazards: A case study of the Shenzhen catastrophic landslide The mechanism for the intra-city employment growth: The role of employment centers Urbanization, housing, and inclusive design for all? A community-based participatory research investigation of the health implications of high-rise environments for adolescents Gift economy as an alternative to achieve sustainable development: The case of Earthen Routes City size distribution of African countries: A spatial analysis using geospatial data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1