Extraction of brewer’s spent grain protein using natural deep eutectic solvent compared to alkaline extraction: Evaluating their yields, physicochemical characteristics, and functionalities
Kunn Hadinoto , Jordy Kim-Ung Ling , Jin-Won Park , The-Thien Tran , Siyu Pu
{"title":"Extraction of brewer’s spent grain protein using natural deep eutectic solvent compared to alkaline extraction: Evaluating their yields, physicochemical characteristics, and functionalities","authors":"Kunn Hadinoto , Jordy Kim-Ung Ling , Jin-Won Park , The-Thien Tran , Siyu Pu","doi":"10.1016/j.fbp.2024.12.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The present study compared the effectiveness of natural deep eutectic solvent (NADES) and alkaline in extracting proteins from brewer’s spent grain (BSG). The extraction effectiveness was examined by the (i) yield, (ii) physicochemical characteristics (i.e., molecular weight, protein secondary structures, amino acid compositions, thermal stability), and (iii) food-relevant functionalities (i.e., water/oil holding capacities, emulsifying, foaming properties) of BSG protein extracts. Choline chloride-trehalose (3:1 mol/mol) known for its protein stabilizing effect was used as the model NADES. The ideal NADES extraction conditions to optimize the yield were first determined at 60<span><math><mi>℃</mi></math></span>, 1:15 (w/v) BSG-to-solvent ratio, and 75:25 (v/v) NADES-to-water ratio. At their respective optimal conditions, NADES extraction produced a higher yield than alkaline extraction (42 vs. 34 wt%). Minimal variations were observed between NADES and alkaline-extracted proteins in their molecular weight, protein secondary structures, amino acid profiles, and water/oil holding capacities. Nevertheless, NADES-extracted protein exhibited superior (1) thermal stability, hence reaffirming the protein stabilizing effect of NADES, and (2) emulsifying/foaming properties postulated due to their distinct amino acid compositions. The present results demonstrated NADES extraction achieved outcomes comparable to alkaline extraction in most aspects, while surpassing it in yield and proteins’ thermal stability, emulsifying/foaming properties. Future studies should focus on optimizing the yield of NADES extraction to improve its techno-economic viability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12134,"journal":{"name":"Food and Bioproducts Processing","volume":"150 ","pages":"Pages 12-24"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food and Bioproducts Processing","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960308524002736","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The present study compared the effectiveness of natural deep eutectic solvent (NADES) and alkaline in extracting proteins from brewer’s spent grain (BSG). The extraction effectiveness was examined by the (i) yield, (ii) physicochemical characteristics (i.e., molecular weight, protein secondary structures, amino acid compositions, thermal stability), and (iii) food-relevant functionalities (i.e., water/oil holding capacities, emulsifying, foaming properties) of BSG protein extracts. Choline chloride-trehalose (3:1 mol/mol) known for its protein stabilizing effect was used as the model NADES. The ideal NADES extraction conditions to optimize the yield were first determined at 60, 1:15 (w/v) BSG-to-solvent ratio, and 75:25 (v/v) NADES-to-water ratio. At their respective optimal conditions, NADES extraction produced a higher yield than alkaline extraction (42 vs. 34 wt%). Minimal variations were observed between NADES and alkaline-extracted proteins in their molecular weight, protein secondary structures, amino acid profiles, and water/oil holding capacities. Nevertheless, NADES-extracted protein exhibited superior (1) thermal stability, hence reaffirming the protein stabilizing effect of NADES, and (2) emulsifying/foaming properties postulated due to their distinct amino acid compositions. The present results demonstrated NADES extraction achieved outcomes comparable to alkaline extraction in most aspects, while surpassing it in yield and proteins’ thermal stability, emulsifying/foaming properties. Future studies should focus on optimizing the yield of NADES extraction to improve its techno-economic viability.
期刊介绍:
Official Journal of the European Federation of Chemical Engineering:
Part C
FBP aims to be the principal international journal for publication of high quality, original papers in the branches of engineering and science dedicated to the safe processing of biological products. It is the only journal to exploit the synergy between biotechnology, bioprocessing and food engineering.
Papers showing how research results can be used in engineering design, and accounts of experimental or theoretical research work bringing new perspectives to established principles, highlighting unsolved problems or indicating directions for future research, are particularly welcome. Contributions that deal with new developments in equipment or processes and that can be given quantitative expression are encouraged. The journal is especially interested in papers that extend the boundaries of food and bioproducts processing.
The journal has a strong emphasis on the interface between engineering and food or bioproducts. Papers that are not likely to be published are those:
• Primarily concerned with food formulation
• That use experimental design techniques to obtain response surfaces but gain little insight from them
• That are empirical and ignore established mechanistic models, e.g., empirical drying curves
• That are primarily concerned about sensory evaluation and colour
• Concern the extraction, encapsulation and/or antioxidant activity of a specific biological material without providing insight that could be applied to a similar but different material,
• Containing only chemical analyses of biological materials.