Informing the Design of Large-Scale Food Fortification Programs with Secondary Data: Pilot Results from Nigeria and Zambia

IF 3.2 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Current Developments in Nutrition Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-10 DOI:10.1016/j.cdnut.2024.104522
Katherine P Adams , Emmanuel A Gyimah , Svenja M Jungjohann , Jacqueline L Hems , Musonda J Mofu , Olufolakemi Mercy Anjorin , Jennifer Yourkavitch , Silvia Alayón , Heather Danton , Ingrid Weiss , Omar Dary , Monica B Woldt
{"title":"Informing the Design of Large-Scale Food Fortification Programs with Secondary Data: Pilot Results from Nigeria and Zambia","authors":"Katherine P Adams ,&nbsp;Emmanuel A Gyimah ,&nbsp;Svenja M Jungjohann ,&nbsp;Jacqueline L Hems ,&nbsp;Musonda J Mofu ,&nbsp;Olufolakemi Mercy Anjorin ,&nbsp;Jennifer Yourkavitch ,&nbsp;Silvia Alayón ,&nbsp;Heather Danton ,&nbsp;Ingrid Weiss ,&nbsp;Omar Dary ,&nbsp;Monica B Woldt","doi":"10.1016/j.cdnut.2024.104522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Large-scale food fortification (LSFF) can improve micronutrient intake, but low-income and middle-income countries often lack resources to collect data for LSFF decision making. We designed a methodology using existing data and methods to inform LSFF programming.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aimed to pilot a methodology using existing diet, market, and diet cost data and assess its implementation feasibility and usefulness for LSFF decision making.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We used household food consumption/availability data from Nigeria and Zambia to assess dietary micronutrient inadequacy and model contributions of LSFF. Market survey (Nigeria) and agrifood information system (Zambia) data were used to estimate availability of fortifiable foods. We used Cost of the Diet software to estimate affordability of an adequate diet in Zambia. We engaged country stakeholders to determine modeling parameters and assess methodology implementation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The analyses took ∼6 mo and cost ∼150,000 USD (Nigeria) and ∼250,000 USD (Zambia). Results showed diets were inadequate to meet vitamin A, folate, and zinc requirements of 32%–67% of households in Nigeria and 51%–83% of households in Zambia. Modeling existing LSFF in Nigeria demonstrated improved micronutrient adequacy of diets, with further improvements possible with rice fortification. In Zambia, existing vitamin A–fortified sugar marginally reduced inadequacy. Introducing mandatory wheat flour and/or maize flour fortification could reduce folate and zinc inadequacies. The market assessment demonstrated widespread availability of fortifiable edible oil, sugar, and wheat flour, but not fortifiable maize flour. The cost of the diet in Zambia with LSFF was similar to the cost without LSFF. Stakeholders found the methodology’s components together generated useful, timely evidence for LSFF programming.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our methodology showed opportunities for improving the micronutrient adequacy of diets in Nigeria and Zambia through LSFF. The methodology generated evidence that stakeholders agreed can support LSFF planning. Investments and strategies are needed to strengthen capacity to conduct the assessments, reduce costs, and streamline methods.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10756,"journal":{"name":"Current Developments in Nutrition","volume":"9 2","pages":"Article 104522"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Developments in Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2475299124024569","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Large-scale food fortification (LSFF) can improve micronutrient intake, but low-income and middle-income countries often lack resources to collect data for LSFF decision making. We designed a methodology using existing data and methods to inform LSFF programming.

Objectives

This study aimed to pilot a methodology using existing diet, market, and diet cost data and assess its implementation feasibility and usefulness for LSFF decision making.

Methods

We used household food consumption/availability data from Nigeria and Zambia to assess dietary micronutrient inadequacy and model contributions of LSFF. Market survey (Nigeria) and agrifood information system (Zambia) data were used to estimate availability of fortifiable foods. We used Cost of the Diet software to estimate affordability of an adequate diet in Zambia. We engaged country stakeholders to determine modeling parameters and assess methodology implementation.

