The role of temperament and personality traits in assessing reaction efficiency in a homogeneous population of pilot candidates

IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Personality and Individual Differences Pub Date : 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2025.113081
Marcin Piotr Biernacki, Piotr Zieliński, Łukasz Dziuda
{"title":"The role of temperament and personality traits in assessing reaction efficiency in a homogeneous population of pilot candidates","authors":"Marcin Piotr Biernacki,&nbsp;Piotr Zieliński,&nbsp;Łukasz Dziuda","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2025.113081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Pilots are a highly pre-selected and relatively homogeneous population and have relatively limited individual differences. In the present study, we examined the extent to which temperament and personality traits influence the basic dimensions of reaction efficiency in pilot candidates. We considered the results of 799 subjects, using canonical correlation analysis to determine the relationship between the two groups of variables. We employed the Formal Characteristics of Behaviour – Temperament Inventory and the Neuroticism–Extraversion–Openness Five Factor Inventory to assess temperament and personality traits. In addition, we evaluated reaction efficiency based on the Determination Test, the Cognitrone Test, and the Reaction Test, which are part of the Vienna Test System battery. The processing speed indicators, as well as the number of errors, were the main contributors to reaction efficiency. Based on the structure coefficients, we concluded that higher neuroticism is associated with lower speed and a higher number of errors, as well as lower briskness, activity, and extraversion. These traits can explain a significant proportion of the test performance results, despite the minor interpersonal variability in temperament and personality traits.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"238 ","pages":"Article 113081"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886925000431","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pilots are a highly pre-selected and relatively homogeneous population and have relatively limited individual differences. In the present study, we examined the extent to which temperament and personality traits influence the basic dimensions of reaction efficiency in pilot candidates. We considered the results of 799 subjects, using canonical correlation analysis to determine the relationship between the two groups of variables. We employed the Formal Characteristics of Behaviour – Temperament Inventory and the Neuroticism–Extraversion–Openness Five Factor Inventory to assess temperament and personality traits. In addition, we evaluated reaction efficiency based on the Determination Test, the Cognitrone Test, and the Reaction Test, which are part of the Vienna Test System battery. The processing speed indicators, as well as the number of errors, were the main contributors to reaction efficiency. Based on the structure coefficients, we concluded that higher neuroticism is associated with lower speed and a higher number of errors, as well as lower briskness, activity, and extraversion. These traits can explain a significant proportion of the test performance results, despite the minor interpersonal variability in temperament and personality traits.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
577
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.
期刊最新文献
A meta-analysis of rumination and digital addiction The effects of observed ostracism on social avoidance: The role of fear of negative evaluation and rumination The role of temperament and personality traits in assessing reaction efficiency in a homogeneous population of pilot candidates Corrigendum to “Adult attachment and prolonged grief: A systematic review and meta-analysis” [Personality and Individual Differences 214 (2023) 112315] Inside Front Cover - Ed. Board, Aims and Scope, Copyright, Publication information, Orders and Claims, Advertising information, Author inquiries, Permissions, Funding body, Permanence of paper, Impressum (German titles only) and GFA link in double column
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1