Are healthy diets also sustainable? Experimental study using a Fake Food Buffet

IF 4.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Food Quality and Preference Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-30 DOI:10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105389
Mirna Al Masri , Laura M. König
{"title":"Are healthy diets also sustainable? Experimental study using a Fake Food Buffet","authors":"Mirna Al Masri ,&nbsp;Laura M. König","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Interventions to promote healthy and sustainable diets are urgently needed to curb growing obesity rates and greenhouse gas emissions. To date, little is known about consumers' awareness of the co-benefits of healthy and sustainable diets. Studies furthermore lack a global perspective. This study therefore aimed (1) to compare the composition of sustainable, healthy, and typical meals using an experimental Fake Food Buffet (FFB) study and (2) to compare sustainable diet knowledge and perceptions between individuals who grow up in Global North and Global South countries. The experiment used a 3 <em>Meal Type</em> x 2 <em>Region</em> mixed design. Participants (<em>N</em> = 74), of which half grew up in the Global North and South, respectively, were asked to self-serve three meals (typical, healthy, sustainable) from the FFB and to complete the Food Sustainability Knowledge Questionnaire (FSKQ). Sustainable meals contained more vegetables, grains, legumes, and plant-based protein (<em>Fs</em>[2, 144] <em>≥</em> 4.26, <em>p</em>s <em>≤</em> .016), and less red meat, animal-based protein, and sugar than healthy or typical meals (<em>F</em>s[2, 144] <em>≥</em> 11.77 <em>p</em>s <em>≤</em> .001). FSKQ scores did not differ between regions (<em>W</em>[71.82] = 0.58, <em>p</em> = .564). However, participants from the Global North self-served more vegetables, grains, and plant-based protein from the FFB compared to participants from the Global South (<em>F</em>s[2, 72] ≥ 4.89 <em>p</em>s ≤ .003). Many people are not fully aware of the substantial overlap of healthy and sustainable diets. Furthermore, culture influences food choices and thus needs to be considered when designing and implementing dietary interventions on a global scale.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"126 ","pages":"Article 105389"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095032932400291X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Interventions to promote healthy and sustainable diets are urgently needed to curb growing obesity rates and greenhouse gas emissions. To date, little is known about consumers' awareness of the co-benefits of healthy and sustainable diets. Studies furthermore lack a global perspective. This study therefore aimed (1) to compare the composition of sustainable, healthy, and typical meals using an experimental Fake Food Buffet (FFB) study and (2) to compare sustainable diet knowledge and perceptions between individuals who grow up in Global North and Global South countries. The experiment used a 3 Meal Type x 2 Region mixed design. Participants (N = 74), of which half grew up in the Global North and South, respectively, were asked to self-serve three meals (typical, healthy, sustainable) from the FFB and to complete the Food Sustainability Knowledge Questionnaire (FSKQ). Sustainable meals contained more vegetables, grains, legumes, and plant-based protein (Fs[2, 144]  4.26, p .016), and less red meat, animal-based protein, and sugar than healthy or typical meals (Fs[2, 144]  11.77 p .001). FSKQ scores did not differ between regions (W[71.82] = 0.58, p = .564). However, participants from the Global North self-served more vegetables, grains, and plant-based protein from the FFB compared to participants from the Global South (Fs[2, 72] ≥ 4.89 ps ≤ .003). Many people are not fully aware of the substantial overlap of healthy and sustainable diets. Furthermore, culture influences food choices and thus needs to be considered when designing and implementing dietary interventions on a global scale.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
健康饮食也是可持续的吗?使用假自助餐的实验研究
目前迫切需要采取干预措施,促进健康和可持续饮食,以遏制日益增长的肥胖率和温室气体排放。迄今为止,消费者对健康和可持续饮食的共同利益的认识尚不清楚。此外,研究缺乏全球视角。因此,本研究旨在(1)通过实验性假食品自助餐(FFB)研究比较可持续、健康和典型膳食的组成;(2)比较在全球北方和全球南方国家长大的个人的可持续饮食知识和观念。试验采用3粕型× 2区混合设计。参与者(N = 74),其中一半分别在全球北方和南方长大,被要求从FFB中自助三餐(典型,健康,可持续),并完成食品可持续性知识问卷(FSKQ)。与健康或典型膳食相比,可持续膳食含有更多的蔬菜、谷物、豆类和植物性蛋白质(Fs[2,144]≥4.26,ps≤0.016),更少的红肉、动物性蛋白质和糖(Fs[2,144]≥11.77 ps≤0.001)。FSKQ评分在不同地区间无差异(W[71.82] = 0.58, p = .564)。然而,与来自全球南方的参与者相比,来自全球北方的参与者自食更多来自FFB的蔬菜、谷物和植物性蛋白质(Fs[2,72]≥4.89 ps≤0.003)。许多人没有充分意识到健康和可持续饮食之间的重大重叠。此外,文化影响食物选择,因此在全球范围内设计和实施饮食干预措施时需要考虑文化因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Food Quality and Preference
Food Quality and Preference 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
15.10%
发文量
263
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.
期刊最新文献
The suppression of moral engagement in consumer responses to animal slaughter Polychrome versus monochrome Nutri-Score shelf labels: An eye-tracking study of consumer attention and choice Effects of adding plant-based menu options on meat selection frequency: A randomized controlled experiment Consumer preferences for simultaneous presentation of nutrition and environmental labelling: Evidence from a discrete choice experiment at UK scale Multidimensional drivers of texture preference: Integrating oral behavior, tactile acuity and thermal taster status
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1