Results

The analyses took ∼6 mo and cost ∼150,000 USD (Nigeria) and ∼250,000 USD (Zambia). Results showed diets were inadequate to meet vitamin A, folate, and zinc requirements of 32%–67% of households in Nigeria and 51%–83% of households in Zambia. Modeling existing LSFF in Nigeria demonstrated improved micronutrient adequacy of diets, with further improvements possible with rice fortification. In Zambia, existing vitamin A–fortified sugar marginally reduced inadequacy. Introducing mandatory wheat flour and/or maize flour fortification could reduce folate and zinc inadequacies. The market assessment demonstrated widespread availability of fortifiable edible oil, sugar, and wheat flour, but not fortifiable maize flour. The cost of the diet in Zambia with LSFF was similar to the cost without LSFF. Stakeholders found the methodology’s components together generated useful, timely evidence for LSFF programming.

Conclusions

Our methodology showed opportunities for improving the micronutrient adequacy of diets in Nigeria and Zambia through LSFF. The methodology generated evidence that stakeholders agreed can support LSFF planning. Investments and strategies are needed to strengthen capacity to conduct the assessments, reduce costs, and streamline methods.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用二次数据为大规模食品强化计划的设计提供信息:尼日利亚和赞比亚的试点结果
大规模食物强化(LSFF)可以改善微量营养素的摄入,但低收入和中等收入国家往往缺乏资源来收集用于LSFF决策的数据。我们利用现有的数据和方法设计了一种方法来为LSFF规划提供信息。本研究旨在利用现有的饮食、市场和饮食成本数据来试验一种方法,并评估其实施的可行性和对LSFF决策的有用性。方法利用尼日利亚和赞比亚的家庭食物消费/可得性数据来评估膳食微量营养素不足和LSFF的模型贡献。市场调查(尼日利亚)和农业食品信息系统(赞比亚)的数据被用来估计强化食品的可得性。我们使用“饮食成本”软件来估计赞比亚人对适当饮食的负担能力。我们让国家利益攸关方参与确定建模参数和评估方法实施情况。结果分析耗时约6个月,费用约15万美元(尼日利亚)和25万美元(赞比亚)。结果显示,尼日利亚32%-67%的家庭和赞比亚51%-83%的家庭的饮食不能满足维生素A、叶酸和锌的需求。对尼日利亚现有的低营养水平食物的模拟表明,饮食中微量营养素的充足性得到了改善,通过强化大米可能会进一步改善。在赞比亚,现有的维生素a强化糖略微减少了不足。引入强制性的小麦粉和/或玉米粉强化可以减少叶酸和锌的不足。市场评估表明,可广泛获得强化食用油、糖和小麦粉,但没有强化玉米粉。赞比亚加LSFF的日粮成本与不加LSFF的日粮成本相似。涉众发现该方法的组成部分一起为LSFF规划生成了有用的、及时的证据。结论sour方法可通过LSFF改善尼日利亚和赞比亚膳食中微量营养素的充足性。该方法产生的证据表明,利益相关者同意可以支持LSFF规划。需要投资和战略来加强进行评估的能力、降低成本和简化方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Developments in Nutrition
Current Developments in Nutrition NUTRITION & DIETETICS-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
4.20%
发文量
1327
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Casein- and Soy-Based High-Protein Diets Differentially Affect Insulin Resistance and Adipose Tissue Advanced Glycation End Product Accumulation in Obese Diabetic Mice Association of Dietary Patterns with Incident Type 2 Diabetes Among Migrant and Nonmigrant Ghanaian Populations in the Prospective Research on Obesity and Diabetes in African Migrants (RODAM-Pros) Study Effect of Supplementation with Red Rooibos Tea on Body Composition, Metabolic Outcomes, and Movement in Ovariectomized Sprague-Dawley Rats BMI Was Maintained Among Women with Low Incomes in Indiana Who Participated in Food Assistance and/or Federal Nutrition Education Over 1 Year Individual Characteristics and National Income Modify the Association between Cognitive Social Capital and Food Insecurity: Evidence from the Gallup World Poll, 2014–2021
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1