Bayesian enhanced graph neural networks: Refining design spaces for hollow concrete components with optimum mechanical performance

IF 6.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Engineering Structures Pub Date : 2025-03-15 Epub Date: 2025-01-11 DOI:10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.119628
Alexander Lin , Hanmo Wang , Wei He , Shawn Owyong , Huan Ting Chen , Tam H. Nguyen
{"title":"Bayesian enhanced graph neural networks: Refining design spaces for hollow concrete components with optimum mechanical performance","authors":"Alexander Lin ,&nbsp;Hanmo Wang ,&nbsp;Wei He ,&nbsp;Shawn Owyong ,&nbsp;Huan Ting Chen ,&nbsp;Tam H. Nguyen","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.119628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Lightweight, non-structural concrete partition walls with customized hollow sections enhance earthquake resilience, particularly by optimizing horizontal stiffness to resist lateral forces in seismic engineering. However, exhaustive search of the entire design space to optimize horizontal stiffness is time-consuming. Therefore, this research aims to develop a classifier to filter out less promising sections, reducing the search space and improving efficiency. Combining Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) and Bayesian Neural Networks (BNNs) offers computational- and time-efficient solutions for classification tasks applicable to the design of hollow building components. However, the impact of different BNN configurations within this hybrid remains underexplored. To address this, we proposed and compared eight hybrid models with different BNNs to identify the optimal hybrid model based on classification accuracy. Results show that the BNN featuring a Bayesian layer followed by two linear layers (BLL) is most effective, achieving around 90 % classification accuracy in both training and testing datasets. To assess search space reduction, we test the models on 2000 samples. The hybrid model featuring BLL in its BNN achieves the best performance, with a 26.85 % search space reduction in the search space. Compared to a traditional statistical model, which achieves a 17.7 % search space reduction, the optimal hybrid model demonstrates superior effectiveness. The present study focuses on single-objective optimization, specifically targeting the performance of horizontal stiffness in directions more sensitive to the configuration change of morphed honeycomb channels in the hollow component. Future work will expand to multi-objective optimization, concurrently considering other mechanical properties for a more comprehensive optimization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"327 ","pages":"Article 119628"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029625000185","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lightweight, non-structural concrete partition walls with customized hollow sections enhance earthquake resilience, particularly by optimizing horizontal stiffness to resist lateral forces in seismic engineering. However, exhaustive search of the entire design space to optimize horizontal stiffness is time-consuming. Therefore, this research aims to develop a classifier to filter out less promising sections, reducing the search space and improving efficiency. Combining Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) and Bayesian Neural Networks (BNNs) offers computational- and time-efficient solutions for classification tasks applicable to the design of hollow building components. However, the impact of different BNN configurations within this hybrid remains underexplored. To address this, we proposed and compared eight hybrid models with different BNNs to identify the optimal hybrid model based on classification accuracy. Results show that the BNN featuring a Bayesian layer followed by two linear layers (BLL) is most effective, achieving around 90 % classification accuracy in both training and testing datasets. To assess search space reduction, we test the models on 2000 samples. The hybrid model featuring BLL in its BNN achieves the best performance, with a 26.85 % search space reduction in the search space. Compared to a traditional statistical model, which achieves a 17.7 % search space reduction, the optimal hybrid model demonstrates superior effectiveness. The present study focuses on single-objective optimization, specifically targeting the performance of horizontal stiffness in directions more sensitive to the configuration change of morphed honeycomb channels in the hollow component. Future work will expand to multi-objective optimization, concurrently considering other mechanical properties for a more comprehensive optimization.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
贝叶斯增强图神经网络:优化设计空间的空心混凝土构件与最佳的机械性能
采用定制中空截面的轻质非结构混凝土隔墙增强了地震恢复能力,特别是通过优化水平刚度来抵抗地震工程中的侧向力。然而,穷尽搜索整个设计空间以优化水平刚度是耗时的。因此,本研究旨在开发一种分类器,过滤掉不太有希望的部分,减少搜索空间,提高效率。结合图神经网络(GNNs)和贝叶斯神经网络(BNNs)为适用于中空建筑构件设计的分类任务提供了计算效率和时间效率的解决方案。然而,不同的BNN结构对这一混合物种的影响仍未得到充分研究。为了解决这个问题,我们提出并比较了8种不同bnn的混合模型,以识别基于分类精度的最优混合模型。结果表明,贝叶斯层后两线性层(BLL)的BNN最有效,在训练和测试数据集上的分类准确率都在90 %左右。为了评估搜索空间缩减,我们在2000个样本上测试了模型。在其BNN中包含BLL的混合模型获得了最好的性能,在搜索空间中减少了26.85 %的搜索空间。与传统统计模型相比,最优混合模型的搜索空间减少了17.7 %,显示出更优的效果。本研究侧重于单目标优化,特别是针对空心构件中变形蜂窝通道构型变化更敏感方向的水平刚度性能。未来的工作将扩展到多目标优化,同时考虑其他力学性能进行更全面的优化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Engineering Structures
Engineering Structures 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
14.50%
发文量
1385
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed. The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering. Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels. Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.
期刊最新文献
Simplified method for verifying ultimate limit state conditions of resistance for masonry shear walls Experimental and numerical investigation of flow-induced vibration in CMC turbine blades using fluid-structure interaction Experimental assessment of micropile flexural capacity at threaded joints subjected to combined axial compression and bending A simple and efficient iterative translation approximation method for simulating stationary non-Gaussian stochastic vector processes An efficient strong seismic analysis model for running safety thresholds of train-track-high pier bridge dynamic system
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1