Binding and bonding of commercialization and collaboration by KPIs: An integrated approach for sustainable agriculture research performance management

IF 4.9 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Sustainable Futures Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-21 DOI:10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100459
Prabath Chaminda Abeysiriwardana , Udith Krishantha Jayasinghe-Mudalige
{"title":"Binding and bonding of commercialization and collaboration by KPIs: An integrated approach for sustainable agriculture research performance management","authors":"Prabath Chaminda Abeysiriwardana ,&nbsp;Udith Krishantha Jayasinghe-Mudalige","doi":"10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Commercialization and collaboration are the essence of the sustainability of applied research. These two critical success factors (CSFs) are instrumental in creating a conducive research culture that produces socially impactful innovations and contributes to the country's economic growth. This study explores the perceptions of 32 research leaders in the upper echelon of research administration of 24 research institutes in Sri Lanka regarding the management of collaboration and commercialization aspects in research and development (R&amp;D)<del>.</del> Experts' opinions were analyzed using thematic analysis methodology based on grounded theory, etc. Results suggest that commercialization was not optimized beyond a threshold value of innovative activity from a developing country perspective and that collaborations were underestimated in propelling innovation engines. Similarities were observed in their insights on commercialization and collaboration, highlighting the necessity of integrating those measurements for a synergetic effect. The authors propose that R&amp;D institutes can model these two CSFs as interlinked Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) within an integrated Performance Management System (PMS). This approach helps mitigate the risk of R&amp;D efforts failing to translate into innovations by generating early performance insights that prevent research leaders from selecting unpromising R&amp;D endeavors, while also ensuring that the most promising initiatives are prioritized during the early stages of the research process. The authors, therefore, propose a novel decision-making model that maintains a balanced focus across CSFs by fostering organizational flexibility. Policy directives supporting the integrated management of commercialization and collaboration were discussed to enhance their mutual reinforcement in driving agriculture research innovations beneficial to society.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34478,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Futures","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100459"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Futures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666188825000292","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Commercialization and collaboration are the essence of the sustainability of applied research. These two critical success factors (CSFs) are instrumental in creating a conducive research culture that produces socially impactful innovations and contributes to the country's economic growth. This study explores the perceptions of 32 research leaders in the upper echelon of research administration of 24 research institutes in Sri Lanka regarding the management of collaboration and commercialization aspects in research and development (R&D). Experts' opinions were analyzed using thematic analysis methodology based on grounded theory, etc. Results suggest that commercialization was not optimized beyond a threshold value of innovative activity from a developing country perspective and that collaborations were underestimated in propelling innovation engines. Similarities were observed in their insights on commercialization and collaboration, highlighting the necessity of integrating those measurements for a synergetic effect. The authors propose that R&D institutes can model these two CSFs as interlinked Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) within an integrated Performance Management System (PMS). This approach helps mitigate the risk of R&D efforts failing to translate into innovations by generating early performance insights that prevent research leaders from selecting unpromising R&D endeavors, while also ensuring that the most promising initiatives are prioritized during the early stages of the research process. The authors, therefore, propose a novel decision-making model that maintains a balanced focus across CSFs by fostering organizational flexibility. Policy directives supporting the integrated management of commercialization and collaboration were discussed to enhance their mutual reinforcement in driving agriculture research innovations beneficial to society.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关键绩效指标对商业化与合作的约束与结合:可持续农业研究绩效管理的综合方法
商业化和合作是应用研究可持续性的本质。这两个关键的成功因素(CSFs)有助于创造一种有益的研究文化,这种文化产生具有社会影响力的创新,并有助于国家的经济增长。本研究探讨了斯里兰卡24个研究机构研究管理高层的32位研究领导者对研究与开发(R&;D)中合作和商业化方面的管理的看法。采用扎根理论等为基础的专题分析方法对专家意见进行分析。结果表明,从发展中国家的角度来看,商业化并没有超过创新活动的阈值,并且在推动创新引擎方面低估了合作。在他们对商业化和合作的见解中观察到相似之处,强调了整合这些衡量标准以产生协同效应的必要性。作者建议研发机构可以将这两个关键绩效指标作为综合绩效管理系统(PMS)中相互关联的关键绩效指标(kpi)进行建模。这种方法有助于减轻研发工作未能转化为创新的风险,通过产生早期的性能洞察,防止研究领导者选择没有前途的研发工作,同时也确保最有前途的计划在研究过程的早期阶段被优先考虑。因此,作者提出了一种新的决策模型,该模型通过促进组织灵活性来保持对各个csf的平衡关注。会议讨论了支持商业化和合作综合管理的政策指令,以加强它们在推动有益于社会的农业研究创新方面的相互加强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sustainable Futures
Sustainable Futures Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
1.80%
发文量
34
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable Futures: is a journal focused on the intersection of sustainability, environment and technology from various disciplines in social sciences, and their larger implications for corporation, government, education institutions, regions and society both at present and in the future. It provides an advanced platform for studies related to sustainability and sustainable development in society, economics, environment, and culture. The scope of the journal is broad and encourages interdisciplinary research, as well as welcoming theoretical and practical research from all methodological approaches.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the impact of climate change anxiety and social media information overload on unusual purchase behavior Why direct payments are more effective for combatting poverty than fair prices Exploring the role of media in climate change awareness and adaptation among university students in Islamabad, Pakistan Sustainable leather processing: A critical review of emerging green technologies and practices The impact mechanism of ESG ratings on firm value: An empirical study based on the multi-period difference-in-differences approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1